One of the things students often don’t realise about PR and communications is that there’s no single pathway into the industry. Some professionals begin their careers through the traditional route of a relevant degree, while others arrive from adjacent fields such as journalism, events, hospitality, or education.
With university enrolments and new semesters underway, Telum Media spoke with three communications professionals across Australia, Hong Kong, and Singapore to understand how they landed in PR. They share what first drew them to the industry and why they chose to stay - offering insight into the skills, realities, and lessons that shape a career in PR and communications.
Nikole Duong, Media Relations Manager, L’Oréal Groupe Australia and New Zealand
I didn't start my career in public relations, and now corporate affairs - I came from learning and development. That’s where I learnt how adults absorb information, why clarity matters, and how important it is to explain things in a way people understand. It's helped shape the way I work today: simplify the nuance, honour the context, and never assume people know what you mean just because you've said the words.
I've been lucky to have worked for large organisations that invest in their people, and along the way, I've had some amazing leaders who have really backed me. They encouraged me, opened doors, and helped me see the strengths I didn't realise were valuable in corporate affairs - listening, writing clearly, staying calm under pressure, and my favourite part, connecting with all sorts of people.
Working across various local Australian and global brands has shown me how varied and rewarding this field is. For any students thinking about this path, corporate affairs is a great choice if you're curious, steady, and genuinely interested in people. You work with different teams, solve real problems, help leaders communicate honestly, and make sure people feel informed when things are changing. If that sounds like you, it’s a career worth exploring!
Tweety Chan, PR Manager, APAC, Sumsub
I did not set out to build a "typical" PR career. My early years were in hospitality and events, working on experiences that brought people together and made them feel looked after.
When I first joined a PR agency, "PR" itself felt like a vague label, and I had little idea what a practitioner actually did day to day. I took it as a challenge, and it quickly became a crash course in three things: creative thinking, teamwork, and strategy. There was never a textbook answer to any brief. Instead, every campaign demanded original thinking, a team where everyone carried real weight, and a strategic lens that moved from the big picture to the smallest detail.
After several fulfilling years in the agency space, I took on another challenge and moved in‑house. Today, I look after PR for the APAC region at a global RegTech company, where the most rewarding part is seeing communications turn into tangible business impact across multiple markets, not just campaign metrics. It is a daily reminder that PR is integral to how organisations grow, build trust, and navigate complexity.
PR is not an easy profession - it demands adaptability, stamina, and a lot of creativity. But if you enjoy both the process and the outcome, from problem‑solving with your team to watching your work shape real‑world results, it can be an incredibly energising and meaningful career.
Vladimir Guevarra, Head of Communications, Yinson Production
I didn't actually plan to end up in PR. I started in journalism, writing for The Straits Times, The Wall Street Journal, and Dow Jones Newswires. Back then, I loved the chase for the news, finding the signal inside the complexity, and helping the public understand what was really going on.
People won't believe it, but there's an introvert in me. In fact, many reporters are the same. I had to learn to be more of an extrovert to do my job - to interview, to engage, to express. For instance, when I was a student activist, I realised very quickly that our mission was far more important than our fear, or my fear, of public speaking. So I focused on getting the message out - not the fear, not the noise, not the bells and whistles. And I still live by that principle today.
As I moved and grew into corporate communications, I had the conviction that PR isn't spin, or at least, it shouldn't be - it's translation. It's taking finance, technology, energy, regulation, geopolitics, and making them more human, meaningful, and useful. It's helping leaders speak clearly and responsibly.
Across banking, telco, tech, and offshore energy, these industries I've been serving may be varied, but the meaning of the work remains the same: good communication builds trust, good messaging shapes understanding, and good storytelling creates alignment, not division.
And that's why I choose PR. Because when words are used well - with clarity and courage - they become a force for progress and change.
Telum Vox Pop: Why did you choose PR as your career?
Telum Media creating connections
Get in touch to learn more
Entries open for the 2026 PRINZ Awards
You might also enjoy
Robyn Tan has been named Head of Global PR at PixVerse, an AI video generation platform. Based in Singapore, she leads PR and media relations across international markets, and serves as Chief Representative of Singapore, overseeing on-ground presence and community relations in the region.
Strategic communications consultancy, Sefiani, part of Clarity Global, has released a new study indicating that 84 per cent of Australian marketing and comms leaders disagree on who "owns" AI visibility, while the remaining 16 per cent take an integrated approach.
Conducted by OnePoll on behalf of Sefiani, the research surveyed 150 marketing and communications leaders at Director level and above from organisations with more than 50 employees, exploring how strategies have been adapted in response to AI search.
According to the report, 91 per cent of cross-departmental leaders are revising their strategies to influence AI-driven discovery, although an internal "turf war" is emerging over who controls brands' AI search visibility. The research found that ownership currently sits across five functions: data / analytics (23 per cent), comms / corporate affairs (20 per cent), brand (19 per cent), digital (17 per cent), and performance (16 per cent), which the agency said reflects a structurally fragmented approach within many organisations.
The "silo" challenge
To complement its findings, Sefiani collected qualitative insights from leaders through a series of executive GEO-focused sessions and a recent panel moderated by Mandy Galmes, Managing Partner at Sefiani. Speakers included Johanna Lowe, Chief Marketing and Communications Officer at the University of Sydney; Brad Pogson, Head of Communications at Lendi Group; and Tom Telford, Chief Digital Officer at Clarity Global.
Based on these discussions, several themes emerged around managing reputation in AI-driven environments:
- Internal silos as a key barrier: Participants noted that while some leaders are encouraging cross-functional experimentation, others remain 'nihilistic' about breaking down traditional departmental walls, leading to stalled effort and wasted budgets. The panel identified the rise of AI as a 'shadow task' layered on top of existing senior role requirements without removing previous duties, which further delays progress.
- The forever life of reputational issues: According to panellists, LLMs draw on long-term patterns across coverage, reviews, forums, and owned content, meaning historic issues may continue resurfacing in AI-generated responses. This suggests that organisations might need to take a more data-led, cross-channel approach to finding, correcting, and rebalancing inaccurate information.
- Quality content remains critical: Insights from the discussion indicated that AI models do not discriminate by content format, but they do reward depth. The findings suggest that high-quality, thought leadership content performs better within LLM training sets, so it should be considered as central to strategies across channels moving forward.
The cost of siloed GEO: Misinformation and reputational risk
The agency stated that a lack of clear ownership over GEO is already having tangible consequences. Based on the research, AI search was cited by leaders as the most structurally siloed channel, with 77 per cent reporting problems in the last 12 months. This included a slower response to issues, conflicting messages across channels, and AI tools amplifying yesterday's problems instead of today's narratives.
The study also found that the risk is compounded by the speed at which AI-generated misinformation can spread, with 25 per cent of leaders reporting that incorrect, inconsistent, or outdated brand information has already appeared in AI answers.
"Reputation used to be managed channel by channel, but AI search has changed the rules. Because these systems read across everything - earned coverage, on-site content, social signals, and search authority - siloed marketing and communications are quietly muting your AI visibility," said Tom Telford.
"When your channels don't tell the same story, or teams are chasing independent KPIs with separate budget pots, these silos also become a major reputational liability. It is only when functions are truly connected that the models become trained on a consistent brand message and compound visibility across AI services over time. This is the crux of GEO, Generative Engine Optimisation, and done well it becomes the multiplier on everything you already invest in brand, PR and digital."
The "citations race": PR and earned media take centre stage
The report also suggested that a shift toward AI-first discovery is changing budget priorities.
According to the findings, 49 per cent of leaders have already allocated five to 10 per cent of their marketing and communications budgets to AI visibility, with 90 per cent of that spend being reallocated from traditional channels like paid digital and brand. A further 30 per cent reported allocating up to 20 per cent of their budgets.
Citing external analysis from Gartner, the agency noted that the majority of sources referenced by AI systems are non-paid, which the report argues increases the strategic importance of PR and earned media in AI-driven discovery.
Mandy Galmes said: "When LLMs answer a question in your category, they’re drawing overwhelmingly on non-paid, third party sources. If your spokespeople, experts, case studies and proof points aren’t in those sources, you’re invisible at a key moment in the buyer journey."
Irwin Lim has been appointed Director of Marketing Communications at Royal Plaza on Scotts. In this role, he oversees brand, communications, content, campaigns, media relations, and marketing initiatives across the hotel’s key business areas.
Most recently, Irwin was Director of Marketing at Pan Pacific Orchard, Singapore.