PR News
<span id="hs_cos_wrapper_name" class="hs_cos_wrapper hs_cos_wrapper_meta_field hs_cos_wrapper_type_text" style="" data-hs-cos-general-type="meta_field" data-hs-cos-type="text" >Telum Talks To: Anna Stark and Tahira Matthews from STARK MATTHEWS</span>

Telum Talks To: Anna Stark and Tahira Matthews from STARK MATTHEWS

Like any other industry, the beauty sector has evolved at a rapid rate over the years and is now valued at approximately $650 billion. As the industry has grown, PR strategies have also transformed, adapting to new trends and challenges.

To explore the evolution of beauty PR, we had a chat with Anna Stark and Tahira Matthews, Co-Founders and Directors of STARK MATTHEWS, who recently celebrated their agency’s 10-year anniversary. Our conversation touched on the shift into digital-first landscape, the involvement of celebrities and influencers, and common misconceptions.


Having been specialists in the beauty PR scene for more than 10 years, how has the industry evolved and what's one thing you don't miss that's been phased out?
When we first started our agency, from a client perspective, it was all about traditional media. While we'd encourage our clients to think digital and social media first, they'd often consider traditional media like print magazines, newspapers, and TV as the ultimate gold standard. Now, it's not just digital and social, engaging and authentic lo-fi brand-owned content is integral to shaping consumer conversations and driving brand love.

From a beauty industry perspective, there are just so many more beauty brands entering the market, and it's never been more saturated. To survive what we call the "Beauty Hunger Games", brands need more than just great products - they need to create an emotional connection with consumers in a way that feels personal and memorable. This need to create two-way connections has driven the rise of consumer activations, taking the brand personality from the screen to the streets, and now playing a key role in overarching PR strategies for many of our clients.

The thing we don't miss? Clients wanting year-long PR strategies. They'd sign off on our big, long strategy at the beginning of the year, and then we just implement the plans throughout the year. Boring! Clients now allow us to be so much more dynamic and responsive to shifting consumer trends and perceptions, resulting in much more impact and a greater ROI.

In today's digital-first landscape, how important are traditional media and physical brand activations in the world of beauty PR?
Brand activations are now more important than ever. When we started our agency 10 years ago, consumer activations were called "experiential" and were few and far between. Now, they play a crucial role.

In an increasingly digital world, people crave real, tangible experiences more than ever. With the sheer volume of beauty brands in the market, creating a real-world, sensory experience is one of the most powerful ways to form an emotional connection with consumers. Whether it's a beautifully curated event, a hands-on masterclass, or a strategic sampling campaign, in-person moments cut through digital noise and leave a lasting impression.

So, for the past few years, in addition to the media and influencer events, we now create so many consumer-driven immersive events, sampling campaigns, and interactive pop-ups. They create moments that spark conversation, build brand love, and turn consumers into true advocates.

While social media and digital content have changed the way consumers discover and engage with brands, traditional media still holds weight, particularly in building credibility and trust. A strong feature in a leading magazine or newspaper can carry a level of authority that’s hard to replicate online.

So, while strategies have absolutely evolved to be more digitally integrated, the most effective beauty PR today is a blend of both - leveraging traditional media for credibility, digital for reach, and physical activations for real-world impact. It's not about choosing one over the other, but about finding the right mix to create meaningful brand engagement.

With consumers demanding more authenticity in PR, do you find that micro and nano influencers offer better engagement and trust compared to celebrity endorsements? Or does star power still hold weight in beauty PR?
Authenticity is everything in PR, and micro and nano influencers have become incredibly powerful in driving engagement and trust. Their audiences tend to be more niche, loyal, and highly engaged, which makes their recommendations feel personal and credible - like hearing from a friend. Consumers are savvy, and they can spot when something feels overly polished or inauthentic, which is why smaller creators often resonate so well.

That said, star power still holds weight - it just depends on how it's used. A big-name influencer or celebrity endorsement alone isn't enough any more; it has to feel organic and aligned with the brand’s values. The most successful beauty partnerships today are the ones with a genuine connection, whether that's someone who has a long-standing love for a product or someone who plays an active role in a brand's storytelling.

Ultimately, it's not about one replacing the other - it's about balance. Micro and nano influencers offer deep engagement and trust, while macro influencers and celebrities can deliver broad awareness and cultural relevance. The real magic happens when a brand leverages both strategically to create impact across different audience touchpoints.

Since influencers and celebrities play a key role in beauty PR nowadays, there's always a risk of controversy. How do you navigate potential backlash when an influencer or ambassador comes under fire, and what steps should brands take to protect themselves from reputational damage?
We always start with our due diligence. We take a strategic, thoughtful approach long before partnering with any influencer or celebrity to ensure there's strong alignment between the influencer’s values and the brand's values from the very beginning. We make it a priority to carefully vet each potential partner - not just looking at their audience size, but understanding their personal values, past behaviour, and how they engage with their followers.

We then set clear expectations from the start, both in terms of the work itself and how the influencer conducts themselves publicly. Contracts include ethical guidelines, and we make sure both sides are on the same page when it comes to public statements or behaviour.

Another key piece of this is monitoring the influencer's activity and overall reputation continuously. That way, if anything does shift or seems off, we can take quick action - whether it's having a conversation with the influencer or adjusting (or worst case, terminating) the partnership early on.

What's a common misconception about working in beauty PR, and what’s the reality that people don’t often see?
Haha - easy - that it's all about glamorous events, mingling with celebs, red carpets, and fancy product launches. And while those moments are fun and exciting, the reality is that most of our work happens behind the scenes.

We always have this conversation with newcomers to the industry. It's a lot of strategy, relationship-building, and constant problem-solving. What people don't always see is the amount of groundwork that goes into making those high-profile moments possible. There's a LOT of attention to detail and behind-the-scenes coordination.

The industry can be fast-paced and ever-changing, which means we're always thinking ahead - anticipating trends, managing crisis situations, and working closely with brands to shape their narratives in a way that feels authentic.

It's a balance of creativity and strategy that takes a lot of dedication and hard work.
Previous story

Perspectives: Time to be brave

Next story

DARKHORSE NZ promotes team member to Business Director

You might also enjoy

Leadership
Moves

Leadership appointment at FleishmanHillard Singapore

Aaron Tan has joined FleishmanHillard as Auto Practice Lead and Account Director, bringing experience across branding, communications, marketing and digital strategy.


Based in Singapore, he has accumulated more than 15 years of experience, having previously held senior roles at agencies including The Ate Group and W Communications.

Study
Research

Study Highlight: Beyond ESG: Global perspectives on communicating impact

PROI has released their latest report, "Beyond ESG: Global perspectives on communicating impact". With insights from 11 global communications agencies, the report highlights key trends shaping how ESG and purpose will be communicated in 2026.

Ted Deutsch, Executive Managing Director of RF|Binder and Chair of PROI's ESG Working Group, said: "While certain markets are shying away from acronyms and terms that are seen as overly political, this PROI report confirms that companies are still focused on driving change through sustainability, corporate culture and good governance. The challenge now lies in communicating this with authenticity."

ESG across the regions
ESG maturity differs widely by region. Markets such as Australia, Switzerland, and the Middle East operate in relatively advanced regulatory environments. In Australia especially, Paula Cowan, Managing Director at ImpactInstitute, described ESG as no longer a "nice to have," but rather a licence to operate.

Meanwhile, countries such as Poland and the Czech Republic are experiencing signs of ESG fatigue. As Dirk Aarts, CEO of 24/7 Communication, observed in Poland: "...enthusiasm has cooled. Many businesses now treat ESG chiefly as a regulatory requirement rather than a reputational advantage."

In Thailand, ESG is viewed as central to long-term competitiveness, economic resilience, and access to global markets. Whereas in Ukraine, ESG is shaped by wartime realities and EU integration, with social impact and resilience taking precedence.

Despite their differences, one thing stays consistent: stakeholder expectations are converging. The report highlights how companies are increasingly expected to demonstrate real progress and credible outcomes rather than just showing intent.

Global pressures driving change
It was reported that every region, in one way or another, was being impacted by global forces reshaping their ESG communications. Regulatory alignment stood out as a major driver, particularly around mandates by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), and other international disclosure frameworks.

Trade-related mechanisms, such as the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, have resulted in a push for ESG adoption in export-oriented economies like Thailand. Chelsea King, Head of PR Operations and Editorial Director Midas PR, explained: "This creates direct financial pressure and has spurred Thailand’s domestic carbon tax and mandatory reporting efforts."

Political dynamics also play a significant role, with the U.S. becoming the focal point of ESG politicisation, influencing corporate behaviour across multiple markets. This has contributed to more cautious language globally. For example, in Canada, "...U.S. discourse has influenced Canadian corporate leaders to reconsider how explicitly they use the 'ESG' label," said Kimberly Cohen, CEO of Brown & Cohen.

At the same time, global enforcement action against greenwashing is increasing in Canada, as well as other markets such as Australia, Switzerland, and the UK, reinforcing a shift toward proof-based communication.

Language and framing
The report outlined a clear global trend: the declining use of the acronyms "ESG" and "DEI" in public-facing communications. While these terms remain common in investor, regulatory, and technical contexts, organisations are shifting toward simpler and less politicised language, such as "sustainability," "responsible business," "resilience," and "impact."

Kimberly noted that in Canada, these acronyms are increasingly being broken down into their component parts, whereas in Poland, Dirk explained that the narrative now focuses on health, quality of life, and local community impact - moving away from war language, such as "fighting climate change," toward tangible well-being. This shift doesn't reflect a divergence from ESG principles, but rather as an effort to improve clarity, reduce political risk, and connect more directly with local audiences.

Across several regions, including Canada, the UK, the U.S., Thailand, and the Middle East, an increase in social initiatives continues, but under different labels, such as workforce development, inclusion and belonging, human capital management, and community impact.

Communications challenges
Across all regions, communications leaders are reported to have been facing similar challenges, particularly in balancing ambition with credibility. Stakeholders expect companies to act, but are increasingly rejecting vague or exaggerated claims. Greenwashing, social-washing, and "greenhushing" - deliberately under-communicating progress, which is reported to be rising in Australia - are recurring risks.

Another challenge is internal alignment. ESG data and narratives often sit across multiple functions at an organisation, and when teams are not aligned, messaging can become inconsistent or fragmented, resulting in a lack of trust. In sensitive contexts, such as in Ukraine or politically polarised markets like the U.S. and UK, audiences are sceptical and quick to point out inauthenticity.

Looking ahead
Contributors generally predict that over the next two to three years, ESG communications are expected to become more integrated with financial reporting and core business strategy. Many regions anticipate stricter disclosure requirements, greater use of assurance, and increased focus on governance as the foundation for environmental and social credibility.

Media scrutiny is also intensifying. Investigative reporting on ESG claims is growing, while routine sustainability announcements receive less attention unless backed by data or clear outcomes. At the same time, there is continued demand for accessible explanations, case studies, and stories that demonstrate how ESG efforts deliver tangible benefits to communities, employees, and economies.

Practical guidance for communications professionals
Based on insights across all 11 markets, some common practical guidance include:

  • Lead with evidence: Anchor claims in data, defined methodologies, and disclosures, with assurance.
  • Adapt language and be precise: Localise messaging and ensure clear messaging that resonates with target audiences, while avoiding unnecessary jargon.
  • Show progress over time: Share interim milestones and regular updates to demonstrate momentum and avoid greenwashing or greenhushing.
  • Integrate ESG into the business narrative: Position environmental, social, and governance efforts as part of core strategy and operations, rather than a standalone initiative globally.

Find the full report, including in-depth insights for each region, here.

Study
Research

Study Highlight: Cyber risk is stakeholder risk

Penta’s latest white paper, "Cyber risk is stakeholder risk", explores the growing reputational impact of cybersecurity incidents across industries and stakeholder groups. The analysis leverages Penta’s media intelligence and stakeholder sentiment modelling, covering more than 4.8 million global mentions from January 2024 to August 2025.

Key trends shaping the cyber risk landscape
The study finds that overall stakeholder trust is eroding, reflected in strongly negative sentiment around customer privacy, data security, and incident response across all stakeholder groups - particularly regulators and investors.

Cyber risk is also emerging as a geopolitical concern. State-linked attacks are increasingly viewed as potential national security issues, exposing organisations operating in sensitive sectors to heightened geopolitical risk.

At the same time, reputation recovery is no longer just about containment. The research suggests that a brand’s ability to rebound from a cybersecurity incident is closely tied to the effectiveness of its response, with fast and visible executive action outperforming opaque or delayed communications.

Cyber risk breakdown by industries
  • Retail: The most negative sentiment overall, driven by the direct consumer impact of breaches, sensitive customer data, and operational disruption.
  • Technology: The most visible sector in cybersecurity discourse, where recurring attacks and regulatory fallout continue to erode trust in digital infrastructure.
  • Telecommunications: Among the hardest-hit sectors, affected by repeated attacks and legacy breaches resurfacing on the dark web, raising national security concerns.
  • Financial services: Sustained negative sentiment linked to high-profile breaches, customer data exposure, and significant crypto-related losses.
  • Healthcare: Persistent distrust driven by repeated breaches involving patient and billing data, alongside heightened scrutiny of AI-related data risks.
  • Automotive: Negative sentiment following ransomware attacks that disrupted dealer operations and raised concerns about digital resilience in increasingly connected vehicles.
Overall, the study notes that industries with the most direct consumer interfaces tend to experience the steepest reputational declines following cybersecurity incidents.

Key takeaways for communications and public affairs leaders
  • Cyber risk is board-level risk: It must be managed as a cross-functional priority, not solely as a technical or compliance issue.
  • Integrated response drives resilience: Organisations that align IT, legal, communications, and executive leadership with clear escalation protocols and stakeholder-specific strategies are better positioned to protect trust and reputation.
  • Proactive oversight is essential: Scenario planning, continuous monitoring, and treating incidents as reputational challenges enable faster, more effective responses.
  • Leadership visibility matters: Transparent, decisive, and timely action by executives is the most critical factor in stabilising stakeholder confidence and reinforcing organisational credibility.