PR News
<span id="hs_cos_wrapper_name" class="hs_cos_wrapper hs_cos_wrapper_meta_field hs_cos_wrapper_type_text" style="" data-hs-cos-general-type="meta_field" data-hs-cos-type="text" >Telum Talks To: Carolyn Devanayagam and Hin-Yan Wong from Weber Shandwick</span>

Telum Talks To: Carolyn Devanayagam and Hin-Yan Wong from Weber Shandwick

In an era of increasingly erratic, escalating natural disasters, a solid and up-to-date crisis communications plan is critical in facilitating information transparency, stakeholder support, and reputation protection. Analytics and intelligence can further help strengthen comms during these high-stakes situations.

To explore the complexities around natural disaster comms responses, Telum Media spoke with Weber Shandwick's Carolyn Devanayagam, EVP, Head of Weber Advisory, APAC, and Hin-Yan Wong, EVP, Strategic Planning and Head, APAC Intelligence, to hear about best practices and the importance of data analytics in speedy, accurate, and human-centric crisis comms.

For organisations that don't yet have crisis communications plans in place for natural disasters, where should they begin?

Carolyn: In today's fast-paced information landscape, organisations must have crisis communications frameworks in place, especially in anticipation of natural disasters. Crises can emerge unexpectedly, and the speed of information transfer means organisations must be ready.

Start with a thorough risk assessment to identify natural disaster scenarios specific to your organisation's operational regions. This includes considering geographical vulnerabilities, historical disaster trends, and socio-political landscapes.

Checklist items at the Weber Advisory team include:

  • Stakeholder mapping: Identifying key internal and external stakeholders, such as employees, customers, government agencies, and the media.
  • Communication protocols: Establishing clear channels and protocols for effective information dissemination during crises.
  • Media training: Preparing spokespersons to ensure consistent and authoritative messaging.
  • Scenario planning: Conducting simulations of disaster scenarios to assess and improve the crisis plan's effectiveness.
  • Once established, these plans must be regularly reviewed and updated annually to keep pace with evolving risks and organisational changes.

What are the key principles for maintaining transparent comms and public trust during disasters, especially when information is limited, evolving, or at a standstill?

Carolyn: Transparent comms are absolutely critical. Communicators must ensure that they're providing:

  • Timely and accurate information: Provide regular updates, even when information is limited. Acknowledge uncertainties and commit to offering updates as new information emerges.
  • Consistent messaging: Ensure all comms channels deliver a unified message, preventing confusion and misinformation.
  • Empathy and reassurance: Demonstrate understanding and compassion for those affected, using language that conveys solidarity and concern.
  • Proactive engagement: Engage actively with stakeholders through various channels - social media, press releases, and community outreach - to address concerns and provide support.
  • For more effective strategic decision-making and stakeholder management, organisations can also implement comprehensive tracking methods, particularly within the first 48 hours of a crisis strike.

Analytics and intelligence can shape effective disaster comms - how can this support comms teams in real-time decision-making?

Hin-Yan: Real-time data from analytics and intelligence can help communicators respond quickly, accurately, and in a way that resonates with affected communities.

The first hours of a disaster are critical, and understanding public sentiment is paramount. Advanced analytics can track social media conversations, news coverage, and community reactions and gauge public sentiment in real-time. With data, comms teams can better adapt their messaging to either calm fears or provide urgent updates. For example, analytics can help identify sudden spikes in misinformation or panic early, allowing communicators to swiftly correct false narratives.

Analytics on audience behaviours, preferences, and regional sensitivities can also enable more targeted and culturally appropriate messages. In APAC, where cultural and language diversity is key, leveraging intelligence to craft region-specific messages can improve engagement and trust. Our A+I team uses audience segmentation models to understand different community needs and ensure relevant and empathetic messaging.

Analytics is also helpful for anticipating how a disaster may evolve so comms teams can prepare messaging strategies in advance, rather than reacting in a piecemeal manner. By analysing patterns from previous similar disasters, we can predict potential hotspots of concern or areas where misinformation might spread and proactively address issues before they escalate.

Lastly, A+I tools can monitor news cycles, social media, and governmental updates in real-time, which has helped our global teams remain agile through crises, ensuring that comms are aligned with the latest developments and that the right stakeholders are reached promptly.

How does predictive analytics help comms leaders prepare for post-disaster reputational risks, such as misinformation or stakeholder backlash?

Hin-Yan: By leveraging historical data, social media trends, and sentiment analysis, predictive analytics can help communicators foresee potential reputational challenges and develop proactive strategies to mitigate them.

One of the most significant post-disaster challenges is the rapid spread of misinformation, particularly on social media. Predictive analytics can model the likely trajectory of false narratives based on historical data from previous crises. By identifying emerging patterns in online discourse, comms teams can prepare to address misinformation before it spirals out of control.

These tools can also analyse sentiment trends across stakeholder groups. This data can help gauge how different segments of the public, the media, and key influencers might react to the disaster response, so leaders can prioritise communication efforts towards at-risk groups and manage emerging concerns proactively.

Predictive planning can also address reputational risks through mapping crisis scenarios that simulate how different responses or crises might impact reputation. Comms leaders can test different messaging approaches through data models to see which strategies can better mitigate reputational risks and maximise public trust. This proactive planning prepares organisations for different outcomes and reduces the need for reactive damage control.

Lastly, predictive analytics helps identify vulnerable stakeholder groups by segmenting key stakeholders - such as customers, investors, or local communities - based on their potential exposure to the crisis. By identifying those most likely to feel the impact of the disaster response or perceive a lack of transparency, comms teams can engage with them directly and offer tailored reassurance, ultimately safeguarding reputation.

Real-time data and predictive models keep crisis communications reactive and strategically anticipatory to protect client reputation in the face of unforeseen challenges.

What role does post-disaster comms play in rebuilding trust, demonstrating accountability, and supporting long-term recovery?

Carolyn and Hin-Yan: Post-disaster communications are vital in rebuilding trust and supporting long-term recovery. This includes:

  • Transparency and accountability: Clearly communicating the steps taken to address the disaster's impact, including any shortcomings and corrective actions implemented.
  • Continuous engagement: Maintaining open lines of communication with affected communities, providing updates on recovery efforts and timelines.
  • Supportive messaging: Using messaging that acknowledges the emotional toll of the disaster and offering support and resources to those affected.
  • Post-disaster communications should be an integrated approach that combines emotional intelligence with data insights to create compassionate and informative communications.


While employing data to inform recovery strategies and measure progress, communicators should also recognise the emotional impact that natural disasters have on individuals and communities and communicate with sensitivity and compassion.

What metrics matter most when evaluating disaster communications responses? How can these insights be used to strengthen future preparedness and response?

Hin-Yan: There are several key metrics that can help determine the efficacy of a disaster response.

The first is reach and engagement. Tracking how many people received and interacted with a message allows practitioners to gauge its effectiveness across channels and refine how future messages are crafted.

Equally important is sentiment analysis, which draws on social media conversations and media coverage to gauge public reaction to the response. These insights can help guide tone and content adjustments, while media coverage data can help identify effective channels.

Stakeholder feedback from customers, employees, and government representatives offers another valuable perspective, helping measure levels of trust and satisfaction.

Crisis resolution time is also critical, revealing how quickly issues were addressed and misinformation corrected. This highlights where operational processes could be improved.

Finally, assessing media coverage and PR outcomes - both the quantity and tone - provides insight into the overall impact of the messaging.

Together, these measures can directly inform future strategy, strengthening an organisation's preparedness and resilience for the next crisis.




Previous story

Singapore Tourism Board appoints PR agency for Hong Kong market

Next story

ValuationXchange names marcomms leader

You might also enjoy

Wala
Moves

Wala Amara takes on new challenge in Riyadh

Wala Amara has moved to Riyadh from Dubai and joined 54 as an Account Director. In her new role, she leads strategic communications efforts, focusing on driving narrative and visibility for sports and tourism clients in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Wala joined 54 from Seven Media, where she managed several sports campaigns. She has also worked with 777Partners and DAZN in the UK.

Interview:
Feature

Interview: Jackie Hanafie from Humankind Advisory

 Storytelling has long been central to NGO communications, but its role is evolving. It's no longer only about raising awareness or driving donations, but translating complex issues into human narratives that audiences can grasp and act on.

Telum Media spoke with Jackie Hanafie, Founder and Principal Consultant of Humankind Advisory, about how NGOs can rethink storytelling to influence policy and behaviour, embed ethics and lived experience into communications, balance impact with nuance and accountability, and adopt a more hopeful, human-centred approach.

Storytelling has traditionally helped NGOs drive awareness and donations. As it becomes a more strategic tool to shape public opinion and policy, how should organisations rethink its role in influencing narratives, behaviours, and systemic change?
In today’s crowded, fast-moving information landscape, storytelling should be treated as a strategic asset - shaping how issues are understood, who is seen as responsible, and what solutions feel possible.

That means rethinking storytelling as narrative infrastructure, not just content. Individual stories are powerful, but when they are connected to structural issues - policy gaps, market failures, social norms - they help audiences understand both the what and why. This shifts the focus from charity to justice, from sympathy to shared responsibility. A well-told story can humanise data, but it can also frame policy conversations and influence how decision-makers define the problem.

Storytelling should also shift away from victimhood. Traditional NGO communications often portray communities as passive recipients of aid, but effective storytelling highlights local leadership, resilience, and partnership. This reframes beneficiaries as changemakers rather than dependants. When audiences see dignity and capability, they are more likely to support long-term solutions rather than short-term fixes.

Storytelling should also be aligned with clear behavioural and policy objectives. Whether the goal is shifting public attitudes, influencing a legislative debate, or changing consumer behaviour, narratives should be designed with measurable outcomes in mind. This requires collaboration across communications, policy, and program teams.

When storytelling is strategic, ethical, and systems-focused, it becomes more than awareness-raising; it acts as a catalyst for lasting change.

NGOs often tell stories about underrepresented communities and issues with less power or visibility. How do you ensure these stories are told ethically and respectfully, and that the people involved have a say in how they are represented?
This is a big responsibility for NGOs and ethics must be embedded in the process rather than as a final sign-off before publication.

It starts with informed, ongoing consent - people understanding their story will be shared, where, how, why, and they can withdraw at any time. In a digital world where content can travel far beyond its original context, transparency is essential.

Participation should go beyond consent to collaboration, with communities having a say in story framing, details, and visual representation. This might mean sharing drafts, inviting feedback, co-creating content, or supporting people to tell their own stories. Ethical storytelling shifts from “about them” to “with them”.

Stories should highlight dignity, agency, and context - acknowledging structural barriers without reducing individuals to them, which can unintentionally strip away complexity, humanity, and agency. Safeguarding is also critical, particularly for people in fragile or politically sensitive environments. This includes assessing risks around visibility, privacy, cultural sensitivity, and potential backlash. Sometimes the most ethical choice is to anonymise or not tell a story at all.

Organisations should also create clear internal guidelines and accountability mechanisms around storytelling ethics. When communities are respected as collaborators of their narratives, storytelling becomes more authentic, credible, and powerful in driving meaningful change.

NGOs face pressure to demonstrate impact, but storytelling can risk oversimplifying complex outcomes. How do you use narrative to communicate impact and accountability, while preserving nuance and long-term context?
Demonstrating impact is essential, but social change is rarely linear or attributable to a single intervention. The challenge is to use storytelling not to simplify reality, but to make complexity understandable.

  • Anchor stories in evidence: Personal narratives are powerful entry points, but they should sit alongside data and context. A story can illustrate change in someone’s life, while reporting explains broader trends, limitations, and lessons learned. This balance helps audiences connect emotionally without losing sight of rigour.
  • Be honest about timeframes: Systemic change often unfolds over years. Rather than presenting impact as a “before and after” transformation, NGOs can tell stories of progress, iteration, and adaptation. Sharing setbacks and course corrections builds trust and signals that accountability includes learning, not just success.
  • Clarify contribution rather than claiming sole causation: Most development outcomes result from partnerships - governments, communities, private sector actors, and other civil society organisations. Storytelling that acknowledges this ecosystem avoids overstating impact and reinforces the collaborative nature of change.
  • Preserve nuance through format: Long-form content, case studies, impact reports, and multimedia storytelling allow space for complexity. Even in shorter formats, careful framing - explaining structural barriers, policy contexts, and ongoing challenges - can prevent oversimplification.

When NGOs use storytelling to illuminate both human experience and systemic context, they strengthen public understanding and trust. Impact communication then becomes not just a showcase of results, but an honest reflection of progress, partnership, and purpose.

How are NGOs incorporating lived experience and community voices into storytelling, and what impact has this had on audience engagement and trust?
NGOs are recognising that credibility comes from creating space for communities to speak for themselves. Incorporating lived experience into storytelling is no longer a token gesture; it's becoming central to how organisations design campaigns, shape policy advocacy, and communicate impact.

Practically, this means moving from extractive storytelling to co-creation. Many NGOs now involve community members in identifying which stories are told, the framing, and the platforms used. Some are investing in training, equipment, and digital access so people can produce their own content, such as video diaries, social media takeovers, blogs, or community-led podcasts. Others are establishing advisory groups made up of people with lived experience to guide messaging and narrative strategy.

This shift also influences whose expertise is recognised. Lived experience is increasingly positioned alongside technical and policy expertise, particularly in advocacy campaigns. When people directly affected by an issue contribute to messaging or speak publicly about solutions, it strengthens authenticity and grounds policy debates in real-world realities.

These days, audiences are more discerning than ever and can sense when stories feel staged or overly curated. Community-led narratives tend to resonate more deeply and often generate higher engagement across digital platforms, fostering stronger emotional connection.

Incorporating lived experience also builds trust internally. When communities see their perspectives accurately reflected - and when they have agency in how they are represented - it reinforces partnership rather than hierarchy.

In a time of misinformation and declining trust in institutions, NGOs that centre lived experience are not just improving their communications; they are strengthening legitimacy. Storytelling grounded in authentic community voices signals transparency, respect, and shared ownership of change - qualities that are essential for sustained engagement and public confidence.

Emotional storytelling has long been used to build public support, but there are signs of audience fatigue and desensitisation to emotive appeals. How is storytelling strategy evolving in the NGO sector in response to this?
One shift is from crisis-driven narratives to solutions-focused storytelling. Instead of focusing solely on need, organisations are highlighting progress, innovation, and collective action. This doesn’t minimise the scale of challenges, but it offers audiences a sense of efficacy - showing that change is possible and that their support contributes to tangible outcomes.

There is also a move towards depth and authenticity, as audiences increasingly value transparency, nuance, and honesty over highly polished emotional appeals. NGOs are sharing more behind-the-scenes insights, lessons learned, and even setbacks, which helps build trust and long-term engagement rather than short-term reactions.

Another evolution is audience segmentation and platform sensitivity, with digital analytics helping organisations understand how communities respond to different tones and formats. Storytelling is becoming more tailored - interactive content, short-form video, long-form journalism, community takeovers - rather than relying on a single emotive formula.

Importantly, the sector is also interrogating power and representation. Stories that centre dignity, agency, and partnership tend to resonate more sustainably than those that rely on portraying people at their most vulnerable. Positive, human-centred narratives can inspire solidarity rather than pity.

Storytelling strategy is shifting from eliciting sympathy to building sustained relationships. Organisations that stand out combine emotional resonance with credibility, agency, and hope - engaging audiences as informed partners in long-term change, not just donors. 

Amnesty
Moves

Amnesty International Australia welcomes back a familiar face

Amnesty International Australia has appointed Andrew Beswick as Strategic Communications Manager. After a long previous stint at Amnesty managing campaigns and communications up until 2016, he has returned to lead media strategy and digital comms for its human rights campaigns.

Following his earlier tenure, Andrew went on to work in senior roles across the not-for-profit and government sectors, including at Oxfam Australia, Wyndham City Council and National Disability Services.