PR News
<span id="hs_cos_wrapper_name" class="hs_cos_wrapper hs_cos_wrapper_meta_field hs_cos_wrapper_type_text" style="" data-hs-cos-general-type="meta_field" data-hs-cos-type="text" >Telum Vox Pop: Impact of mandatory ESG reporting in Australia</span>

Telum Vox Pop: Impact of mandatory ESG reporting in Australia

With environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting now mandatory in Australia, the role of financial communications in shaping a company's sustainability narrative has never been more crucial.

As businesses adapt to this evolving landscape, financial PR agencies face the challenge of building credibility and trust amid increasing market scepticism.

Telum spoke with financial PR professionals to uncover their strategies for fostering transparency, countering misinformation and strengthening corporate reputation.

How do you approach communicating ESG initiatives in a way that balances aspirational goals with the need for measurable, verifiable results?

Susie Bell, Managing Partner, Honner

Environmental sustainability may be a key theme of this century. A lot has changed in recent months, but there are still opportunities for ESG-focused initiatives even if global priorities have shifted. It's now perhaps even more critical that environmental claims go beyond feel-good marketing.

Wider scrutiny and mandatory ESG reporting for large entities mean the public is well-tuned to greenwashing.

Our approach to communicating ESG initiatives begins with our client company's beliefs and strategy. Communicating why ESG initiatives are being implemented, how they align with the corporate strategy, and how they will translate into action sets the scene and demonstrates credibility.

In any corporate communications, authenticity is key. We agree with the ACCC's principles for making environmental claims. Briefly, these are:
  • Be accurate and truthful
  • Have evidence
  • Don't hide important information
  • Explain any conditions or qualifications
  • Be specific
  • Use clear, simple language
  • Don't let visuals be misleading
  • Be open about progress
​​​​These 'hygiene factors' underpin any good communication, but messages must also be engaging. We use tools such as detail-rich, real-world examples, video, visual story-telling, social media, and written pieces to engage audiences.

Julia Hoy, Associate Partner and Sustainability Communications Lead, Sefiani
Stakeholders demand tangible evidence of real-world impact. We are at a critical juncture where stakeholder trust has waned in companies with good intentions that have set ambitious, aspirational targets which have since been retracted in the face of market changes or challenges.

In our experience, it is critical that companies continue to set aspirational goals and provide stakeholders with clear visibility on how they are tracking on the path towards these.

This requires an open dialogue and regular evidence-based communication that is transparent and clearly articulates progress. By doing so, companies can cultivate trust among increasingly sceptical stakeholders.
 
Aspirational goals in 2025 extend well beyond climate targets; for example, there is growing demand for companies to demonstrate socially and environmentally responsible supply chains.

Achieving this requires leadership, collaboration, and investment. Companies that rise to these larger challenges don't just mitigate risks, they build long-term value and drive meaningful progress in the industry.

What role does financial communications play in helping clients respond to accusations of greenwashing, and how do you mitigate this risk upfront?

Susie Bell

Our view is that accurate and clear financial communications are critical, especially as climate change is a highly emotive topic.

Of course, companies need to do the right thing in the first place and back up any claims with measurable actions and results. If areas of concern do arise, they should be clearly identified, disclosed and rectified, where possible.

Greenwashing allegations can quickly spiral into reputational crises, making swift, accurate, and authentic communication essential. Attempts to downplay or sidestep the issue only heighten public distrust and prolong the negative spotlight.

Julia Hoy
Financial communications are critical to ensuring that all sustainability efforts are reported with transparency and integrity. This involves rigorous due diligence, as well as third-party verification, to maintain the credibility of any claims before they are made public.

This means communicators are playing the role of gatekeeping, in collaboration with sustainability and legal teams, to ensure that claims are both verifiable and compliant with regulations. It's essential to base narratives on solid evidence that ties directly to financial performance and sustainable impact. 

Moreover, communicators must promote a culture of openness, transparency, and authenticity across the organisation, ensuring firm alignment in communication and reporting. By establishing these robust processes upfront, companies can confidently convey their sustainability efforts, safeguarding their reputation and preserving the trust that takes years to rebuild once lost.
Previous story

Thriving in an AI-driven landscape

Next story

Telum Talks To: Douglas Wright, CEO of Wrights Communication

You might also enjoy

Sefiani
Research

Sefiani unveils new research on AI visibility ownership

Strategic communications consultancy, Sefiani, part of Clarity Global, has released a new study indicating that 84 per cent of Australian marketing and comms leaders disagree on who "owns" AI visibility, while the remaining 16 per cent take an integrated approach.

Conducted by OnePoll on behalf of Sefiani, the research surveyed 150 marketing and communications leaders at Director level and above from organisations with more than 50 employees, exploring how strategies have been adapted in response to AI search.

According to the report, 91 per cent of cross-departmental leaders are revising their strategies to influence AI-driven discovery, although an internal "turf war" is emerging over who controls brands' AI search visibility. The research found that ownership currently sits across five functions: data / analytics (23 per cent), comms / corporate affairs (20 per cent), brand (19 per cent), digital (17 per cent), and performance (16 per cent), which the agency said reflects a structurally fragmented approach within many organisations.

The "silo" challenge
To complement its findings, Sefiani collected qualitative insights from leaders through a series of executive GEO-focused sessions and a recent panel moderated by Mandy Galmes, Managing Partner at Sefiani. Speakers included Johanna Lowe, Chief Marketing and Communications Officer at the University of Sydney; Brad Pogson, Head of Communications at Lendi Group; and Tom Telford, Chief Digital Officer at Clarity Global.

Based on these discussions, several themes emerged around managing reputation in AI-driven environments:

  • Internal silos as a key barrier: Participants noted that while some leaders are encouraging cross-functional experimentation, others remain 'nihilistic' about breaking down traditional departmental walls, leading to stalled effort and wasted budgets. The panel identified the rise of AI as a 'shadow task' layered on top of existing senior role requirements without removing previous duties, which further delays progress.
  • The forever life of reputational issues: According to panellists, LLMs draw on long-term patterns across coverage, reviews, forums, and owned content, meaning historic issues may continue resurfacing in AI-generated responses. This suggests that organisations might need to take a more data-led, cross-channel approach to finding, correcting, and rebalancing inaccurate information.
  • Quality content remains critical: Insights from the discussion indicated that AI models do not discriminate by content format, but they do reward depth. The findings suggest that high-quality, thought leadership content performs better within LLM training sets, so it should be considered as central to strategies across channels moving forward.

The cost of siloed GEO: Misinformation and reputational risk
The agency stated that a lack of clear ownership over GEO is already having tangible consequences. Based on the research, AI search was cited by leaders as the most structurally siloed channel, with 77 per cent reporting problems in the last 12 months. This included a slower response to issues, conflicting messages across channels, and AI tools amplifying yesterday's problems instead of today's narratives.

The study also found that the risk is compounded by the speed at which AI-generated misinformation can spread, with 25 per cent of leaders reporting that incorrect, inconsistent, or outdated brand information has already appeared in AI answers.

"Reputation used to be managed channel by channel, but AI search has changed the rules. Because these systems read across everything - earned coverage, on-site content, social signals, and search authority - siloed marketing and communications are quietly muting your AI visibility," said Tom Telford.

"When your channels don't tell the same story, or teams are chasing independent KPIs with separate budget pots, these silos also become a major reputational liability. It is only when functions are truly connected that the models become trained on a consistent brand message and compound visibility across AI services over time. This is the crux of GEO, Generative Engine Optimisation, and done well it becomes the multiplier on everything you already invest in brand, PR and digital."

The "citations race": PR and earned media take centre stage
The report also suggested that a shift toward AI-first discovery is changing budget priorities.

According to the findings, 49 per cent of leaders have already allocated five to 10 per cent of their marketing and communications budgets to AI visibility, with 90 per cent of that spend being reallocated from traditional channels like paid digital and brand. A further 30 per cent reported allocating up to 20 per cent of their budgets.

Citing external analysis from Gartner, the agency noted that the majority of sources referenced by AI systems are non-paid, which the report argues increases the strategic importance of PR and earned media in AI-driven discovery.

Mandy Galmes said: "When LLMs answer a question in your category, they’re drawing overwhelmingly on non-paid, third party sources. If your spokespeople, experts, case studies and proof points aren’t in those sources, you’re invisible at a key moment in the buyer journey." 

Francesca
Moves

Francesca Talevski moves into education sector with senior comms role

Francesca Talevski has been welcomed at Keypath Education as Senior Manager, Communications & Brand. She has wrapped up close to a decade at Vanguard Australia, most recently as Senior Public Relations Specialist.  

Rhiannon
Moves

Rhiannon Hughes takes up Vivid Sydney contract

Rhiannon Hughes has started as PR Manager for Vivid Sydney at Destination NSW. She was previously at TEAM LEWIS as Campaign Director.

Rhiannon also holds experience at Employsure, Sling & Stone AU / NZ, and Porter Novelli New Zealand.