Andy Green is a multi-award-winning UK-based PR practitioner who has worked for major brands around the world. He is the Founder of AndyGreenCreativity and has written seven books on creativity and brand communications. He is also a Co-founder of Grow Social Capital and the Dublin Conversations. Telum Media caught up with Andy in Australia, where he had just run a mobile creativity workshop in Melbourne for the IABC called "Tramspiration".
Andy, I wanted to talk about creativity in PR. I was wondering how the move to hybrid working post COVID has affected the creative process. Does it have a big impact on how creative we can be?
It's a mixed blessing in that it encourages people to work independently and from different locations, while also bringing people together. That combination of solo and group working can have a positive dynamic.
The danger I'm really worried about is around age. You learn in the workplace essentially by earwigging - by watching people in action - and you get inspiration. I do worry that there's a generation now with less exposure to good role models, mentors, and just incidental learning.
There's a push to get people back into the office, partly driven by office space costs, but supported by that idea of learning by osmosis from people around you.
Yes, but even then, there's a lot of variety at home. This is an interesting dimension of one of my passions: how your journey to work is perhaps one of the richest parts of the daily schedule for inspiration and stimulus, because you get the most unexpected interventions, masses of stimuli.
The challenge we have, however, is that the majority almost choose to stare at their screen or stare inwardly, be alone with their mind and their thoughts, rather than be energised and engaged with the tremendous opportunity that the journey presents, whether it's a tube, a tram, even in the car.
Let's talk about that journey. You've been over here in Australia running a course called “Tramspiration” - on a tram for a couple of hours to talk about creativity. What's the idea behind it?
The essence of the creative process is essentially framing, so the journey of 100 miles begins with a question.
The more flexible and dynamic you can be in your question framing, the more potentially successful you can be in terms of generating different novel, unusual, creative output.
So really what we do with the "Tramspiration" sessions, or "Tubespiration" when we run them in London, is to get people to identify and work a challenge, and then, through a series of prompts, get them to refine their challenge.
Our first task will be to identify the level of complexity. And the London Underground can work as a metaphor here - Zone 1 problems are very simple, a neat beginning, middle and end. You may just be looking to answer one question.
Zone 6 might involve a couple of lines, a couple of changes, but still potentially doable, so you're looking at a bank of questions. Zone 10 is, well, "off the map" - chaotic - a series of anchor questions, a bank of questions, seeds of doubt, and a range of prompts.
The idea then is to use the journey and every single prompt, whether it's the physical journey, the different adverts, or the stimuli.
We had one journey where we succeeded in losing one of our group of eight during the trek from the meeting room to the tube stop. That was used as a positive stimulus to say, "what's the comparison in your situation?", which we would never have necessarily come up with as a potential seed or a provocation. And so it's really about the journey: you get 1001 similarly unexpected things happening, which you don't get while sitting at your desk.
I'm also passionate about what I call incubation, where you sleep on an idea and be creatively mindful.
So it's essentially about posing the question, being alert to stimuli, and then also switching off and letting it grow unconsciously before it emerges with blinding clarity.
There has been a lot of focus and discussion on the place of AI in our profession, looking at how it can impact and improve workflows and team dynamics. Is it a help, a hindrance, a threat, or just another tool that we need to understand and master?
It's every single one of those dimensions. It's a great help and I think the more masterful you are at the art and craft of creativity, the better you can exploit its potential.
I liken AI to having the most resourceful, intelligent team of interns at your disposal. But they
are interns.
At the other end of the spectrum, it's going to introduce lazy creativity, lazy work. You're going to get a lot more "crud" as easily available options that could pass off as "amenable", the lowest quality threshold.
The middle ground is going to be the big loser, where people can do things faster, quicker and cheaper through AI, and you're not realising the full potential of the master craftsperson.
Is there a risk that we invest so much time in implementing and integrating these tools into our creative process, and then the whole thing grinds to a halt because the courts and regulators clamp down to protect people's original creative output?
Yes and no. It's a bit like when you're lost in a strange city and you rely on Google Maps, and that reliance then sort of negates the need for you to get any bearings and understand or grasp the context or situation, so you can be completely left high and dry when your phone dies.
On the other hand, I'm a great believer that stuff-ups are a great avenue for creative or disruptive thinking.
There does need to be an emphasis on investing in and enhancing these tools.
The other end of the spectrum, what I call social capital comms, is where you're just talking with people, engaging with people, listening to people and drawing appreciative inquiry, drawing a positive from any encounter. I think that'd be a richer yield area, because the really successful people are the ones who have access to wider answers, compared to those who just sort of stick to the core, the mainstream and the obvious.
The concept of purpose and sustainability is very rapidly moving away from a tick-box corporate reporting thing, and the creative process is being brought to bear on it in a big way, as companies realise they have to embrace it, talk about it, and do something about it. How important is creativity in understanding your purpose as an organisation and communicating that authentically?
Creativity is a dimension of one's purpose, so you have a lot of fulfilment through what we call creative purpose, and it's partly fuelled this trend because of the move to convergent media and multi-channel stories - you had to move away from tactical stories to much more strategic stories.
Now, in an age of greater scepticism and lack of trust, you've really got to dig down deep on authenticity, and one of the most powerful authentic tools is not to say "trust me", but to demonstrate with a story how you can trust me. That builds the bridges, creates the avenues for confidence in the relationship and trust, and a future sustainable relationship.
Feature
Telum Talks To: Andy Green, Founder of AndyGreenCreativity
by Telum Media
6 April 2025 4:00 PM
7 mins read
Telum Media creating connections
Get in touch to learn more
You might also enjoy
Moves
Wala Amara has moved to Riyadh from Dubai and joined 54 as an Account Director. In her new role, she leads strategic communications efforts, focusing on driving narrative and visibility for sports and tourism clients in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Wala joined 54 from Seven Media, where she managed several sports campaigns. She has also worked with 777Partners and DAZN in the UK.
27 February 2026 6:17 AM
1 min read
Feature
Storytelling has long been central to NGO communications, but its role is evolving. It's no longer only about raising awareness or driving donations, but translating complex issues into human narratives that audiences can grasp and act on.
Telum Media spoke with Jackie Hanafie, Founder and Principal Consultant of Humankind Advisory, about how NGOs can rethink storytelling to influence policy and behaviour, embed ethics and lived experience into communications, balance impact with nuance and accountability, and adopt a more hopeful, human-centred approach.
Storytelling has traditionally helped NGOs drive awareness and donations. As it becomes a more strategic tool to shape public opinion and policy, how should organisations rethink its role in influencing narratives, behaviours, and systemic change?
In today’s crowded, fast-moving information landscape, storytelling should be treated as a strategic asset - shaping how issues are understood, who is seen as responsible, and what solutions feel possible.
That means rethinking storytelling as narrative infrastructure, not just content. Individual stories are powerful, but when they are connected to structural issues - policy gaps, market failures, social norms - they help audiences understand both the what and why. This shifts the focus from charity to justice, from sympathy to shared responsibility. A well-told story can humanise data, but it can also frame policy conversations and influence how decision-makers define the problem.
Storytelling should also shift away from victimhood. Traditional NGO communications often portray communities as passive recipients of aid, but effective storytelling highlights local leadership, resilience, and partnership. This reframes beneficiaries as changemakers rather than dependants. When audiences see dignity and capability, they are more likely to support long-term solutions rather than short-term fixes.
Storytelling should also be aligned with clear behavioural and policy objectives. Whether the goal is shifting public attitudes, influencing a legislative debate, or changing consumer behaviour, narratives should be designed with measurable outcomes in mind. This requires collaboration across communications, policy, and program teams.
When storytelling is strategic, ethical, and systems-focused, it becomes more than awareness-raising; it acts as a catalyst for lasting change.
NGOs often tell stories about underrepresented communities and issues with less power or visibility. How do you ensure these stories are told ethically and respectfully, and that the people involved have a say in how they are represented?
This is a big responsibility for NGOs and ethics must be embedded in the process rather than as a final sign-off before publication.
It starts with informed, ongoing consent - people understanding their story will be shared, where, how, why, and they can withdraw at any time. In a digital world where content can travel far beyond its original context, transparency is essential.
Participation should go beyond consent to collaboration, with communities having a say in story framing, details, and visual representation. This might mean sharing drafts, inviting feedback, co-creating content, or supporting people to tell their own stories. Ethical storytelling shifts from “about them” to “with them”.
Stories should highlight dignity, agency, and context - acknowledging structural barriers without reducing individuals to them, which can unintentionally strip away complexity, humanity, and agency. Safeguarding is also critical, particularly for people in fragile or politically sensitive environments. This includes assessing risks around visibility, privacy, cultural sensitivity, and potential backlash. Sometimes the most ethical choice is to anonymise or not tell a story at all.
Organisations should also create clear internal guidelines and accountability mechanisms around storytelling ethics. When communities are respected as collaborators of their narratives, storytelling becomes more authentic, credible, and powerful in driving meaningful change.
NGOs face pressure to demonstrate impact, but storytelling can risk oversimplifying complex outcomes. How do you use narrative to communicate impact and accountability, while preserving nuance and long-term context?
Demonstrating impact is essential, but social change is rarely linear or attributable to a single intervention. The challenge is to use storytelling not to simplify reality, but to make complexity understandable.
- Anchor stories in evidence: Personal narratives are powerful entry points, but they should sit alongside data and context. A story can illustrate change in someone’s life, while reporting explains broader trends, limitations, and lessons learned. This balance helps audiences connect emotionally without losing sight of rigour.
- Be honest about timeframes: Systemic change often unfolds over years. Rather than presenting impact as a “before and after” transformation, NGOs can tell stories of progress, iteration, and adaptation. Sharing setbacks and course corrections builds trust and signals that accountability includes learning, not just success.
- Clarify contribution rather than claiming sole causation: Most development outcomes result from partnerships - governments, communities, private sector actors, and other civil society organisations. Storytelling that acknowledges this ecosystem avoids overstating impact and reinforces the collaborative nature of change.
- Preserve nuance through format: Long-form content, case studies, impact reports, and multimedia storytelling allow space for complexity. Even in shorter formats, careful framing - explaining structural barriers, policy contexts, and ongoing challenges - can prevent oversimplification.
When NGOs use storytelling to illuminate both human experience and systemic context, they strengthen public understanding and trust. Impact communication then becomes not just a showcase of results, but an honest reflection of progress, partnership, and purpose.
How are NGOs incorporating lived experience and community voices into storytelling, and what impact has this had on audience engagement and trust?
NGOs are recognising that credibility comes from creating space for communities to speak for themselves. Incorporating lived experience into storytelling is no longer a token gesture; it's becoming central to how organisations design campaigns, shape policy advocacy, and communicate impact.
Practically, this means moving from extractive storytelling to co-creation. Many NGOs now involve community members in identifying which stories are told, the framing, and the platforms used. Some are investing in training, equipment, and digital access so people can produce their own content, such as video diaries, social media takeovers, blogs, or community-led podcasts. Others are establishing advisory groups made up of people with lived experience to guide messaging and narrative strategy.
This shift also influences whose expertise is recognised. Lived experience is increasingly positioned alongside technical and policy expertise, particularly in advocacy campaigns. When people directly affected by an issue contribute to messaging or speak publicly about solutions, it strengthens authenticity and grounds policy debates in real-world realities.
These days, audiences are more discerning than ever and can sense when stories feel staged or overly curated. Community-led narratives tend to resonate more deeply and often generate higher engagement across digital platforms, fostering stronger emotional connection.
Incorporating lived experience also builds trust internally. When communities see their perspectives accurately reflected - and when they have agency in how they are represented - it reinforces partnership rather than hierarchy.
In a time of misinformation and declining trust in institutions, NGOs that centre lived experience are not just improving their communications; they are strengthening legitimacy. Storytelling grounded in authentic community voices signals transparency, respect, and shared ownership of change - qualities that are essential for sustained engagement and public confidence.
Emotional storytelling has long been used to build public support, but there are signs of audience fatigue and desensitisation to emotive appeals. How is storytelling strategy evolving in the NGO sector in response to this?
One shift is from crisis-driven narratives to solutions-focused storytelling. Instead of focusing solely on need, organisations are highlighting progress, innovation, and collective action. This doesn’t minimise the scale of challenges, but it offers audiences a sense of efficacy - showing that change is possible and that their support contributes to tangible outcomes.
There is also a move towards depth and authenticity, as audiences increasingly value transparency, nuance, and honesty over highly polished emotional appeals. NGOs are sharing more behind-the-scenes insights, lessons learned, and even setbacks, which helps build trust and long-term engagement rather than short-term reactions.
Another evolution is audience segmentation and platform sensitivity, with digital analytics helping organisations understand how communities respond to different tones and formats. Storytelling is becoming more tailored - interactive content, short-form video, long-form journalism, community takeovers - rather than relying on a single emotive formula.
Importantly, the sector is also interrogating power and representation. Stories that centre dignity, agency, and partnership tend to resonate more sustainably than those that rely on portraying people at their most vulnerable. Positive, human-centred narratives can inspire solidarity rather than pity.
Storytelling strategy is shifting from eliciting sympathy to building sustained relationships. Organisations that stand out combine emotional resonance with credibility, agency, and hope - engaging audiences as informed partners in long-term change, not just donors.
27 February 2026 6:15 AM
8 mins read
Moves
Amnesty International Australia has appointed Andrew Beswick as Strategic Communications Manager. After a long previous stint at Amnesty managing campaigns and communications up until 2016, he has returned to lead media strategy and digital comms for its human rights campaigns.
Following his earlier tenure, Andrew went on to work in senior roles across the not-for-profit and government sectors, including at Oxfam Australia, Wyndham City Council and National Disability Services.
27 February 2026 6:10 AM
1 min read