PR News
<span id="hs_cos_wrapper_name" class="hs_cos_wrapper hs_cos_wrapper_meta_field hs_cos_wrapper_type_text" style="" data-hs-cos-general-type="meta_field" data-hs-cos-type="text" >Perspectives: Doing the write thing with AI</span>

Perspectives: Doing the write thing with AI

'Perspectives' is a Telum Media submitted article series, where diverse viewpoints spark thought-provoking conversations about the role of PR and communications in today's world. This Perspectives piece was submitted by Barry Porter, Founder of Raspberry Communications.

As I transition from Bloomberg to comms, there are grounds for both excitement and concern as media races into the Age of AI.

While AI can churn out copy at superhuman speed, I remain ever more hopeful that the need for gifted human writers will grow as people appreciate new technology's pros and cons.

When I joined Bloomberg as a bureau chief in 2009, it was the year Bloomberg started using AI. That was long before you could order an Uber on your phone, surf the web on Google Chrome, or rent a place to stay with Airbnb.

Fast-forward to today, Bloomberg uses some form of automation in more than a third of its 5,000 daily stories.

Bloomberg News is a good case study to see how this AI revolution might play out as it uses more tech than anywhere and has been at it the longest. It's demanding Terminal customers trade billions daily on news and don’t tolerate mistakes.

Its most recent releases include AI-powered summaries of longer news stories and earnings calls. Both save time for busy professionals.

When I moved into news product development and marketing for Bloomberg a decade ago, I helped roll out some of its earliest AI applications across APAC.

That included news sentiment analysis and natural language processing. Both help make sense of the 200,000+ news and research sources available on the Terminal.

Bloomberg is both pioneering and cautious. Its journalists can’t use Wikipedia or external AI tools, including ChatGPT.

Instead, Bloomberg builds its own applications it can better trust and boasts its own finance-orientated Generative AI model, built using masses of reports and data it's been collecting for decades.

Much of Bloomberg's news technology operates behind the scenes, boosting newsroom efficiency and prompting journalists to write stories by spotting data anomalies. For all but the safest templated stories, a human reporter and editor still ensure quality before publication. It's worth noting that:
  • AI is a time-saving and efficiency tool, not a replacement for experienced writers.
  • It may be great at improving grammar and length, but it can't currently think, show creativity, or display journalistic integrity.
  • It's a probability tool;  facts can't be decided by the roll of a dice.
Newsrooms are grappling with risks in an era where mistakes and disinformation can spread fast.

German journalist, Martin Bernklau, made a shocking discovery when he searched his name on Microsoft's AI tool, Copilot. The tool confused his news reporting with his private life, presenting him as a 54-year-old child molester. If you search "Martin Bernklau" on Copilot today, it cites this as an example of AI hallucinations.

Apple Intelligence recently suspended its AI feature summarising other publications' news alerts due to errors, including wrongly claiming the BBC had reported tennis player Rafael Nadal had come out as gay, and naming a world darts winner hours before the contest began.

Bloomberg Editor-in-Chief, John Micklethwait, predicts AI will change journalists' jobs more than it will replace them. Machines now produce most of its earnings headlines, expanding coverage and freeing up journalists to dig deeper.

"We still employ roughly the same number of people to look at earnings, but the number of companies whose earnings we cover and the depth of coverage around those announcements have both increased dramatically," Micklethwait said in a Bloomberg.com commentary published January 10 th this year. "I would argue, the job has become more interesting. It's not about fast typing, but working out what matters."

I concur. I started out at Bloomberg manually flashing earnings and palm oil headlines at breakneck speed, trying to beat our peers by a few seconds to market-moving news. It was stressful and laborious.

Reporters will still be needed to break news for AI to summarise, also to investigate, add context and commentary. Newsrooms will still need assignment editors. But when it comes to copyediting, Micklethwait predicts you may see AI tools coming into play more and more, restructuring, checking and rewriting drafts.

Now I'm outside Bloomberg, I'm free to use external Generative AI tools in my work. I'm finding them useful for synonyms and definitions, and occasionally tightening language.

While I don't trust them to write content, I suspect many in the comms business will be tempted by the cost, speed and lack of experienced writers.

The computer scientist and essayist, Paul Graham, foresees a world of "writes" and "write nots". He predicts that in a couple of decades, there won't be many people left with the skills to write.

"There will be some people who can write," Graham writes on his blog paulgraham.com. "But the middle ground between those who are good at writing and those who can’t write at all will disappear.”

Original writing requires thinking.

"So a world divided into writes and write nots is more dangerous than it sounds," said Graham. "It will be a world of thinks and think nots."

I know which side I'd like to be on.

Barry Porter spent more than 15 years in senior editorial and management roles at Bloomberg in Singapore and Malaysia before launching Raspberry Communications earlier this year. His agency focuses on the art of modern storytelling through content creation, media and presentation training, and ghostwriting.
Previous story

Perspectives: How to rebuild reputation after a crisis

Next story

Research Wrap: Senate SHJ Crisis Index 300

You might also enjoy

Emma
Moves

Emma Lowde takes up new opportunity in the tech sector

Emma Lowde has started as Senior Communications Manager at Diraq, a Sydney-founded quantum computing company developing silicon-based technology to make quantum computers scalable, economical, and widely accessible. She joins from Intuit, where she was most recently Senior Communications Manager for the APAC region.

Emma has built up 15 years’ experience as a communications professional, including leadership roles at eBay Australia and New Zealand, following agency roles in Australia and the UK. 

Are
Feature

Are media releases dead? What 10,000 journalists told us they want from PR Teams in 2026

Every few years, someone declares the death of the media release.

Today, the arguments sound familiar. Journalists don't read them anymore. Everything is social-first. AI is replacing traditional media outreach. It's all about the pitch. Press releases are becoming little more than AI-generated filler.

And yet, when we speak with journalists across Asia Pacific and the Middle East, a different picture emerges.

Media releases aren't dead, but expectations around them have changed significantly.

We've analysed more than 10,000 Journalist Interest Survey responses in the Telum Media platform collected over the past five years, alongside insights gathered from conversations with editors, reporters, and producers across the region.

Key takeaways:

  1. Journalists still value useful PR content
  2. Relevance matters more than reach
  3. The pitch and the release serve different roles
  4. The best releases reduce friction for journalists
  5. Modern releases need to support multiple platforms

The conclusion is clear: journalists still value media releases, but they value them for different reasons than they once did.

The media release has evolved from a distribution tool into something far more strategic.

The media release is no longer the story

For decades, many PR professionals treated the media release as the centrepiece of media relations activity.

Write the release. Send it widely. Hope for coverage - “spray and pray”.

That approach was far from perfect, but you could get away with it in an era when newsrooms were larger, competition for attention was lower, and journalists had more time to evaluate incoming information.

Today's reality is very different.

Journalists are producing content across multiple platforms, often with smaller teams and tighter deadlines. Their inboxes are flooded with pitches, announcements, thought leadership submissions, and increasingly, AI-generated content.

As a result, journalists have become far more selective about what earns their attention.

The modern media release is no longer just about news stories. It has become a source-of-truth asset, a newsroom resource, and a content hub that supports broader communications activity.

The best PR teams understand this shift.

“The strongest message from journalists can be summarised in a single phrase: ‘Understand what I cover’. Relevance remains the most important factor in successful media engagement.”

What journalists are actually rejecting

One of the most revealing findings from our analysis is that journalists are not rejecting PR content altogether.

What they're rejecting is low-value outreach.

Across thousands of responses, the same frustrations appeared repeatedly:

    • Irrelevant pitches
    • Generic outreach
    • Mass distribution
    • Weak story angles
    • Excessive follow-ups

In other words, this is less a rejection of media releases and more a rejection of poor media relations practice.

The strongest message from journalists can be summarised in a single phrase:

"Understand what I cover."

Relevance remains the most important factor in successful media engagement. In fact, our journalist surveys over the past two years have seen a sharp increase in a desire for both relevance and personalisation in pitches.

Journalists increasingly assess pitches within seconds. If the connection to their beat, audience, or current priorities isn't immediately obvious, the opportunity is often lost before the email is even opened.

The pitch and the release have different jobs

One of the biggest misconceptions in modern media relations is treating the pitch and the release as the same thing.

They are not.

The pitch exists to earn attention; the release exists to support the story.

The best pitches are:

    • Brief
    • Human
    • Relevant
    • Contextual
    • Conversational

The best releases are:

    • Structured
    • Factual
    • Complete
    • Reusable
    • Easy to reference

At a recent Telum Media event, a senior journalist described the fastest way to kill a pitch with a single word: “Respect”. Or a lack thereof.

A generic greeting. A story unrelated to their beat. A mass-produced email that demonstrates no understanding of their audience.

All signal a lack of respect for the journalist's time and expertise.

High-performing PR teams increasingly write pitches and releases for different audiences. The pitch is written for the journalist. The release is written for the journalist's audience.

That distinction matters.

Why journalists still value media releases

Despite predictions of their demise, journalists continue to actively request media releases.

But they want releases that help them work more efficiently.

The most common requests include concise writing, clear headlines, strong news angles, supporting data (with downloadable images and assets), spokesperson access, and easy-to-use formats.

These preferences reveal the modern role of the release: it functions as a workflow tool.

A strong release helps journalists:

    • Understand the story quickly
    • Verify information
    • Access supporting materials
    • Build content efficiently

The best releases reduce friction. And in today's newsroom environment, reducing friction is often more valuable than generating hype.

Think beyond media coverage

Another major shift is that media releases are increasingly serving multiple audiences.

A modern release doesn’t just support journalists; it might also support clients and prospects, employees, investors and analysts, partners, and search visibility.

Rather than creating a single-use document, leading communications teams are building content ecosystems.

The release becomes the foundation for:

    • Media outreach
    • Newsroom content
    • Executive communications
    • Social media content
    • Email campaigns
    • Sales collateral
    • Thought leadership activity

This approach not only improves consistency but also increases the return on investment from every announcement.

Media Releases - Releases today

The role of the modern media release

 

Not every story needs a release

Perhaps one of the most important lessons is recognising when a media release is the wrong tool.

Releases tend to perform best when there is:

    • Genuine news value
    • Multiple stakeholder audiences
    • A need for factual consistency
    • Strong supporting assets
    • Broader business significance

They are often less effective for internal milestones framed as major news (or self-congratulatory announcements), generic thought leadership, and untargeted mass outreach.

In some situations, a targeted pitch, LinkedIn strategy, executive commentary programme, or direct relationship-based outreach may be more effective.

Good communications strategy isn't about defaulting to a media release; it's about choosing the right tool for the objective.

A framework for modern media releases

If there is one word that captures what journalists are asking for today, it is respect.

At Telum Media, we summarise this through the RESPECT framework:

R – Relevance
Make it relevant to the journalist, their audience and the moment.

E – Efficiency
Help journalists work faster through clear, concise, and usable content.

S – Substance
Provide genuine value through expertise, data, insight, or access.

P – Personalisation
Demonstrate that you've done your homework.

E – Ecosystem
Think beyond the release and consider how it supports broader communications goals.

C – Clarity
Make the key message immediately obvious.

T – Timing
Reach out at the right time, not simply any time.

Media Releases - RESPECT

What journalists are asking for in a pitch / media release: RESPECT

 

The future of the media release

The debate over whether media releases are dead misses the point.

The more useful question is how do we make releases work better in today’s media environment?

Journalists still value relevant information, credible sources, strong story angles, and efficient communication. Media releases continue to play an important role in delivering those things.

But success today depends less on the existence of the release itself and more on how strategically it is used.

The media release remains a valuable communications tool.

Just not in the way many of us were taught to use it.

 

FAQs

Are media releases still useful in 2026?

Yes. Journalists still value media releases, but these days want targeted outreach, relevance to their beat, alignment with their audience, and contextual pitching.

What makes a media release useful to journalists?

Journalists are looking for releases in a format that helps them work efficiently. Which means releases that are concise, factual, with a clear angle, contain usable quotes, and come with downloadable assets and supporting data.

What is the difference between a pitch and a media release?

A pitch earns the journalist’s attention in their cluttered Inbox. A media release supports the story by providing structured, factual, and reusable information relevant to their audience.

 

With more than 30 years’ experience spanning journalism, corporate communications and media intelligence, Reuben Aitchison is Telum Media’s Head of Insights and Communications.

Explore Telum Media tools that help PR teams pitch with precision. 

Rika
Moves

Rika Rufina promoted to Communications Manager

PR and communications agency, Wrights, has promoted Rika Rufina to Communication Manager, strengthening the agency’s integrated communications, issues management, and Asia Pacific capabilities.

Rika will help steer corporate and consumer retainer accounts, bringing together PR, social, and creative campaigns. She will also work with Chief Executive Officer Douglas Wright and General Manager Reena Llanillo to develop and implement issues management strategies.

Rika joined Wrights in August 2025 as a Senior Communication Consultant, bringing experience from PR agencies, as well as from in-house roles across APAC, particularly in the Singapore market.

Douglas said Rika’s promotion reflected the contribution she had made to the agency and its clients.

“Rika has delivered strong results. I look forward to working closer with her and the Wrights team as we continue to deliver ingenious and impactful communications, anchored in authenticity and positive change,” he said.

“Our secret sauce is simple: ingenious thinking, brought to life by a talented and ambitious team. Rika’s promotion is another important step in strengthening our team and setting Wrights up for its next phase of growth.”

The promotion forms part of a broader period of growth for Wrights, with the agency also promoting Charlotte Dickson to Communication Consultant and will welcome Annabel Chambers as PR and Social Coordinator.