PR News
<span id="hs_cos_wrapper_name" class="hs_cos_wrapper hs_cos_wrapper_meta_field hs_cos_wrapper_type_text" style="" data-hs-cos-general-type="meta_field" data-hs-cos-type="text" >Telum Talks To: Anna Stark and Tahira Matthews from STARK MATTHEWS</span>

Telum Talks To: Anna Stark and Tahira Matthews from STARK MATTHEWS

Like any other industry, the beauty sector has evolved at a rapid rate over the years and is now valued at approximately $650 billion. As the industry has grown, PR strategies have also transformed, adapting to new trends and challenges.

To explore the evolution of beauty PR, we had a chat with Anna Stark and Tahira Matthews, Co-Founders and Directors of STARK MATTHEWS, who recently celebrated their agency’s 10-year anniversary. Our conversation touched on the shift into digital-first landscape, the involvement of celebrities and influencers, and common misconceptions.


Having been specialists in the beauty PR scene for more than 10 years, how has the industry evolved and what's one thing you don't miss that's been phased out?
When we first started our agency, from a client perspective, it was all about traditional media. While we'd encourage our clients to think digital and social media first, they'd often consider traditional media like print magazines, newspapers, and TV as the ultimate gold standard. Now, it's not just digital and social, engaging and authentic lo-fi brand-owned content is integral to shaping consumer conversations and driving brand love.

From a beauty industry perspective, there are just so many more beauty brands entering the market, and it's never been more saturated. To survive what we call the "Beauty Hunger Games", brands need more than just great products - they need to create an emotional connection with consumers in a way that feels personal and memorable. This need to create two-way connections has driven the rise of consumer activations, taking the brand personality from the screen to the streets, and now playing a key role in overarching PR strategies for many of our clients.

The thing we don't miss? Clients wanting year-long PR strategies. They'd sign off on our big, long strategy at the beginning of the year, and then we just implement the plans throughout the year. Boring! Clients now allow us to be so much more dynamic and responsive to shifting consumer trends and perceptions, resulting in much more impact and a greater ROI.

In today's digital-first landscape, how important are traditional media and physical brand activations in the world of beauty PR?
Brand activations are now more important than ever. When we started our agency 10 years ago, consumer activations were called "experiential" and were few and far between. Now, they play a crucial role.

In an increasingly digital world, people crave real, tangible experiences more than ever. With the sheer volume of beauty brands in the market, creating a real-world, sensory experience is one of the most powerful ways to form an emotional connection with consumers. Whether it's a beautifully curated event, a hands-on masterclass, or a strategic sampling campaign, in-person moments cut through digital noise and leave a lasting impression.

So, for the past few years, in addition to the media and influencer events, we now create so many consumer-driven immersive events, sampling campaigns, and interactive pop-ups. They create moments that spark conversation, build brand love, and turn consumers into true advocates.

While social media and digital content have changed the way consumers discover and engage with brands, traditional media still holds weight, particularly in building credibility and trust. A strong feature in a leading magazine or newspaper can carry a level of authority that’s hard to replicate online.

So, while strategies have absolutely evolved to be more digitally integrated, the most effective beauty PR today is a blend of both - leveraging traditional media for credibility, digital for reach, and physical activations for real-world impact. It's not about choosing one over the other, but about finding the right mix to create meaningful brand engagement.

With consumers demanding more authenticity in PR, do you find that micro and nano influencers offer better engagement and trust compared to celebrity endorsements? Or does star power still hold weight in beauty PR?
Authenticity is everything in PR, and micro and nano influencers have become incredibly powerful in driving engagement and trust. Their audiences tend to be more niche, loyal, and highly engaged, which makes their recommendations feel personal and credible - like hearing from a friend. Consumers are savvy, and they can spot when something feels overly polished or inauthentic, which is why smaller creators often resonate so well.

That said, star power still holds weight - it just depends on how it's used. A big-name influencer or celebrity endorsement alone isn't enough any more; it has to feel organic and aligned with the brand’s values. The most successful beauty partnerships today are the ones with a genuine connection, whether that's someone who has a long-standing love for a product or someone who plays an active role in a brand's storytelling.

Ultimately, it's not about one replacing the other - it's about balance. Micro and nano influencers offer deep engagement and trust, while macro influencers and celebrities can deliver broad awareness and cultural relevance. The real magic happens when a brand leverages both strategically to create impact across different audience touchpoints.

Since influencers and celebrities play a key role in beauty PR nowadays, there's always a risk of controversy. How do you navigate potential backlash when an influencer or ambassador comes under fire, and what steps should brands take to protect themselves from reputational damage?
We always start with our due diligence. We take a strategic, thoughtful approach long before partnering with any influencer or celebrity to ensure there's strong alignment between the influencer’s values and the brand's values from the very beginning. We make it a priority to carefully vet each potential partner - not just looking at their audience size, but understanding their personal values, past behaviour, and how they engage with their followers.

We then set clear expectations from the start, both in terms of the work itself and how the influencer conducts themselves publicly. Contracts include ethical guidelines, and we make sure both sides are on the same page when it comes to public statements or behaviour.

Another key piece of this is monitoring the influencer's activity and overall reputation continuously. That way, if anything does shift or seems off, we can take quick action - whether it's having a conversation with the influencer or adjusting (or worst case, terminating) the partnership early on.

What's a common misconception about working in beauty PR, and what’s the reality that people don’t often see?
Haha - easy - that it's all about glamorous events, mingling with celebs, red carpets, and fancy product launches. And while those moments are fun and exciting, the reality is that most of our work happens behind the scenes.

We always have this conversation with newcomers to the industry. It's a lot of strategy, relationship-building, and constant problem-solving. What people don't always see is the amount of groundwork that goes into making those high-profile moments possible. There's a LOT of attention to detail and behind-the-scenes coordination.

The industry can be fast-paced and ever-changing, which means we're always thinking ahead - anticipating trends, managing crisis situations, and working closely with brands to shape their narratives in a way that feels authentic.

It's a balance of creativity and strategy that takes a lot of dedication and hard work.
Previous story

Perspectives: Time to be brave

Next story

DARKHORSE NZ promotes team member to Business Director

You might also enjoy

Sefiani
Research

Sefiani unveils new research on AI visibility ownership

Strategic communications consultancy, Sefiani, part of Clarity Global, has released a new study indicating that 84 per cent of Australian marketing and comms leaders disagree on who "owns" AI visibility, while the remaining 16 per cent take an integrated approach.

Conducted by OnePoll on behalf of Sefiani, the research surveyed 150 marketing and communications leaders at Director level and above from organisations with more than 50 employees, exploring how strategies have been adapted in response to AI search.

According to the report, 91 per cent of cross-departmental leaders are revising their strategies to influence AI-driven discovery, although an internal "turf war" is emerging over who controls brands' AI search visibility. The research found that ownership currently sits across five functions: data / analytics (23 per cent), comms / corporate affairs (20 per cent), brand (19 per cent), digital (17 per cent), and performance (16 per cent), which the agency said reflects a structurally fragmented approach within many organisations.

The "silo" challenge
To complement its findings, Sefiani collected qualitative insights from leaders through a series of executive GEO-focused sessions and a recent panel moderated by Mandy Galmes, Managing Partner at Sefiani. Speakers included Johanna Lowe, Chief Marketing and Communications Officer at the University of Sydney; Brad Pogson, Head of Communications at Lendi Group; and Tom Telford, Chief Digital Officer at Clarity Global.

Based on these discussions, several themes emerged around managing reputation in AI-driven environments:

  • Internal silos as a key barrier: Participants noted that while some leaders are encouraging cross-functional experimentation, others remain 'nihilistic' about breaking down traditional departmental walls, leading to stalled effort and wasted budgets. The panel identified the rise of AI as a 'shadow task' layered on top of existing senior role requirements without removing previous duties, which further delays progress.
  • The forever life of reputational issues: According to panellists, LLMs draw on long-term patterns across coverage, reviews, forums, and owned content, meaning historic issues may continue resurfacing in AI-generated responses. This suggests that organisations might need to take a more data-led, cross-channel approach to finding, correcting, and rebalancing inaccurate information.
  • Quality content remains critical: Insights from the discussion indicated that AI models do not discriminate by content format, but they do reward depth. The findings suggest that high-quality, thought leadership content performs better within LLM training sets, so it should be considered as central to strategies across channels moving forward.

The cost of siloed GEO: Misinformation and reputational risk
The agency stated that a lack of clear ownership over GEO is already having tangible consequences. Based on the research, AI search was cited by leaders as the most structurally siloed channel, with 77 per cent reporting problems in the last 12 months. This included a slower response to issues, conflicting messages across channels, and AI tools amplifying yesterday's problems instead of today's narratives.

The study also found that the risk is compounded by the speed at which AI-generated misinformation can spread, with 25 per cent of leaders reporting that incorrect, inconsistent, or outdated brand information has already appeared in AI answers.

"Reputation used to be managed channel by channel, but AI search has changed the rules. Because these systems read across everything - earned coverage, on-site content, social signals, and search authority - siloed marketing and communications are quietly muting your AI visibility," said Tom Telford.

"When your channels don't tell the same story, or teams are chasing independent KPIs with separate budget pots, these silos also become a major reputational liability. It is only when functions are truly connected that the models become trained on a consistent brand message and compound visibility across AI services over time. This is the crux of GEO, Generative Engine Optimisation, and done well it becomes the multiplier on everything you already invest in brand, PR and digital."

The "citations race": PR and earned media take centre stage
The report also suggested that a shift toward AI-first discovery is changing budget priorities.

According to the findings, 49 per cent of leaders have already allocated five to 10 per cent of their marketing and communications budgets to AI visibility, with 90 per cent of that spend being reallocated from traditional channels like paid digital and brand. A further 30 per cent reported allocating up to 20 per cent of their budgets.

Citing external analysis from Gartner, the agency noted that the majority of sources referenced by AI systems are non-paid, which the report argues increases the strategic importance of PR and earned media in AI-driven discovery.

Mandy Galmes said: "When LLMs answer a question in your category, they’re drawing overwhelmingly on non-paid, third party sources. If your spokespeople, experts, case studies and proof points aren’t in those sources, you’re invisible at a key moment in the buyer journey." 

Francesca
Moves

Francesca Talevski moves into education sector with senior comms role

Francesca Talevski has been welcomed at Keypath Education as Senior Manager, Communications & Brand. She has wrapped up close to a decade at Vanguard Australia, most recently as Senior Public Relations Specialist.  

Rhiannon
Moves

Rhiannon Hughes takes up Vivid Sydney contract

Rhiannon Hughes has started as PR Manager for Vivid Sydney at Destination NSW. She was previously at TEAM LEWIS as Campaign Director.

Rhiannon also holds experience at Employsure, Sling & Stone AU / NZ, and Porter Novelli New Zealand.