PR News
<span id="hs_cos_wrapper_name" class="hs_cos_wrapper hs_cos_wrapper_meta_field hs_cos_wrapper_type_text" style="" data-hs-cos-general-type="meta_field" data-hs-cos-type="text" >Perspectives: Doing the write thing with AI</span>

Perspectives: Doing the write thing with AI

'Perspectives' is a Telum Media submitted article series, where diverse viewpoints spark thought-provoking conversations about the role of PR and communications in today's world. This Perspectives piece was submitted by Barry Porter, Founder of Raspberry Communications.

As I transition from Bloomberg to comms, there are grounds for both excitement and concern as media races into the Age of AI.

While AI can churn out copy at superhuman speed, I remain ever more hopeful that the need for gifted human writers will grow as people appreciate new technology's pros and cons.

When I joined Bloomberg as a bureau chief in 2009, it was the year Bloomberg started using AI. That was long before you could order an Uber on your phone, surf the web on Google Chrome, or rent a place to stay with Airbnb.

Fast-forward to today, Bloomberg uses some form of automation in more than a third of its 5,000 daily stories.

Bloomberg News is a good case study to see how this AI revolution might play out as it uses more tech than anywhere and has been at it the longest. It's demanding Terminal customers trade billions daily on news and don’t tolerate mistakes.

Its most recent releases include AI-powered summaries of longer news stories and earnings calls. Both save time for busy professionals.

When I moved into news product development and marketing for Bloomberg a decade ago, I helped roll out some of its earliest AI applications across APAC.

That included news sentiment analysis and natural language processing. Both help make sense of the 200,000+ news and research sources available on the Terminal.

Bloomberg is both pioneering and cautious. Its journalists can’t use Wikipedia or external AI tools, including ChatGPT.

Instead, Bloomberg builds its own applications it can better trust and boasts its own finance-orientated Generative AI model, built using masses of reports and data it's been collecting for decades.

Much of Bloomberg's news technology operates behind the scenes, boosting newsroom efficiency and prompting journalists to write stories by spotting data anomalies. For all but the safest templated stories, a human reporter and editor still ensure quality before publication. It's worth noting that:
  • AI is a time-saving and efficiency tool, not a replacement for experienced writers.
  • It may be great at improving grammar and length, but it can't currently think, show creativity, or display journalistic integrity.
  • It's a probability tool;  facts can't be decided by the roll of a dice.
Newsrooms are grappling with risks in an era where mistakes and disinformation can spread fast.

German journalist, Martin Bernklau, made a shocking discovery when he searched his name on Microsoft's AI tool, Copilot. The tool confused his news reporting with his private life, presenting him as a 54-year-old child molester. If you search "Martin Bernklau" on Copilot today, it cites this as an example of AI hallucinations.

Apple Intelligence recently suspended its AI feature summarising other publications' news alerts due to errors, including wrongly claiming the BBC had reported tennis player Rafael Nadal had come out as gay, and naming a world darts winner hours before the contest began.

Bloomberg Editor-in-Chief, John Micklethwait, predicts AI will change journalists' jobs more than it will replace them. Machines now produce most of its earnings headlines, expanding coverage and freeing up journalists to dig deeper.

"We still employ roughly the same number of people to look at earnings, but the number of companies whose earnings we cover and the depth of coverage around those announcements have both increased dramatically," Micklethwait said in a Bloomberg.com commentary published January 10 th this year. "I would argue, the job has become more interesting. It's not about fast typing, but working out what matters."

I concur. I started out at Bloomberg manually flashing earnings and palm oil headlines at breakneck speed, trying to beat our peers by a few seconds to market-moving news. It was stressful and laborious.

Reporters will still be needed to break news for AI to summarise, also to investigate, add context and commentary. Newsrooms will still need assignment editors. But when it comes to copyediting, Micklethwait predicts you may see AI tools coming into play more and more, restructuring, checking and rewriting drafts.

Now I'm outside Bloomberg, I'm free to use external Generative AI tools in my work. I'm finding them useful for synonyms and definitions, and occasionally tightening language.

While I don't trust them to write content, I suspect many in the comms business will be tempted by the cost, speed and lack of experienced writers.

The computer scientist and essayist, Paul Graham, foresees a world of "writes" and "write nots". He predicts that in a couple of decades, there won't be many people left with the skills to write.

"There will be some people who can write," Graham writes on his blog paulgraham.com. "But the middle ground between those who are good at writing and those who can’t write at all will disappear.”

Original writing requires thinking.

"So a world divided into writes and write nots is more dangerous than it sounds," said Graham. "It will be a world of thinks and think nots."

I know which side I'd like to be on.

Barry Porter spent more than 15 years in senior editorial and management roles at Bloomberg in Singapore and Malaysia before launching Raspberry Communications earlier this year. His agency focuses on the art of modern storytelling through content creation, media and presentation training, and ghostwriting.
Previous story

Perspectives: How to rebuild reputation after a crisis

Next story

Research Wrap: Senate SHJ Crisis Index 300

You might also enjoy

PixVerse
Moves

PixVerse appoints Head of Global PR

Robyn Tan has been named Head of Global PR at PixVerse, an AI video generation platform. Based in Singapore, she leads PR and media relations across international markets, and serves as Chief Representative of Singapore, overseeing on-ground presence and community relations in the region. 

Sefiani
Research

Sefiani unveils new research on AI visibility ownership

Strategic communications consultancy, Sefiani, part of Clarity Global, has released a new study indicating that 84 per cent of Australian marketing and comms leaders disagree on who "owns" AI visibility, while the remaining 16 per cent take an integrated approach.

Conducted by OnePoll on behalf of Sefiani, the research surveyed 150 marketing and communications leaders at Director level and above from organisations with more than 50 employees, exploring how strategies have been adapted in response to AI search.

According to the report, 91 per cent of cross-departmental leaders are revising their strategies to influence AI-driven discovery, although an internal "turf war" is emerging over who controls brands' AI search visibility. The research found that ownership currently sits across five functions: data / analytics (23 per cent), comms / corporate affairs (20 per cent), brand (19 per cent), digital (17 per cent), and performance (16 per cent), which the agency said reflects a structurally fragmented approach within many organisations.

The "silo" challenge
To complement its findings, Sefiani collected qualitative insights from leaders through a series of executive GEO-focused sessions and a recent panel moderated by Mandy Galmes, Managing Partner at Sefiani. Speakers included Johanna Lowe, Chief Marketing and Communications Officer at the University of Sydney; Brad Pogson, Head of Communications at Lendi Group; and Tom Telford, Chief Digital Officer at Clarity Global.

Based on these discussions, several themes emerged around managing reputation in AI-driven environments:

  • Internal silos as a key barrier: Participants noted that while some leaders are encouraging cross-functional experimentation, others remain 'nihilistic' about breaking down traditional departmental walls, leading to stalled effort and wasted budgets. The panel identified the rise of AI as a 'shadow task' layered on top of existing senior role requirements without removing previous duties, which further delays progress.
  • The forever life of reputational issues: According to panellists, LLMs draw on long-term patterns across coverage, reviews, forums, and owned content, meaning historic issues may continue resurfacing in AI-generated responses. This suggests that organisations might need to take a more data-led, cross-channel approach to finding, correcting, and rebalancing inaccurate information.
  • Quality content remains critical: Insights from the discussion indicated that AI models do not discriminate by content format, but they do reward depth. The findings suggest that high-quality, thought leadership content performs better within LLM training sets, so it should be considered as central to strategies across channels moving forward.

The cost of siloed GEO: Misinformation and reputational risk
The agency stated that a lack of clear ownership over GEO is already having tangible consequences. Based on the research, AI search was cited by leaders as the most structurally siloed channel, with 77 per cent reporting problems in the last 12 months. This included a slower response to issues, conflicting messages across channels, and AI tools amplifying yesterday's problems instead of today's narratives.

The study also found that the risk is compounded by the speed at which AI-generated misinformation can spread, with 25 per cent of leaders reporting that incorrect, inconsistent, or outdated brand information has already appeared in AI answers.

"Reputation used to be managed channel by channel, but AI search has changed the rules. Because these systems read across everything - earned coverage, on-site content, social signals, and search authority - siloed marketing and communications are quietly muting your AI visibility," said Tom Telford.

"When your channels don't tell the same story, or teams are chasing independent KPIs with separate budget pots, these silos also become a major reputational liability. It is only when functions are truly connected that the models become trained on a consistent brand message and compound visibility across AI services over time. This is the crux of GEO, Generative Engine Optimisation, and done well it becomes the multiplier on everything you already invest in brand, PR and digital."

The "citations race": PR and earned media take centre stage
The report also suggested that a shift toward AI-first discovery is changing budget priorities.

According to the findings, 49 per cent of leaders have already allocated five to 10 per cent of their marketing and communications budgets to AI visibility, with 90 per cent of that spend being reallocated from traditional channels like paid digital and brand. A further 30 per cent reported allocating up to 20 per cent of their budgets.

Citing external analysis from Gartner, the agency noted that the majority of sources referenced by AI systems are non-paid, which the report argues increases the strategic importance of PR and earned media in AI-driven discovery.

Mandy Galmes said: "When LLMs answer a question in your category, they’re drawing overwhelmingly on non-paid, third party sources. If your spokespeople, experts, case studies and proof points aren’t in those sources, you’re invisible at a key moment in the buyer journey." 

Royal
Moves

Royal Plaza on Scotts names marcomms director

Irwin Lim has been appointed Director of Marketing Communications at Royal Plaza on Scotts. In this role, he oversees brand, communications, content, campaigns, media relations, and marketing initiatives across the hotel’s key business areas.

Most recently, Irwin was Director of Marketing at Pan Pacific Orchard, Singapore.