PR News
<span id="hs_cos_wrapper_name" class="hs_cos_wrapper hs_cos_wrapper_meta_field hs_cos_wrapper_type_text" style="" data-hs-cos-general-type="meta_field" data-hs-cos-type="text" >Perspectives: Time to be brave</span>

Perspectives: Time to be brave

'Perspectives' is a Telum Media submitted article series, where diverse viewpoints spark thought-provoking conversations about the role of PR and communications in today's world. This Perspectives piece was submitted by Adam Harper, Founder & Managing Partner at Ashbury.

Tariff-driven market volatility means it’s time for financial communications teams to be more influential than ever. The companies that will achieve the best outcomes during this period will be those that are very proactive in understanding and managing risk, but which don’t freeze and just stop communicating.
 
Guarding reputation and influence through purpose-led communications
The tariffs are causing serious volatility and uncertainty in markets. My experience through other periods of dislocation is that normally rational people in financial institutions can start to panic because the experience is so far out of the ordinary.

And when they panic, they often start doing things - or wanting to do things - that are logical in a narrow way but are just bad ideas from a reputational perspective.

For example, people on a bank’s trading desk might want to make an optional announcement warning the market that they may not be able to fulfil an obligation to provide prices for a certain structured product because of a lack of underlying liquidity. It makes sense at one level because it appears to protect the bank from a potential criticism that it stopped providing prices without warning. In reality, of course, it’s not a good idea. That announcement would pour more fuel on the flames in a volatile market and should be avoided if at all possible.

Now more than ever, then, reputational risk management is a top priority for comms leaders in the financial sector. A statement or action that could pass by unnoticed at most other times is more likely to explode at a time like this. That means comms leaders have to be more vocal and visible than ever, wielding all the influence they can while keeping a cool head.

And these times are interesting because they force comms leaders to ask important questions, like what should I actually be taking a view on? Is it just my company’s communications strategy, or should I be making an argument to management on what the firm is doing with its clients and products, or how it’s engaging with regulators or investors? Where exactly are the limits of my influence?

My view is that, if you can understand the issue and have a thought-through opinion on it, then your stakeholders need to hear that. There should be no limits to your influence, although you will certainly come up against people from other disciplines with different views and you won’t have everything your own way. Any organisation that isn’t listening to its reputational specialists right now is needlessly increasing its risks.

Navigating stakeholder relations, trust building, and brand reputation
On the risk management side of the equation, comms teams need to be mapping these rapidly evolving risks and ensuring that they are ready to respond quickly when necessary. This is especially true of rumours, which proliferate in times of anxiety and can snowball fast, as we have seen with several digital bank runs in recent years. False rumours need to be met immediately and decisively with clarity and facts now; you can’t just refuse to dignify them with a response, which used to be the received wisdom.

In these uncertain times, though, there is also opportunity to build reputational equity. Audiences are naturally looking to brands they trust for expertise and guidance. That can create a lot of scope to use insight to build up a firm’s reputation and reassure its clients.

So it’s essential to understand what is most relevant to a given audience at this time. If you have good data on that, it’s easier to anticipate reputational risks and to connect with your audiences’ interests. At Ashbury, we’re making increasing use of our partnership with InferenceCloud, which provides AI-driven tools and insights, to ensure that clients’ communications strategies are relevant to their audience’s immediate and long-term interests.

What we’ve been seeing in some of the analysis we have run recently is that audiences are focused on what these changes mean for them in terms of long-term opportunity, as well as shorter-term challenges. For example, InferenceCloud data shows that export diversification to markets other than the US is top of mind for Asian companies and that institutional investors in the Middle East are engaged by discussions on increasing their investments in the US as well as about increasing their exposure to other regions. These kinds of insights can open up a lot of productive engagement opportunities.

Adam Harper is the Founder & Managing Partner at Ashbury, a technology-enabled strategic communications consultancy. Adam set up Ashbury in Hong Kong in 2020 to help financial sector clients and corporates engaging with financial audiences build intelligent reputations. The agency has since expanded to Singapore, Dubai and the UK to continue supporting organisations from global banks to FinTech companies in driving impactful comms in technology and sustainable finance.
Previous story

Perspectives: Navigating risk and building trust on local realities in a tariff-led world

Next story

Telum Talks To: Anna Stark and Tahira Matthews from STARK MATTHEWS

You might also enjoy

PixVerse
Moves

PixVerse appoints Head of Global PR

Robyn Tan has been named Head of Global PR at PixVerse, an AI video generation platform. Based in Singapore, she leads PR and media relations across international markets, and serves as Chief Representative of Singapore, overseeing on-ground presence and community relations in the region. 

Sefiani
Research

Sefiani unveils new research on AI visibility ownership

Strategic communications consultancy, Sefiani, part of Clarity Global, has released a new study indicating that 84 per cent of Australian marketing and comms leaders disagree on who "owns" AI visibility, while the remaining 16 per cent take an integrated approach.

Conducted by OnePoll on behalf of Sefiani, the research surveyed 150 marketing and communications leaders at Director level and above from organisations with more than 50 employees, exploring how strategies have been adapted in response to AI search.

According to the report, 91 per cent of cross-departmental leaders are revising their strategies to influence AI-driven discovery, although an internal "turf war" is emerging over who controls brands' AI search visibility. The research found that ownership currently sits across five functions: data / analytics (23 per cent), comms / corporate affairs (20 per cent), brand (19 per cent), digital (17 per cent), and performance (16 per cent), which the agency said reflects a structurally fragmented approach within many organisations.

The "silo" challenge
To complement its findings, Sefiani collected qualitative insights from leaders through a series of executive GEO-focused sessions and a recent panel moderated by Mandy Galmes, Managing Partner at Sefiani. Speakers included Johanna Lowe, Chief Marketing and Communications Officer at the University of Sydney; Brad Pogson, Head of Communications at Lendi Group; and Tom Telford, Chief Digital Officer at Clarity Global.

Based on these discussions, several themes emerged around managing reputation in AI-driven environments:

  • Internal silos as a key barrier: Participants noted that while some leaders are encouraging cross-functional experimentation, others remain 'nihilistic' about breaking down traditional departmental walls, leading to stalled effort and wasted budgets. The panel identified the rise of AI as a 'shadow task' layered on top of existing senior role requirements without removing previous duties, which further delays progress.
  • The forever life of reputational issues: According to panellists, LLMs draw on long-term patterns across coverage, reviews, forums, and owned content, meaning historic issues may continue resurfacing in AI-generated responses. This suggests that organisations might need to take a more data-led, cross-channel approach to finding, correcting, and rebalancing inaccurate information.
  • Quality content remains critical: Insights from the discussion indicated that AI models do not discriminate by content format, but they do reward depth. The findings suggest that high-quality, thought leadership content performs better within LLM training sets, so it should be considered as central to strategies across channels moving forward.

The cost of siloed GEO: Misinformation and reputational risk
The agency stated that a lack of clear ownership over GEO is already having tangible consequences. Based on the research, AI search was cited by leaders as the most structurally siloed channel, with 77 per cent reporting problems in the last 12 months. This included a slower response to issues, conflicting messages across channels, and AI tools amplifying yesterday's problems instead of today's narratives.

The study also found that the risk is compounded by the speed at which AI-generated misinformation can spread, with 25 per cent of leaders reporting that incorrect, inconsistent, or outdated brand information has already appeared in AI answers.

"Reputation used to be managed channel by channel, but AI search has changed the rules. Because these systems read across everything - earned coverage, on-site content, social signals, and search authority - siloed marketing and communications are quietly muting your AI visibility," said Tom Telford.

"When your channels don't tell the same story, or teams are chasing independent KPIs with separate budget pots, these silos also become a major reputational liability. It is only when functions are truly connected that the models become trained on a consistent brand message and compound visibility across AI services over time. This is the crux of GEO, Generative Engine Optimisation, and done well it becomes the multiplier on everything you already invest in brand, PR and digital."

The "citations race": PR and earned media take centre stage
The report also suggested that a shift toward AI-first discovery is changing budget priorities.

According to the findings, 49 per cent of leaders have already allocated five to 10 per cent of their marketing and communications budgets to AI visibility, with 90 per cent of that spend being reallocated from traditional channels like paid digital and brand. A further 30 per cent reported allocating up to 20 per cent of their budgets.

Citing external analysis from Gartner, the agency noted that the majority of sources referenced by AI systems are non-paid, which the report argues increases the strategic importance of PR and earned media in AI-driven discovery.

Mandy Galmes said: "When LLMs answer a question in your category, they’re drawing overwhelmingly on non-paid, third party sources. If your spokespeople, experts, case studies and proof points aren’t in those sources, you’re invisible at a key moment in the buyer journey." 

Royal
Moves

Royal Plaza on Scotts names marcomms director

Irwin Lim has been appointed Director of Marketing Communications at Royal Plaza on Scotts. In this role, he oversees brand, communications, content, campaigns, media relations, and marketing initiatives across the hotel’s key business areas.

Most recently, Irwin was Director of Marketing at Pan Pacific Orchard, Singapore.