'Perspectives' is a Telum Media submitted article series, where diverse viewpoints spark thought-provoking conversations about the role of PR and communications in today's world. This Perspectives piece was submitted by Adam Harper, Founder & Managing Partner at Ashbury.
Tariff-driven market volatility means it’s time for financial communications teams to be more influential than ever. The companies that will achieve the best outcomes during this period will be those that are very proactive in understanding and managing risk, but which don’t freeze and just stop communicating.
Guarding reputation and influence through purpose-led communications
The tariffs are causing serious volatility and uncertainty in markets. My experience through other periods of dislocation is that normally rational people in financial institutions can start to panic because the experience is so far out of the ordinary.
And when they panic, they often start doing things - or wanting to do things - that are logical in a narrow way but are just bad ideas from a reputational perspective.
For example, people on a bank’s trading desk might want to make an optional announcement warning the market that they may not be able to fulfil an obligation to provide prices for a certain structured product because of a lack of underlying liquidity. It makes sense at one level because it appears to protect the bank from a potential criticism that it stopped providing prices without warning. In reality, of course, it’s not a good idea. That announcement would pour more fuel on the flames in a volatile market and should be avoided if at all possible.
Now more than ever, then, reputational risk management is a top priority for comms leaders in the financial sector. A statement or action that could pass by unnoticed at most other times is more likely to explode at a time like this. That means comms leaders have to be more vocal and visible than ever, wielding all the influence they can while keeping a cool head.
And these times are interesting because they force comms leaders to ask important questions, like what should I actually be taking a view on? Is it just my company’s communications strategy, or should I be making an argument to management on what the firm is doing with its clients and products, or how it’s engaging with regulators or investors? Where exactly are the limits of my influence?
My view is that, if you can understand the issue and have a thought-through opinion on it, then your stakeholders need to hear that. There should be no limits to your influence, although you will certainly come up against people from other disciplines with different views and you won’t have everything your own way. Any organisation that isn’t listening to its reputational specialists right now is needlessly increasing its risks.
Navigating stakeholder relations, trust building, and brand reputation
On the risk management side of the equation, comms teams need to be mapping these rapidly evolving risks and ensuring that they are ready to respond quickly when necessary. This is especially true of rumours, which proliferate in times of anxiety and can snowball fast, as we have seen with several digital bank runs in recent years. False rumours need to be met immediately and decisively with clarity and facts now; you can’t just refuse to dignify them with a response, which used to be the received wisdom.
In these uncertain times, though, there is also opportunity to build reputational equity. Audiences are naturally looking to brands they trust for expertise and guidance. That can create a lot of scope to use insight to build up a firm’s reputation and reassure its clients.
So it’s essential to understand what is most relevant to a given audience at this time. If you have good data on that, it’s easier to anticipate reputational risks and to connect with your audiences’ interests. At Ashbury, we’re making increasing use of our partnership with InferenceCloud, which provides AI-driven tools and insights, to ensure that clients’ communications strategies are relevant to their audience’s immediate and long-term interests.
What we’ve been seeing in some of the analysis we have run recently is that audiences are focused on what these changes mean for them in terms of long-term opportunity, as well as shorter-term challenges. For example, InferenceCloud data shows that export diversification to markets other than the US is top of mind for Asian companies and that institutional investors in the Middle East are engaged by discussions on increasing their investments in the US as well as about increasing their exposure to other regions. These kinds of insights can open up a lot of productive engagement opportunities.
Adam Harper is the Founder & Managing Partner at Ashbury, a technology-enabled strategic communications consultancy. Adam set up Ashbury in Hong Kong in 2020 to help financial sector clients and corporates engaging with financial audiences build intelligent reputations. The agency has since expanded to Singapore, Dubai and the UK to continue supporting organisations from global banks to FinTech companies in driving impactful comms in technology and sustainable finance.
Feature
Perspectives: Time to be brave
by Telum Media
27 April 2025 4:00 PM
5 mins read
Telum Media creating connections
Get in touch to learn more
You might also enjoy
Moves
Wala Amara has moved to Riyadh from Dubai and joined 54 as an Account Director. In her new role, she leads strategic communications efforts, focusing on driving narrative and visibility for sports and tourism clients in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Wala joined 54 from Seven Media, where she managed several sports campaigns. She has also worked with 777Partners and DAZN in the UK.
27 February 2026 6:17 AM
1 min read
Feature
Storytelling has long been central to NGO communications, but its role is evolving. It's no longer only about raising awareness or driving donations, but translating complex issues into human narratives that audiences can grasp and act on.
Telum Media spoke with Jackie Hanafie, Founder and Principal Consultant of Humankind Advisory, about how NGOs can rethink storytelling to influence policy and behaviour, embed ethics and lived experience into communications, balance impact with nuance and accountability, and adopt a more hopeful, human-centred approach.
Storytelling has traditionally helped NGOs drive awareness and donations. As it becomes a more strategic tool to shape public opinion and policy, how should organisations rethink its role in influencing narratives, behaviours, and systemic change?
In today’s crowded, fast-moving information landscape, storytelling should be treated as a strategic asset - shaping how issues are understood, who is seen as responsible, and what solutions feel possible.
That means rethinking storytelling as narrative infrastructure, not just content. Individual stories are powerful, but when they are connected to structural issues - policy gaps, market failures, social norms - they help audiences understand both the what and why. This shifts the focus from charity to justice, from sympathy to shared responsibility. A well-told story can humanise data, but it can also frame policy conversations and influence how decision-makers define the problem.
Storytelling should also shift away from victimhood. Traditional NGO communications often portray communities as passive recipients of aid, but effective storytelling highlights local leadership, resilience, and partnership. This reframes beneficiaries as changemakers rather than dependants. When audiences see dignity and capability, they are more likely to support long-term solutions rather than short-term fixes.
Storytelling should also be aligned with clear behavioural and policy objectives. Whether the goal is shifting public attitudes, influencing a legislative debate, or changing consumer behaviour, narratives should be designed with measurable outcomes in mind. This requires collaboration across communications, policy, and program teams.
When storytelling is strategic, ethical, and systems-focused, it becomes more than awareness-raising; it acts as a catalyst for lasting change.
NGOs often tell stories about underrepresented communities and issues with less power or visibility. How do you ensure these stories are told ethically and respectfully, and that the people involved have a say in how they are represented?
This is a big responsibility for NGOs and ethics must be embedded in the process rather than as a final sign-off before publication.
It starts with informed, ongoing consent - people understanding their story will be shared, where, how, why, and they can withdraw at any time. In a digital world where content can travel far beyond its original context, transparency is essential.
Participation should go beyond consent to collaboration, with communities having a say in story framing, details, and visual representation. This might mean sharing drafts, inviting feedback, co-creating content, or supporting people to tell their own stories. Ethical storytelling shifts from “about them” to “with them”.
Stories should highlight dignity, agency, and context - acknowledging structural barriers without reducing individuals to them, which can unintentionally strip away complexity, humanity, and agency. Safeguarding is also critical, particularly for people in fragile or politically sensitive environments. This includes assessing risks around visibility, privacy, cultural sensitivity, and potential backlash. Sometimes the most ethical choice is to anonymise or not tell a story at all.
Organisations should also create clear internal guidelines and accountability mechanisms around storytelling ethics. When communities are respected as collaborators of their narratives, storytelling becomes more authentic, credible, and powerful in driving meaningful change.
NGOs face pressure to demonstrate impact, but storytelling can risk oversimplifying complex outcomes. How do you use narrative to communicate impact and accountability, while preserving nuance and long-term context?
Demonstrating impact is essential, but social change is rarely linear or attributable to a single intervention. The challenge is to use storytelling not to simplify reality, but to make complexity understandable.
- Anchor stories in evidence: Personal narratives are powerful entry points, but they should sit alongside data and context. A story can illustrate change in someone’s life, while reporting explains broader trends, limitations, and lessons learned. This balance helps audiences connect emotionally without losing sight of rigour.
- Be honest about timeframes: Systemic change often unfolds over years. Rather than presenting impact as a “before and after” transformation, NGOs can tell stories of progress, iteration, and adaptation. Sharing setbacks and course corrections builds trust and signals that accountability includes learning, not just success.
- Clarify contribution rather than claiming sole causation: Most development outcomes result from partnerships - governments, communities, private sector actors, and other civil society organisations. Storytelling that acknowledges this ecosystem avoids overstating impact and reinforces the collaborative nature of change.
- Preserve nuance through format: Long-form content, case studies, impact reports, and multimedia storytelling allow space for complexity. Even in shorter formats, careful framing - explaining structural barriers, policy contexts, and ongoing challenges - can prevent oversimplification.
When NGOs use storytelling to illuminate both human experience and systemic context, they strengthen public understanding and trust. Impact communication then becomes not just a showcase of results, but an honest reflection of progress, partnership, and purpose.
How are NGOs incorporating lived experience and community voices into storytelling, and what impact has this had on audience engagement and trust?
NGOs are recognising that credibility comes from creating space for communities to speak for themselves. Incorporating lived experience into storytelling is no longer a token gesture; it's becoming central to how organisations design campaigns, shape policy advocacy, and communicate impact.
Practically, this means moving from extractive storytelling to co-creation. Many NGOs now involve community members in identifying which stories are told, the framing, and the platforms used. Some are investing in training, equipment, and digital access so people can produce their own content, such as video diaries, social media takeovers, blogs, or community-led podcasts. Others are establishing advisory groups made up of people with lived experience to guide messaging and narrative strategy.
This shift also influences whose expertise is recognised. Lived experience is increasingly positioned alongside technical and policy expertise, particularly in advocacy campaigns. When people directly affected by an issue contribute to messaging or speak publicly about solutions, it strengthens authenticity and grounds policy debates in real-world realities.
These days, audiences are more discerning than ever and can sense when stories feel staged or overly curated. Community-led narratives tend to resonate more deeply and often generate higher engagement across digital platforms, fostering stronger emotional connection.
Incorporating lived experience also builds trust internally. When communities see their perspectives accurately reflected - and when they have agency in how they are represented - it reinforces partnership rather than hierarchy.
In a time of misinformation and declining trust in institutions, NGOs that centre lived experience are not just improving their communications; they are strengthening legitimacy. Storytelling grounded in authentic community voices signals transparency, respect, and shared ownership of change - qualities that are essential for sustained engagement and public confidence.
Emotional storytelling has long been used to build public support, but there are signs of audience fatigue and desensitisation to emotive appeals. How is storytelling strategy evolving in the NGO sector in response to this?
One shift is from crisis-driven narratives to solutions-focused storytelling. Instead of focusing solely on need, organisations are highlighting progress, innovation, and collective action. This doesn’t minimise the scale of challenges, but it offers audiences a sense of efficacy - showing that change is possible and that their support contributes to tangible outcomes.
There is also a move towards depth and authenticity, as audiences increasingly value transparency, nuance, and honesty over highly polished emotional appeals. NGOs are sharing more behind-the-scenes insights, lessons learned, and even setbacks, which helps build trust and long-term engagement rather than short-term reactions.
Another evolution is audience segmentation and platform sensitivity, with digital analytics helping organisations understand how communities respond to different tones and formats. Storytelling is becoming more tailored - interactive content, short-form video, long-form journalism, community takeovers - rather than relying on a single emotive formula.
Importantly, the sector is also interrogating power and representation. Stories that centre dignity, agency, and partnership tend to resonate more sustainably than those that rely on portraying people at their most vulnerable. Positive, human-centred narratives can inspire solidarity rather than pity.
Storytelling strategy is shifting from eliciting sympathy to building sustained relationships. Organisations that stand out combine emotional resonance with credibility, agency, and hope - engaging audiences as informed partners in long-term change, not just donors.
27 February 2026 6:15 AM
8 mins read
Moves
Amnesty International Australia has appointed Andrew Beswick as Strategic Communications Manager. After a long previous stint at Amnesty managing campaigns and communications up until 2016, he has returned to lead media strategy and digital comms for its human rights campaigns.
Following his earlier tenure, Andrew went on to work in senior roles across the not-for-profit and government sectors, including at Oxfam Australia, Wyndham City Council and National Disability Services.
27 February 2026 6:10 AM
1 min read