PR News
<span id="hs_cos_wrapper_name" class="hs_cos_wrapper hs_cos_wrapper_meta_field hs_cos_wrapper_type_text" style="" data-hs-cos-general-type="meta_field" data-hs-cos-type="text" >Study Highlight: The 2025 Edelman Trust Barometer for Asia Pacific</span>

Study Highlight: The 2025 Edelman Trust Barometer for Asia Pacific

The 2025 Edelman Trust Barometer for Asia Pacific has been released, marking the 25 th edition of the report. This year focusses on trust and optimism amidst the crisis of grievance.

Regional responses featured Australia, Mainland China, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, and India.

Overall, the Barometer highlighted a sense of grievance towards government, business, and the rich. Globally, 61 per cent have a moderate or high sense of grievance, marked by a belief that the system unjustly favours the rich and that the government and business serve narrow interests.

The report suggests that this grievance can erode trust. Respondents with a high sense of grievance distrust any of the four institutions (business, government, media, and NGOs), business leaders, nor artificial intelligence.

The bottom income quartile also had a lower Trust Index (trust in the four institutions). In APAC, low-income respondents have had consistently lower trust than their high-income counterparts since 2012. In 2025, low-income respondents averaged 55 per cent trust as compared to the 67 per cent of their high-income counterparts. The greatest income-based trust inequality was observed in Thailand (24-point difference) and Indonesia (17 points) - the global discrepancy is at 12 points.

Business remained the most trusted institution, especially in APAC. Media is the least trusted, with a lowered trust in all sources for general news and information - search engines, traditional media, owned media, and social media.

But for business, this higher trust combined with widespread grievance puts pressure on this sector to do more to provide good job opportunities and retraining, as well as address climate change, affordability, misinformation, and discrimination.

Respondents, especially in APAC, also believe that CEOs can address societal issues if they could have a major impact or improve business performance, as well as if their business contributed to the problem or the issue harms their stakeholders.

Yet, the Trust Barometer concludes that this responsibility is shared across the board - all institutions work to build trust and rebuild optimism to address grievances. When trust increases, optimism can overpower grievances.

Key regional findings
  • Compared to the 56 per cent globally, the APAC Trust Index averaged 61 per cent.
    • Six of the 10 most trusting markets globally are APAC-based, with Mainland China (77 per cent), Indonesia (76), and India (75) at the top.
    • Japan (37) and South Korea (41) ranked last globally.
  • Business remained the most trusted institution (65 per cent) in APAC, with Mainland China and India at 81 per cent each, followed by Indonesia (80 per cent).
    • Overall, APAC markets showed trust in business, aside from Japan (48) and South Korea (43), which saw the lowest trust levels globally.
  • APAC recorded a 62 per cent trust in government, compared to 52 per cent globally.
    • APAC also constituted six of the eight most trusted markets, with Mainland China ranked first at 83 per cent, followed by India (79), Singapore (77), Indonesia (75), Malaysia (67) and Thailand (63).
    • Conversely, at 32 per cent, Japan ranked last globally in terms of trust in the government.
  • Trust in media is marked at 57 per cent (compared to 52 per cent globally).
    • Globally, Mainland China and Indonesia tied for the highest trust level at 75 per cent, with the latter seeing a significant gain of five per cent of trust from 2024. Thailand and India followed suit at 67 per cent each.
    • South Korea (38), Australia (37) and Japan (33) placed amongst the bottom four globally.
Key institutions and organisations
  • Employers remained trusted in 27 of 28 markets despite the three-point decline in global average at 75 per cent.
    • Indonesia (93), India (89), China (84) and Thailand (83) ranked highest.
    • At a 48 per cent trust level, only South Koreans showed distrust in their employers.
  • In line with global averages, 65 per cent of APAC respondents believe that news organisations would rather attract a big audience than tell people what they need to know, while 59 per cent think the media favours supporting an ideology over objective reporting.
  • The United Nations is trusted in 10 of 28 markets measured, with a 58 per cent trust level.
    • Five of the top 10 markets are in APAC, with Thailand (79 per cent), Mainland China (78) and India (78) placing in the top three, and Indonesia (72) and Singapore (60) following suit.
    • At 39 per cent, Japanese respondents marked the lowest trust in the UN.
Fears and grievances
  • APAC employees showed higher levels of worry over job security being threatened by globalisation, economic pressures and technology.
    • Regionally, Malaysian employees showed the highest degree of worry over international trade conflicts, foreign competitors, offshoring, looming recession and automation.
  • In line with global averages, 67 per cent of APAC respondents are convinced that the wealthy don’t pay their fair share of taxes, and that the wealthy’s selfishness is the cause of many problems.
  • 46 per cent of regional respondents see hostile activism, which includes attacking people online, intentionally spreading disinformation, and damage to public or private property, as a viable means of driving change.
    • 55 per cent of those aged 18-34 approve of hostile activism.
  • 36 per cent of global respondents believe that the next generation will be better off compared to today.
    • In most developed markets, less than 1 in 5 are optimistic. Regionally, Japan and Australia saw the lowest trust, at 14 and 17 per cent respectively.
    • Mainland China (69), India (66), and Indonesia (65) were amongst the top four most optimistic markets globally.  
  • The fear of experiencing prejudice, discrimination or racism has risen to an all-time high at 63 per cent globally, which is a ten-point increase from 2024.
    • Amongst the 28 markets, Malaysia (78) and Indonesia (77) have the highest fear.
    • 15 markets saw a double-digit jump, with Indonesia seeing a 23-point increase.
Read the full report here.
 
Previous story

Progressive Communications joins forces with Active for regional collaboration

Next story

Perspectives: Empowering women leaders: Balance, networks and support for success

You might also enjoy

Blueshark
Moves

Blueshark promotes communications head

Eric Lim has been elevated to Head of Marketing Strategy & Communications at Blueshark, a partner of PETRONAS Group in green mobility. Based in Malaysia, he spearheads brand communications, public relations, content creation, collaborations, and marketing for the electromobility company and its sub-brand, SoloEra.

Eric has accumulated more than 25 years of communications, marketing, and related experience across the automotive, technology, and property development sectors, and was most recently Senior Manager of Brand and Communications at Blueshark.

TikTok
Moves

TikTok welcomes new regional comms leader

Anggini Setiawan has stepped into the role of Head of Communications for Southeast Asia at TikTok. Based in Jakarta, she oversees the social media brand's overall communications activities and reputation across the region.

Anggini brings more than a decade of comms experience across agency and in-house roles at Beyond Communication, Ruangguru, and ByteDance.

AI’s
Feature

AI’s integration into PR and comms in 2025

Over the past few years, mentions of AI within the industry haven't toned down - if anything, they've been ramping up. Looking back at Telum's 2024 Year Ahead and PR Tech in 2025 pieces, it's interesting to see how attitudes have shifted. What began as a period of experimentation - playing with prompts, dabbling in ideation, and speculating about job replacement - has solidified into a structural transformation within the profession.

AI has moved from a nice-to-have to a non-negotiable; from a fringe tool to a core strategic capability. 2025 is the year PR and comms practitioners stopped asking, “What can AI do?” and began asking, "How do we lead with it?”.

Integration of AI tools in the industry
Early adoption of AI centred around basic prompting and inspiration. In 2025, however, practitioners in the PR and comms space have unlocked more of its capabilities.

We saw many organisations develop their own AI offerings across APAC and the Middle East, ranging from AI visibility services and training tools to crisis solutions. These include PIABO GEO, Ogilvy ANZ’s Generative Impact, Golin’s First Answer, TEAM LEWIS' Training for Trust, and FINN Partners' CANARY FOR CRISIS.

The narrative around job replacement has also softened. Rather than replacing humans, the industry is now embracing AI as an enhancer.

As Natacha Clarac, Director General of Athenora Consulting in Brussels and former President of PRGN, said following PRGN's launch of Précis Public Relations: "The introduction of Précis Public Relations showcases the potential of AI to enhance rather than replace the strategic value PR professionals offer."

GEO / LEO and search transformation
One trend that we have seen in 2025 was the decline of traditional search behaviour. AI assistants, such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity, increasingly replaced clicks with instant answers.

As Nichole Provatas, Executive Vice President and APAC Head of Integrated Marketing and Innovation at WE Communications, noted: "Around 69 per cent of Google news searches now end in zero clicks as AI Overviews rise."

This reality raises the stakes for inclusion in AI answers, as Rob van Alphen, Managing Director of Polaris Digital, warned: “…if your brand or leadership isn’t part of the AI answer, you’re invisible.”

Jack Barbour, EVP and AI Lead at Golin New York, and Nichole both highlighted how earned media is key in making brands discoverable, with at least 90 per cent of AI search results coming from earned citations. Brian Buchwald, Edelman’s President, Global Transformation and Performance, emphasised the same point: "You can't buy your way to the top of an AI-generated answer...brands must proactively shape how they appear in LLM outputs or risk being misrepresented, misunderstood, or missed entirely."

AI platforms are relying on reputable journalism, corporate blogs, and expert commentaries - flipping the paid-dominated marketing playbook on its head.

This shift fuelled the rise of GEO (Generative Engine Optimisation) and LEO (Language Engine Optimisation). In April, Celia Harding launched what she described as the world’s first LEO advisory firm, arguing: "While other agencies are looking at how AI can drive efficiencies in creativity and client service, they are all overlooking the real opportunity that lies ahead - shaping the data LLMs learn from."

If SEO defined the 2010s, GEO and LEO are shaping 2025 and beyond, with earned media at the core.

AI upskilling
As AI adoption surged throughout the year, professional development opportunities expanded rapidly, ranging from hands-on workshops and panel discussions to large-scale conferences.

These events spanned the region, including the Generative AI Bootcamp series by PRCA APAC and Sequencr AI, PRCA Thailand's first-ever conference in Bangkok on AI and communications, and Jakarta's “Shape the Future of Your Communications Strategy with AI” workshop hosted by ACE, APPRI and Reputasia Strategic Communications.

Telum Media also hosted its own list of AI-focused events, including workshops with Shaun Davies in Sydney and Melbourne, a workshop with Rob Van Alphen in Singapore, a global webinar with Matt Collette, collaborations with the Kennedy Foundation for panels on AI and journalism in Australia, and joint sessions with SOPA on ethical AI use in publishing in Singapore and Hong Kong.

The scale of these events showed one thing - these sessions were no longer “optional extras”, they've become essential for teams wanting to keep pace with AI's evolution across the industry.

Human and ethical considerations
As AI adoption rose, so did the reminders that human oversight remains essential. Practitioners repeatedly stressed that AI cannot replace human judgement, empathy, or lived experience.

As Matt Cram, Head of Media and Communications at Orygen, put it: "AI can’t replace the way people connect through empathy, creativity, and lived experiences."

Rob van Alphen reinforced this: "…we must double down on our inherently human strengths, such as empathy, curiosity, ethical decision-making, and critical thinking."

And Zeno’s Head of Regional Business Development, Asia, Ekta Thomas, said: "People connect with people - not algorithms."

These sentiments were reinforced across industry events focused on responsible AI use. At the Jakarta workshop, Reputasia Co-Founder and Communications Strategist, Fardila Astari, emphasised the importance of ethical guidelines for AI use, noting that careless application can create reputational risks, as seen in cases where major companies faced credibility issues due to AI-generated inaccuracies.

Similar points were made at Telum Media and SOPA's sessions in Singapore and Hong Kong, where newsroom leaders stressed the importance of maintaining editorial oversight, transparent disclosure, and strong governance structures. The consensus is that while AI may accelerate workflows, humans safeguard credibility.

2026 and beyond
As we approach the new year, AI is shifting from experimental to foundational. Nichole Provatas urges teams to "publish for AI inclusion," treating owned channels as structured, plain-language reference hubs built for machine ingestion.

But the landscape is still evolving, as Matt Cram cautions: "AI doesn’t just surface information, it consumes it…and the best strategies today might look very different tomorrow." For communicators, adaptability becomes the differentiator.

Ultimately, the future isn't AI-led but AI-enabled. As Matt Collette notes, "Human + AI is the new paradigm." Success will come from pairing AI's scale and precision with the empathy, judgement, and contextual understanding only humans can bring.