PR News
<span id="hs_cos_wrapper_name" class="hs_cos_wrapper hs_cos_wrapper_meta_field hs_cos_wrapper_type_text" style="" data-hs-cos-general-type="meta_field" data-hs-cos-type="text" >Telum Talks To: Jen Sharpe, Founder & Managing Director of Think HQ</span>

Telum Talks To: Jen Sharpe, Founder & Managing Director of Think HQ

A company's values are like an anchor - they remind the founders why they started and what they believe in. But as the years pass, those anchors can be tested - companies can end up changing not just their values, but also the way they work and the culture that underpins them.

To explore what it takes to hold on to values while growing, Telum spoke to Jen Sharpe, Founder and Managing Director of Think HQ. Having just marked their 15th anniversary, Jen shares her insights on expanding into different markets, preventing company culture from being diluted, and navigating growth without losing purpose.

Your Sydney expansion has been swift, and you’ve hinted at further future acquisitions and a bigger geographical footprint. If you were to expand globally, how would you adapt Think HQ's inclusive and values-led model to markets that may be more conservative or culturally different?
We're succeeding as an inclusive agency in the mainstream for two reasons:

  • Our staff composition reflects the community we operate in.
  • We have a good number of 'macro-thinkers' who are not just attuned to the comms industry, but to the broader system we are operating in, including government regulation, the social, and commercial environment.

We're not just coming at it from comms - we've got a broader lens. We've got our finger on the cultural pulse, not just what’s happening in our industry.

The success of any expansion would be led by replicating those two things. Recruiting to reflect the new community we are operating in, and having the in-house knowledge and experience to understand the local context.

Our approach to our new client, Philippine Airlines, is a simple example of how we make that work. We have Philippine-born Australian staff, so we're easily able to mix between the two markets.

Even how we operate in Melbourne and Sydney will be a little different because of the different contexts - they often feel like two different countries.

Wherever you operate, your people are your business. If you lose sight of the people and you're just looking at numbers, you're going to lose the essence of the business.

Growth can sometimes pivot a company from its original culture - especially one built on values. As you expand, particularly into new geographies, how do you ensure Think HQ's purpose-led philosophy doesn't get diluted? And were there certain things you had to compromise in terms of values against growth?
Our acquisition of Sydney-based LOUD in 2024 certainly tested our boundaries. Until then, we had traditionally worked in what could fairly be described as a 'safer' space in government and statutory bodies.

LOUD was a cultural fit with complementary expertise, including multicultural engagement, but for corporate clients. So now we're increasingly working with corporates.

But over the 15 years that I've been operating the business, I've realised the world isn't perfect in any sector - government, corporate or any other.

The way we retain our value base as we grow is by going through what we call a responsible business assessment for our projects. It's a process that runs us through a series of questions from a values perspective. This helps us understand the motivations of the business or the organisation we’d be working with, what the impact will be, and ultimately if it's positive. Then we make a decision.

In reality, there are lots of grey areas. The world isn’t cut and dried, so we can’t be either. But at least we're holding ourselves accountable to that discussion.

In a 2021 interview with Telum, you spoke about plans for Think HQ being a 'blueprint for agencies in the future'. With the rise of DEI, ESG and values-based hiring, it feels like the industry has started catching up. What's the next step for Think HQ and for agencies who want to lead with purpose, rather than just following the trend?
In terms of catching up, while agencies might look like they have progressed, the recent merger between two major global media groups shows us a different reality - it is a giant and dangerous precedent-setting leap backwards.

A 'Trump-like' clause in the agreement strips moral agency from one of the biggest global agency groups in the world by removing any right to reject a client or a media platform based on ideology, which is deeply concerning for those of us committed to ethical communications.

For Think HQ, we can't (and absolutely would not want to) step away from being values-led or a commitment to DEI because our entire business model depends on our inclusion and diversity.

The challenge for purpose-driven agencies today is ensuring they have a sustainable business that can persevere as the market shifts. Values can't sit on the side as a 'nice to have', it should be embedded in everything you do.

Breaking out of the traditional model - that narrow view of who agencies are and what they do - has enabled us to further experiment and grow. Diverse, inclusive thinking means agility comes naturally and pushes us to consider new ways of doing work. Continuing to evolve our service offering, such as adapting to AI, isn't about keeping up with trends, it's how we protect and scale our purpose.

Over the years, the industry has moved forward on inclusive practice, but where do you think Australasian PR and comms still fall short - and what would you like to see change at a systemic or industry body level?
First, the change I don't want to see is the implications of the global media group's merger on its Australian agencies taking hold, and decimating the moral agency and ability of brilliant creative people to engage and create great work because they are hamstrung by conflicts. This may well be a defining moment for our industry and country.

One area that is in need of a radical overhaul is how we approach data and segmenting audiences.

Organisations around the country have to stop segmenting multicultural and mainstream audiences. Why? Because with 51 per cent of the Australian population considered multicultural, treating them as a separate category effectively 'others' what is now the majority of the audience - which no longer makes sense.

Currently, agencies are either finding a multicultural partner, or thinking about multicultural audiences as a secondary consideration.

Every agency doing that should instead be thinking about integrating all Australian audiences and consumers in their strategic approach, as well as their creative delivery. There's often a lack of data along cultural lines around consumer behaviours too. You don't get great data on the platforms people are pulling data from - You Gov or Roy Morgan, and the brand trackers that big agencies use don't segment by cultural group either, so that's a real gap and opportunity to drive change.

Previous story

MEPRA to hold KSA Leadership Majlis in October

Next story

Regent Hong Kong bolsters comms team with promotion

You might also enjoy

Sefiani
Research

Sefiani unveils new research on AI visibility ownership

Strategic communications consultancy, Sefiani, part of Clarity Global, has released a new study indicating that 84 per cent of Australian marketing and comms leaders disagree on who "owns" AI visibility, while the remaining 16 per cent take an integrated approach.

Conducted by OnePoll on behalf of Sefiani, the research surveyed 150 marketing and communications leaders at Director level and above from organisations with more than 50 employees, exploring how strategies have been adapted in response to AI search.

According to the report, 91 per cent of cross-departmental leaders are revising their strategies to influence AI-driven discovery, although an internal "turf war" is emerging over who controls brands' AI search visibility. The research found that ownership currently sits across five functions: data / analytics (23 per cent), comms / corporate affairs (20 per cent), brand (19 per cent), digital (17 per cent), and performance (16 per cent), which the agency said reflects a structurally fragmented approach within many organisations.

The "silo" challenge
To complement its findings, Sefiani collected qualitative insights from leaders through a series of executive GEO-focused sessions and a recent panel moderated by Mandy Galmes, Managing Partner at Sefiani. Speakers included Johanna Lowe, Chief Marketing and Communications Officer at the University of Sydney; Brad Pogson, Head of Communications at Lendi Group; and Tom Telford, Chief Digital Officer at Clarity Global.

Based on these discussions, several themes emerged around managing reputation in AI-driven environments:

  • Internal silos as a key barrier: Participants noted that while some leaders are encouraging cross-functional experimentation, others remain 'nihilistic' about breaking down traditional departmental walls, leading to stalled effort and wasted budgets. The panel identified the rise of AI as a 'shadow task' layered on top of existing senior role requirements without removing previous duties, which further delays progress.
  • The forever life of reputational issues: According to panellists, LLMs draw on long-term patterns across coverage, reviews, forums, and owned content, meaning historic issues may continue resurfacing in AI-generated responses. This suggests that organisations might need to take a more data-led, cross-channel approach to finding, correcting, and rebalancing inaccurate information.
  • Quality content remains critical: Insights from the discussion indicated that AI models do not discriminate by content format, but they do reward depth. The findings suggest that high-quality, thought leadership content performs better within LLM training sets, so it should be considered as central to strategies across channels moving forward.

The cost of siloed GEO: Misinformation and reputational risk
The agency stated that a lack of clear ownership over GEO is already having tangible consequences. Based on the research, AI search was cited by leaders as the most structurally siloed channel, with 77 per cent reporting problems in the last 12 months. This included a slower response to issues, conflicting messages across channels, and AI tools amplifying yesterday's problems instead of today's narratives.

The study also found that the risk is compounded by the speed at which AI-generated misinformation can spread, with 25 per cent of leaders reporting that incorrect, inconsistent, or outdated brand information has already appeared in AI answers.

"Reputation used to be managed channel by channel, but AI search has changed the rules. Because these systems read across everything - earned coverage, on-site content, social signals, and search authority - siloed marketing and communications are quietly muting your AI visibility," said Tom Telford.

"When your channels don't tell the same story, or teams are chasing independent KPIs with separate budget pots, these silos also become a major reputational liability. It is only when functions are truly connected that the models become trained on a consistent brand message and compound visibility across AI services over time. This is the crux of GEO, Generative Engine Optimisation, and done well it becomes the multiplier on everything you already invest in brand, PR and digital."

The "citations race": PR and earned media take centre stage
The report also suggested that a shift toward AI-first discovery is changing budget priorities.

According to the findings, 49 per cent of leaders have already allocated five to 10 per cent of their marketing and communications budgets to AI visibility, with 90 per cent of that spend being reallocated from traditional channels like paid digital and brand. A further 30 per cent reported allocating up to 20 per cent of their budgets.

Citing external analysis from Gartner, the agency noted that the majority of sources referenced by AI systems are non-paid, which the report argues increases the strategic importance of PR and earned media in AI-driven discovery.

Mandy Galmes said: "When LLMs answer a question in your category, they’re drawing overwhelmingly on non-paid, third party sources. If your spokespeople, experts, case studies and proof points aren’t in those sources, you’re invisible at a key moment in the buyer journey." 

Francesca
Moves

Francesca Talevski moves into education sector with senior comms role

Francesca Talevski has been welcomed at Keypath Education as Senior Manager, Communications & Brand. She has wrapped up close to a decade at Vanguard Australia, most recently as Senior Public Relations Specialist.  

Rhiannon
Moves

Rhiannon Hughes takes up Vivid Sydney contract

Rhiannon Hughes has started as PR Manager for Vivid Sydney at Destination NSW. She was previously at TEAM LEWIS as Campaign Director.

Rhiannon also holds experience at Employsure, Sling & Stone AU / NZ, and Porter Novelli New Zealand.