PR News
Susanne Martin

The PR and communications sector in Aotearoa today: Finding its next gear

There is a tendency to judge the health of our communications profession by the number of job advertisements, agency mergers, or restructuring announcements. While these indicators provide part of the picture, they rarely tell the full story.

Conversations with senior practitioners from across Aotearoa New Zealand paint a more nuanced view of the sector in 2026. Following several years characterised by economic uncertainty, political change, organisational restructures, and cautious investment, confidence is beginning to return. Yet it is not a simple return to business as usual. The profession itself is evolving.

One of the clearest signs of that evolution is the growing investment in professional capability. Across the profession, communications practitioners are actively developing new skills to navigate artificial intelligence, changing stakeholder expectations, and their strategic role within their organisations.

Communications leaders are finding themselves at the centre of more complex organisational decisions. Artificial intelligence is reshaping workflows and changing how stakeholders think about visibility. Trust has become one of the most valuable strategic assets an organisation can possess. At the same time, communications professionals are being asked to deliver more value than ever before with finite resources.

What we're seeing is a profession entering a new phase, where strategic judgement and trusted advice are becoming even more important.

Recruitment confidence returns

Perhaps the clearest sign of improving confidence is the recruitment market.

After an extended period where organisations delayed hiring and relied heavily on internal resources, recruiters are now reporting renewed activity across both permanent and contract roles. In Wellington particularly, contracting has strengthened as organisations seek experienced professionals who can quickly fill capability gaps created through restructures, hiring freezes, and staff turnover.

Many communications teams remain deliberately lean, creating strong demand for
practitioners capable of stepping into complex environments and making an immediate
impact.

Permanent recruitment is also showing encouraging signs. Demand is strongest for
experienced communications and engagement professionals with around five to eight
years' experience, particularly those capable of combining strategic thinking with practical delivery.

Interestingly, recruitment activity is also being influenced by broader workforce trends.
Auckland employers continue to experience shortages in this mid-career cohort as many
professionals pursue overseas opportunities or relocate to Australia, creating additional
competition for experienced talent.

Salary expectations also appear to be normalising. While some organisations initially
assumed a softer employment market would place downward pressure on remuneration,
that perception has largely disappeared. Rates have largely returned to levels seen in
2022/23, reflecting continuing demand for experienced practitioners.

While uncertainty inevitably remains, particularly as organisations prepare for another
election cycle, the overall mood among recruiters is notably more optimistic than it has
been in recent years.

A changing agency landscape

Agency leaders report a similarly mixed but generally positive outlook.

Some agencies continue to experience steady growth, supported by expanding work from existing clients rather than relying solely on winning new business. This reflects the
enduring value clients place on trusted advisory relationships, particularly during periods
of uncertainty.

At the same time, client behaviour is changing.

Many organisations remain financially cautious. Rather than aggressively pursuing
expansion, communications investment is increasingly focused on protecting reputation,
maintaining stakeholder confidence, and defending market position. This shift has changed the nature of advisory work, with agencies spending more time supporting clients through complex issues, regulatory change, and strategic risk management.

For others, particularly some regional agencies, conditions have remained remarkably
stable. While they have not necessarily experienced significant growth or contraction, they describe a consistent flow of work and continued demand for senior strategic expertise.

One notable trend emerging across agencies is the changing nature of client requests.

Routine communications tasks that once consumed significant time are gradually
diminishing. Rather than reducing demand for communications expertise, this appears to
be shifting agency work further up the value chain.

Clients are seeking advice on complex stakeholder engagement, strategic
communications, government relations, regulatory environments, and issues management. In other words, organisations are less focused on simply producing communications and more focused on determining what should be communicated, when, and why.

As technology automates more routine production, human judgement becomes
progressively more valuable.

Public sector and Wellington: the calm before the next storm?

The picture in Wellington's public sector is somewhat more complicated.

After successive rounds of restructuring and organisational change, there is a palpable
sense of fatigue among public sector practitioners. Many have been through restructure
after restructure, and the current period feels less like a return to normal than a temporary pause.

There is also a familiar Wellington rhythm at this point in the political cycle. With an
election ahead, some plans are being placed on hold because they may ultimately require
decisions from the next government. Major change has slowed, creating something of a
holding pattern.

For communications professionals, however, that pause does not necessarily mean a
reduction in demand. If anything, it may simply be the calm before another period of
significant change.

That is likely to create increasing demand for practitioners who can lead change
communications: people who can help organisations communicate difficult decisions
clearly, engage already-fatigued workforces, manage uncertainty, and maintain trust while
change is implemented.

There is also a more positive counterpoint to the discussion around the cost of
communications contractors. Following the reductions across the public sector, there has
been less commentary about the perceived expense of contractors. Yet experienced
communications specialists remain highly valued because they can bring immediate
capability into lean teams and complex environments. The best practitioners remain worth their weight in gold.

Communications moves upstream

One of the strongest themes emerging across every sector is the growing strategic
influence of communications.

Communications professionals are being included earlier in organisational decision-making, moving beyond implementation to become genuine advisers around
organisational strategy.

Organisations are navigating inflationary pressures, workforce shortages, heightened
public scrutiny, political uncertainty, misinformation, regulatory complexity, and rapidly
changing technology. These challenges cannot simply be explained through
communications once decisions have already been made.

Instead, communications professionals are helping shape better decisions from the outset.

The most effective organisations are steadily recognising that communications is not
simply about producing content or managing channels. It is about understanding
stakeholder expectations, assessing reputational risk, building trust, and ensuring
decisions can withstand public scrutiny.

Investing in capability, not just capacity

If there is one tangible indicator that the profession is embracing change rather than
resisting it, it is the growing appetite for professional development.

At PRINZ, participation in continuing professional development (CPD) has increased by 16
per cent year on year, despite the economic pressures many organisations continue to
navigate. That level of growth suggests communications practitioners recognise that
standing still is simply not an option in a profession evolving as rapidly as ours.

Importantly, the demand is not simply for theory. While there is significant interest in
understanding emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, practitioners are more often seeking practical tools, frameworks, and real-world applications that can be
immediately translated into their workplaces.

The focus has shifted from learning about change to building the confidence and capability to lead it.

This trend reflects a broader shift across the profession. Organisations seem to now
recognise that communications capability is about equipping professionals with the skills
to provide strategic counsel and build trusted relationships in rapidly changing
environments.

As organisations focus their professional development budgets on building capability,
PRINZ has also adapted its approach to learning. Course fees for non-members now
include a 12-month PRINZ membership, allowing participants to gain immediate practical
skills while also becoming part of the wider profession and accessing all the benefits of PRINZ membership.

It is a practical response to the way many organisations now allocate professional
development funding, ensuring investment in learning also provides an enduring
connection to the profession. Participants leave not only with new skills they can
immediately apply, but with continued access to the insights and professional standards
that help communications practitioners grow throughout their careers.

The increasing demand for professional development sends an encouraging signal. New
Zealand’s communications professionals are not standing still. They are actively investing
in the skills, judgement, and networks that will enable them to lead organisations
confidently through the next phase of the profession’s evolution.

 

Artificial intelligence changes the conversation

No discussion about the communications profession in 2026 would be complete without
acknowledging the growing influence of artificial intelligence.

Interestingly, practitioners are not primarily discussing AI as a threat to jobs. Many
organisations are actively investing in training their communications teams to better
understand AI tools while simultaneously strengthening the strategic skills that technology cannot replace.

The emergence of Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO) is changing how organisations
think about reputation and discoverability.

Rather than focusing exclusively on traditional search engine optimisation, there is
recognition that appearing in AI-generated responses requires a consistent body of
credible, authoritative content. This has renewed interest in proactive public relations,
thought leadership, and reputation-building activities that establish organisations as
trusted sources of information.

As media channels have fragmented, earned media and high-quality editorial coverage
remain important signals of authority, creating fresh opportunities for public relations
professionals to demonstrate measurable value.

AI appears to be reinforcing the importance of trusted content and credible relationships
rather than diminishing them.

Trust becomes the competitive advantage

If one word captures the future direction of the profession, it is trust.

Credibility has become the true differentiator.

Across sectors, practitioners report growing emphasis on authentic leadership, employee
advocacy, meaningful stakeholder engagement, community relationships, and long-term
reputation building.

Rather than chasing short-term reach or engagement metrics, successful organisations
are investing in relationships that create lasting confidence among employees, customers, regulators, communities, and other stakeholders.

This is particularly evident in sectors where public confidence directly influences
organisational success, including health, professional services, and government-related
industries.

Communications therefore becomes less about broadcasting messages and more about
building relationships capable of sustaining trust over time.

Ethics matters more, not less

The increasing complexity of the communications environment also reinforces the
importance of professional standards.

For PRINZ members, membership carries an important commitment: adherence to the
PRINZ Code of Ethics. In an environment where the speed and scale of content creation
are increasing exponentially, professional judgement and ethical decision-making have
never been more important.

The Code provides a foundation for practitioners navigating questions of accuracy,
transparency, integrity, conflicts of interest, and responsibility to audiences and
stakeholders. These principles matter whether a communication is drafted by a person,
assisted by AI, or produced almost entirely through technology.

PRINZ is currently reviewing its Code of Ethics to ensure it continues to reflect the realities of contemporary communications practice and the new normal in which practitioners are operating.

This review is important because professional standards cannot remain static while the
environment around them changes. The tools may be new but the responsibility remains.

Relationships remain central

One encouraging observation emerging from agency practitioners is the continuing
strength of relationships between experienced communicators and journalists.

While the New Zealand media landscape continues to transform, many senior practitioners describe constructive engagement built on mutual respect and a shared
commitment to quality storytelling.

This reinforces a truth sometimes overlooked: communications remains fundamentally
about people.

Technology can assist with drafting content, analysing data, and automating processes, but trust, judgement, empathy, and relationships remain distinctly human capabilities.

Looking ahead

What comes through from all of this feedback is a profession that is confidently evolving.

Trust has become an organisational imperative rather than simply a communications
objective, and professional standards are becoming more important as the velocity and
complexity of communications continue to increase.

Perhaps most importantly, the profession appears to be moving beyond debates about
whether communications deserves a strategic seat at the table.

Organisations appear to understand more than ever that reputation and stakeholder
confidence are critical to their success. Communications professionals are uniquely
positioned to help leaders navigate these challenges.

As one of our senior members commented, "The future will not be defined simply by how
quickly we adopt the latest technology, but by how effectively we combine technological
capability with uniquely human qualities: judgement, ethics, empathy, curiosity,
relationship building, and strategic thinking”.

Those capabilities have always been at the heart of good communications.

In an increasingly automated world, they may become even more valuable.

This Earned View column was contributed by Susanne Martin, Chief Executive of the Public Relations Institute of New Zealand (PRINZ), with insights from PRINZ members. PRINZ is the professional body representing public relations and communications practitioners across Aotearoa.

Susanne has a career spanning commercial business, vocational education, and professional membership organisations in New Zealand and Australia, with senior leadership experience across strategy, business development, operations, stakeholder engagement, and sales growth. This breadth gives her a perspective that extends beyond the PR profession itself, including the commercial and organisational imperatives shaping the way organisations operate.

Since joining PRINZ in 2022, Susanne has led the Institute through a period of significant change, with a focus on strengthening its strategic direction, financial sustainability, member value, professional development, partnerships, and advocacy for the profession. She is passionate about the role of PR and communications in building trust and helping organisations navigate an increasingly complex environment.

Through her role at PRINZ, Susanne works closely with practitioners, agencies, organisations and industry stakeholders across Aotearoa and has a strong view on where the profession is heading and the challenges it faces.

More likely to call a spade a shovel, Susanne brings a commercially minded and straight-talking perspective to the sector.

Read more from our columnists in The Earned View

Previous story

SenateSHJ: Despite a growing divide, Australians still come together when it counts

Next story

Tracy Bustamante commences new chapter in tech sector

You might also enjoy

Event
Events

Event wrap-up: Telum Talks to The Sun Malaysia

On 14th October 2026, Telum Media hosted an exclusive in-person discussion in Kuala Lumpur featuring Himanshu Bhatt, Acting Managing Editor of The Sun Malaysia. The session was also joined by Irene Tan, the publication's General Manager of Advertising and Marketing.

Moderated by Mary-Jane Tan from Telum Media, the discussion explored The Sun Malaysia’s core audience across its print and digital platforms, alongside its editorial priorities and the evolving trends shaping news consumption. More than 100 PR and communications professionals in attendance also gained insights into identifying stories that resonate with everyday readers.

01 cropped

During the session, Irene urged communicators to move beyond hard-sell approaches by offering relevant knowledge, timely insights and valuable information that reflect current trends and wider public interests.

The discussion also covered how communicators can develop compelling story angles to improve their chances of securing mainstream media coverage. Tips included demonstrating a direct impact on consumers, addressing wider industry issues and offering solutions to societal challenges.

02 cropped

In the audience Q&A segment, communicators representing different sectors shared their respective concerns and sought editorial suggestions. The segment also addressed questions about pitching and the current media landscape.

Stay tuned for more Telum Media events by subscribing to our News Alerts for the latest updates.

Umesh
Moves

Umesh Ratnagobal joins construction company as Head of Corporate Affairs

Umesh Ratnagobal has joined Australian construction company, Kapitol, as Head of Corporate Affairs. He was previously at Laing O'Rourke as Head of Government and Client Relations. Prior to this, Umesh held comms roles within the government, tech, and oil and gas sectors.

Sefiani: Cyber
Research

Sefiani: Cyber incident playbook needs a rewrite for the AI era

Historical data breaches are resurfacing in AI-generated answers when consumers evaluate whether to trust or purchase from an organisation, potentially extending their reputational impact long after the incidents have been resolved, according to a new report by Sefiani, part of Clarity Global.

The research, Cyber Breaches and Reputation Response in the AI Era, combined a nationally representative YouGov survey of 1,019 Australian adults, conducted between 19 and 24 August 2026, with an analysis of how three AI search tools reference historical cyber incidents across different stages of the customer journey.

Using its Surfacd AI visibility tool, Sefiani examined three organisations that had experienced significant data breaches: a global law firm, a global logistics company, and an Australian private health insurer. The analysis tested 30 prompts per organisation across ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, and Google AI Overviews.

The findings suggest that while consumers may be willing to remain with organisations following a data breach, the way a company communicates its response and subsequent improvements can have lasting reputational implications.

Breach visibility increases closer to purchase decisions

The study found that historical data breaches were rarely mentioned in AI-generated responses during the initial stages of customer research but became increasingly visible as queries shifted towards evaluating specific organisations.

During the category discovery stage, past breaches appeared in an average of 2.7 per cent of AI responses across the three organisations. This increased to 13.1 per cent during brand validation and 42.2 per cent at the decision stage, when users asked more directly about an organisation's trustworthiness.

For one organisation, breach history appeared in 59.1 per cent of decision-stage responses.

The research also found that AI responses did not exclusively frame historical breaches negatively. Some answers referenced how organisations restored services, improved security, or responded to incidents.

According to Sefiani, this means organisations need to consider how their handling of an incident continues to be represented publicly, even after the immediate crisis has been resolved.

Customer loyalty depends on the response

The YouGov survey found that 31 per cent of Australian respondents said they would stop using an organisation following a data breach, while 53 per cent said they might stop.

However, the research identified a gap between stated intentions and reported behaviour, suggesting that experiencing a data breach does not necessarily result in customers abandoning an organisation.

Among all respondents, 57 per cent had been customers of an organisation that experienced a breach. The report found that 13 per cent had moved to another provider, while 24 per cent considered leaving but stayed, and 20 per cent did not consider leaving.

When asked what would influence their decision to continue using a company following a breach, respondents identified measures taken to prevent another incident as the most important factor (39 per cent). This was followed by the seriousness of the breach (32 per cent), the type of customer information affected (32 per cent), transparent communications about what happened (30 per cent), and support offered to affected customers (29 per cent).

The study also tested how descriptions of an organisation's breach response in AI-generated answers could influence purchasing intentions.

When respondents were presented with a scenario in which AI reported that an organisation had been slow to notify customers and lacked transparency, 28 per cent said they would purchase from it. This increased to 57 per cent when the AI response described prompt customer notification, clear explanations, and practical support.

By comparison, 67 per cent said they would purchase from an organisation that was generally well reviewed, with no data breaches mentioned.

 

Where AI draws its information from

Sefiani also examined the information sources referenced by AI when generating answers about the three organisations.

Corporate content, including company websites and owned reports, appeared most frequently, referenced in 88 per cent of responses. Editorial media coverage followed at 61 per cent, while government and regulatory sources appeared in 55 per cent, and user-generated content, including social media, in 36 per cent.

The report noted that the source mix varied depending on the sector and the nature of the query.

These findings highlight the role of both owned communications and independent third-party information in shaping how AI presents an organisation's reputation.

According to Sefiani, organisations that stop communicating publicly once a breach has been resolved risk leaving AI tools to draw on historical media reports and other third-party commentary without access to an updated account of the company's response.

Sefiani's Managing Partner, Mandy Galmes, said organisations should consider what information remains publicly available after the immediate incident has passed.

"Once the incident is resolved, organisations need to publish a clear, factual account of what happened, what they did and, importantly, what they have changed, on their own channels. This means AI has your own version of the incident. If this step is missed, AI will build the story and define your reputation for you, from whatever media coverage or third party commentary appeared."

Updating the crisis communications playbook

The report argued that established cyber crisis communications practices, including timely disclosure, factual updates, and customer support, remain important but need to account for how AI tools retrieve information long after an incident.

It proposed five additional considerations for organisations managing cyber incidents:

  • Publish a factual account of the incident and response: Maintain an accessible summary on owned channels outlining what happened, how customers were supported and what has changed to reduce the risk of recurrence.

  • Engage with credible editorial media: Consider providing journalists with a factual account of the organisation's response, remediation and lessons learned to create an independent record.

  • Maintain customer support beyond the immediate incident: Recognise that customer experiences may continue to influence reviews, social media discussions and other content used by AI.

  • Share lessons with industry stakeholders: Work with industry bodies and peers to communicate relevant learnings that could support broader cyber preparedness.

  • Monitor AI-generated responses over time: Assess how AI platforms describe the organisation before and after an incident, including which sources and narratives they reference.

Co-founder and CEO of NSB Cyber, Shane Bell, highlighted the importance of communications during the initial response.

"Good and bad cyber incidents used to come down purely to technical judgement. A bad incident is now more often than not one that was poorly communicated. Technology discussions tend to dominate the first 72 hours, when communications should be front and centre. Organisations that struggle are the ones least prepared to talk to the regulators, suppliers, partners and customers," he said.

What communications professionals need to know

The research suggests that the reputational consequences of cyber incidents may extend beyond the traditional news cycle, particularly as AI tools increasingly draw on historical information when responding to questions about organisational trustworthiness.

For PR and communications professionals, the findings point to the importance of maintaining an accurate, accessible record of an organisation's response and remediation, alongside continued engagement with customers and relevant stakeholders.

For media professionals, the study highlights the potential longer-term role of editorial coverage as a source of information in AI-generated assessments of organisations.

The findings also suggest that post-crisis communications should not be measured solely by the immediate public response. Monitoring how past incidents and subsequent corrective actions are represented across AI platforms may become another consideration in long-term reputation management.