PR News
<span id="hs_cos_wrapper_name" class="hs_cos_wrapper hs_cos_wrapper_meta_field hs_cos_wrapper_type_text" style="" data-hs-cos-general-type="meta_field" data-hs-cos-type="text" >Telum Talks To: Anna Stark and Tahira Matthews from STARK MATTHEWS</span>

Telum Talks To: Anna Stark and Tahira Matthews from STARK MATTHEWS

Like any other industry, the beauty sector has evolved at a rapid rate over the years and is now valued at approximately $650 billion. As the industry has grown, PR strategies have also transformed, adapting to new trends and challenges.

To explore the evolution of beauty PR, we had a chat with Anna Stark and Tahira Matthews, Co-Founders and Directors of STARK MATTHEWS, who recently celebrated their agency’s 10-year anniversary. Our conversation touched on the shift into digital-first landscape, the involvement of celebrities and influencers, and common misconceptions.


Having been specialists in the beauty PR scene for more than 10 years, how has the industry evolved and what's one thing you don't miss that's been phased out?
When we first started our agency, from a client perspective, it was all about traditional media. While we'd encourage our clients to think digital and social media first, they'd often consider traditional media like print magazines, newspapers, and TV as the ultimate gold standard. Now, it's not just digital and social, engaging and authentic lo-fi brand-owned content is integral to shaping consumer conversations and driving brand love.

From a beauty industry perspective, there are just so many more beauty brands entering the market, and it's never been more saturated. To survive what we call the "Beauty Hunger Games", brands need more than just great products - they need to create an emotional connection with consumers in a way that feels personal and memorable. This need to create two-way connections has driven the rise of consumer activations, taking the brand personality from the screen to the streets, and now playing a key role in overarching PR strategies for many of our clients.

The thing we don't miss? Clients wanting year-long PR strategies. They'd sign off on our big, long strategy at the beginning of the year, and then we just implement the plans throughout the year. Boring! Clients now allow us to be so much more dynamic and responsive to shifting consumer trends and perceptions, resulting in much more impact and a greater ROI.

In today's digital-first landscape, how important are traditional media and physical brand activations in the world of beauty PR?
Brand activations are now more important than ever. When we started our agency 10 years ago, consumer activations were called "experiential" and were few and far between. Now, they play a crucial role.

In an increasingly digital world, people crave real, tangible experiences more than ever. With the sheer volume of beauty brands in the market, creating a real-world, sensory experience is one of the most powerful ways to form an emotional connection with consumers. Whether it's a beautifully curated event, a hands-on masterclass, or a strategic sampling campaign, in-person moments cut through digital noise and leave a lasting impression.

So, for the past few years, in addition to the media and influencer events, we now create so many consumer-driven immersive events, sampling campaigns, and interactive pop-ups. They create moments that spark conversation, build brand love, and turn consumers into true advocates.

While social media and digital content have changed the way consumers discover and engage with brands, traditional media still holds weight, particularly in building credibility and trust. A strong feature in a leading magazine or newspaper can carry a level of authority that’s hard to replicate online.

So, while strategies have absolutely evolved to be more digitally integrated, the most effective beauty PR today is a blend of both - leveraging traditional media for credibility, digital for reach, and physical activations for real-world impact. It's not about choosing one over the other, but about finding the right mix to create meaningful brand engagement.

With consumers demanding more authenticity in PR, do you find that micro and nano influencers offer better engagement and trust compared to celebrity endorsements? Or does star power still hold weight in beauty PR?
Authenticity is everything in PR, and micro and nano influencers have become incredibly powerful in driving engagement and trust. Their audiences tend to be more niche, loyal, and highly engaged, which makes their recommendations feel personal and credible - like hearing from a friend. Consumers are savvy, and they can spot when something feels overly polished or inauthentic, which is why smaller creators often resonate so well.

That said, star power still holds weight - it just depends on how it's used. A big-name influencer or celebrity endorsement alone isn't enough any more; it has to feel organic and aligned with the brand’s values. The most successful beauty partnerships today are the ones with a genuine connection, whether that's someone who has a long-standing love for a product or someone who plays an active role in a brand's storytelling.

Ultimately, it's not about one replacing the other - it's about balance. Micro and nano influencers offer deep engagement and trust, while macro influencers and celebrities can deliver broad awareness and cultural relevance. The real magic happens when a brand leverages both strategically to create impact across different audience touchpoints.

Since influencers and celebrities play a key role in beauty PR nowadays, there's always a risk of controversy. How do you navigate potential backlash when an influencer or ambassador comes under fire, and what steps should brands take to protect themselves from reputational damage?
We always start with our due diligence. We take a strategic, thoughtful approach long before partnering with any influencer or celebrity to ensure there's strong alignment between the influencer’s values and the brand's values from the very beginning. We make it a priority to carefully vet each potential partner - not just looking at their audience size, but understanding their personal values, past behaviour, and how they engage with their followers.

We then set clear expectations from the start, both in terms of the work itself and how the influencer conducts themselves publicly. Contracts include ethical guidelines, and we make sure both sides are on the same page when it comes to public statements or behaviour.

Another key piece of this is monitoring the influencer's activity and overall reputation continuously. That way, if anything does shift or seems off, we can take quick action - whether it's having a conversation with the influencer or adjusting (or worst case, terminating) the partnership early on.

What's a common misconception about working in beauty PR, and what’s the reality that people don’t often see?
Haha - easy - that it's all about glamorous events, mingling with celebs, red carpets, and fancy product launches. And while those moments are fun and exciting, the reality is that most of our work happens behind the scenes.

We always have this conversation with newcomers to the industry. It's a lot of strategy, relationship-building, and constant problem-solving. What people don't always see is the amount of groundwork that goes into making those high-profile moments possible. There's a LOT of attention to detail and behind-the-scenes coordination.

The industry can be fast-paced and ever-changing, which means we're always thinking ahead - anticipating trends, managing crisis situations, and working closely with brands to shape their narratives in a way that feels authentic.

It's a balance of creativity and strategy that takes a lot of dedication and hard work.
Previous story

Perspectives: Time to be brave

Next story

DARKHORSE NZ promotes team member to Business Director

You might also enjoy

Emma
Moves

Emma Lowde takes up new opportunity in the tech sector

Emma Lowde has started as Senior Communications Manager at Diraq, a Sydney-founded quantum computing company developing silicon-based technology to make quantum computers scalable, economical, and widely accessible. She joins from Intuit, where she was most recently Senior Communications Manager for the APAC region.

Emma has built up 15 years’ experience as a communications professional, including leadership roles at eBay Australia and New Zealand, following agency roles in Australia and the UK. 

Are
Feature

Are media releases dead? What 10,000 journalists told us they want from PR Teams in 2026

Every few years, someone declares the death of the media release.

Today, the arguments sound familiar. Journalists don't read them anymore. Everything is social-first. AI is replacing traditional media outreach. It's all about the pitch. Press releases are becoming little more than AI-generated filler.

And yet, when we speak with journalists across Asia Pacific and the Middle East, a different picture emerges.

Media releases aren't dead, but expectations around them have changed significantly.

We've analysed more than 10,000 Journalist Interest Survey responses in the Telum Media platform collected over the past five years, alongside insights gathered from conversations with editors, reporters, and producers across the region.

Key takeaways:

  1. Journalists still value useful PR content
  2. Relevance matters more than reach
  3. The pitch and the release serve different roles
  4. The best releases reduce friction for journalists
  5. Modern releases need to support multiple platforms

The conclusion is clear: journalists still value media releases, but they value them for different reasons than they once did.

The media release has evolved from a distribution tool into something far more strategic.

The media release is no longer the story

For decades, many PR professionals treated the media release as the centrepiece of media relations activity.

Write the release. Send it widely. Hope for coverage - “spray and pray”.

That approach was far from perfect, but you could get away with it in an era when newsrooms were larger, competition for attention was lower, and journalists had more time to evaluate incoming information.

Today's reality is very different.

Journalists are producing content across multiple platforms, often with smaller teams and tighter deadlines. Their inboxes are flooded with pitches, announcements, thought leadership submissions, and increasingly, AI-generated content.

As a result, journalists have become far more selective about what earns their attention.

The modern media release is no longer just about news stories. It has become a source-of-truth asset, a newsroom resource, and a content hub that supports broader communications activity.

The best PR teams understand this shift.

“The strongest message from journalists can be summarised in a single phrase: ‘Understand what I cover’. Relevance remains the most important factor in successful media engagement.”

What journalists are actually rejecting

One of the most revealing findings from our analysis is that journalists are not rejecting PR content altogether.

What they're rejecting is low-value outreach.

Across thousands of responses, the same frustrations appeared repeatedly:

    • Irrelevant pitches
    • Generic outreach
    • Mass distribution
    • Weak story angles
    • Excessive follow-ups

In other words, this is less a rejection of media releases and more a rejection of poor media relations practice.

The strongest message from journalists can be summarised in a single phrase:

"Understand what I cover."

Relevance remains the most important factor in successful media engagement. In fact, our journalist surveys over the past two years have seen a sharp increase in a desire for both relevance and personalisation in pitches.

Journalists increasingly assess pitches within seconds. If the connection to their beat, audience, or current priorities isn't immediately obvious, the opportunity is often lost before the email is even opened.

The pitch and the release have different jobs

One of the biggest misconceptions in modern media relations is treating the pitch and the release as the same thing.

They are not.

The pitch exists to earn attention; the release exists to support the story.

The best pitches are:

    • Brief
    • Human
    • Relevant
    • Contextual
    • Conversational

The best releases are:

    • Structured
    • Factual
    • Complete
    • Reusable
    • Easy to reference

At a recent Telum Media event, a senior journalist described the fastest way to kill a pitch with a single word: “Respect”. Or a lack thereof.

A generic greeting. A story unrelated to their beat. A mass-produced email that demonstrates no understanding of their audience.

All signal a lack of respect for the journalist's time and expertise.

High-performing PR teams increasingly write pitches and releases for different audiences. The pitch is written for the journalist. The release is written for the journalist's audience.

That distinction matters.

Why journalists still value media releases

Despite predictions of their demise, journalists continue to actively request media releases.

But they want releases that help them work more efficiently.

The most common requests include concise writing, clear headlines, strong news angles, supporting data (with downloadable images and assets), spokesperson access, and easy-to-use formats.

These preferences reveal the modern role of the release: it functions as a workflow tool.

A strong release helps journalists:

    • Understand the story quickly
    • Verify information
    • Access supporting materials
    • Build content efficiently

The best releases reduce friction. And in today's newsroom environment, reducing friction is often more valuable than generating hype.

Think beyond media coverage

Another major shift is that media releases are increasingly serving multiple audiences.

A modern release doesn’t just support journalists; it might also support clients and prospects, employees, investors and analysts, partners, and search visibility.

Rather than creating a single-use document, leading communications teams are building content ecosystems.

The release becomes the foundation for:

    • Media outreach
    • Newsroom content
    • Executive communications
    • Social media content
    • Email campaigns
    • Sales collateral
    • Thought leadership activity

This approach not only improves consistency but also increases the return on investment from every announcement.

Media Releases - Releases today

The role of the modern media release

 

Not every story needs a release

Perhaps one of the most important lessons is recognising when a media release is the wrong tool.

Releases tend to perform best when there is:

    • Genuine news value
    • Multiple stakeholder audiences
    • A need for factual consistency
    • Strong supporting assets
    • Broader business significance

They are often less effective for internal milestones framed as major news (or self-congratulatory announcements), generic thought leadership, and untargeted mass outreach.

In some situations, a targeted pitch, LinkedIn strategy, executive commentary programme, or direct relationship-based outreach may be more effective.

Good communications strategy isn't about defaulting to a media release; it's about choosing the right tool for the objective.

A framework for modern media releases

If there is one word that captures what journalists are asking for today, it is respect.

At Telum Media, we summarise this through the RESPECT framework:

R – Relevance
Make it relevant to the journalist, their audience and the moment.

E – Efficiency
Help journalists work faster through clear, concise, and usable content.

S – Substance
Provide genuine value through expertise, data, insight, or access.

P – Personalisation
Demonstrate that you've done your homework.

E – Ecosystem
Think beyond the release and consider how it supports broader communications goals.

C – Clarity
Make the key message immediately obvious.

T – Timing
Reach out at the right time, not simply any time.

Media Releases - RESPECT

What journalists are asking for in a pitch / media release: RESPECT

 

The future of the media release

The debate over whether media releases are dead misses the point.

The more useful question is how do we make releases work better in today’s media environment?

Journalists still value relevant information, credible sources, strong story angles, and efficient communication. Media releases continue to play an important role in delivering those things.

But success today depends less on the existence of the release itself and more on how strategically it is used.

The media release remains a valuable communications tool.

Just not in the way many of us were taught to use it.

 

FAQs

Are media releases still useful in 2026?

Yes. Journalists still value media releases, but these days want targeted outreach, relevance to their beat, alignment with their audience, and contextual pitching.

What makes a media release useful to journalists?

Journalists are looking for releases in a format that helps them work efficiently. Which means releases that are concise, factual, with a clear angle, contain usable quotes, and come with downloadable assets and supporting data.

What is the difference between a pitch and a media release?

A pitch earns the journalist’s attention in their cluttered Inbox. A media release supports the story by providing structured, factual, and reusable information relevant to their audience.

 

With more than 30 years’ experience spanning journalism, corporate communications and media intelligence, Reuben Aitchison is Telum Media’s Head of Insights and Communications.

Explore Telum Media tools that help PR teams pitch with precision. 

Rika
Moves

Rika Rufina promoted to Communications Manager

PR and communications agency, Wrights, has promoted Rika Rufina to Communication Manager, strengthening the agency’s integrated communications, issues management, and Asia Pacific capabilities.

Rika will help steer corporate and consumer retainer accounts, bringing together PR, social, and creative campaigns. She will also work with Chief Executive Officer Douglas Wright and General Manager Reena Llanillo to develop and implement issues management strategies.

Rika joined Wrights in August 2025 as a Senior Communication Consultant, bringing experience from PR agencies, as well as from in-house roles across APAC, particularly in the Singapore market.

Douglas said Rika’s promotion reflected the contribution she had made to the agency and its clients.

“Rika has delivered strong results. I look forward to working closer with her and the Wrights team as we continue to deliver ingenious and impactful communications, anchored in authenticity and positive change,” he said.

“Our secret sauce is simple: ingenious thinking, brought to life by a talented and ambitious team. Rika’s promotion is another important step in strengthening our team and setting Wrights up for its next phase of growth.”

The promotion forms part of a broader period of growth for Wrights, with the agency also promoting Charlotte Dickson to Communication Consultant and will welcome Annabel Chambers as PR and Social Coordinator.