PR News
Impactful public speaking vox pop

Telum Vox Pop: Impactful Public Speaking and Media Engagement

The art of public speaking and media engagement goes beyond polished and prepared talking points and facts - they are built on authenticity, empathy, and the ability to connect through storytelling.

Telum Media spoke to Tim Ayliffe and Steve Carey, seasoned TV journalists turned communications professionals, who shared how preparation, emotional intelligence, and purpose can elevate any engagement. Their advice underscores that lasting impact comes from balancing authority with compassion and delivering messages that connect with audiences.

What are the key elements that make media interviews and public speaking engagements impactful?

Steve Carey
The key to impactful speaking lies in connecting with your audience in a way that feels real and memorable. Those who speak with passion, conviction, and a sense of purpose tend to leave a mark.

Strong anecdotes or personal stories help bridge the gap between the speaker and the listener because they are relatable. For example, a victim of crime sharing the raw shock, fear, and long-term impact of their experience, or a champion footballer celebrating a win, showing the elation through voice, movement, and emotion.

Ultimately, it's about having a strong, authentic message that resonates with a wider audience, delivered with honesty and clarity. Those who bring a deadpan or listless energy tend to fail and certainly don’t connect with anyone watching, reading or listening.

Tim Ayliffe
Three things come to mind: authenticity, honesty, and what I like to call "relating the personal".

Whether people agree with you or not, they will always listen when they feel a connection. Sharing something personal or drawn from real life can often achieve that.

Media interviews and public speaking engagements are storytelling opportunities, so it is important to make sure you have a good story to tell.

Throughout your career, you've seen countless examples of people engaging with the media or speaking publicly. What's one common thing they often get wrong without realising?

Tim Ayliffe

People who rely too heavily on talking points lose audiences quickly because they come across as inauthentic and rehearsed. Those who are overwhelmingly negative can also lead to audiences switching off.

Steve Carey
The most common mistake is people not taking a strong position. Sitting on the fence and "waffling" provides journalists and the audience with little value.

To avoid this, always:
• Know what you want to say (top three messages) and rehearse it.
• Pressure-test your arguments with a colleague or trainer before facing the media or audience.
• Bring fresh data or a strong case study to back up your story.
• Avoid jargon or acronyms, as they are barriers to clear communication.

Soft skills like empathy and emotional intelligence are often overlooked in public speaking. How do they influence how a message is received, and how can professionals strengthen these skills?

Steve Carey
Empathy and emotional intelligence shape how your message is received, particularly when delivering tough or sensitive news.

Some key approaches include:
• Consider how the audience will hear and interpret your words - what do they want / need to hear?
• In a crisis, acknowledge those directly affected first because it sets the tone.
• Always ask yourself, "Does this pass the pub test?" If not, think again!
• Rehearse your top three messages with a trusted colleague or professional.

These steps ensure your message balances authority with compassion and respect.

Tim Ayliffe
Real-life examples that support an argument are crucial to a good interview, or speech. Relating a topic to people shows a level of empathy and understanding that is crucial to delivering messages that people will understand and connect with.

When preparing for a media interview or major presentation, what are your top strategies for delivering with impact and managing nerves?

Tim Ayliffe
No matter how experienced you are, you should always have a plan for every public speaking opportunity.

If you are someone who likes to write notes, ensure they're short and in bullet-point form so that you don't get caught out trying to recite a script. But once the interview starts, put your notes away - you won't need them if you have prepared properly.

Also, take a moment for yourself before the interview begins and avoid rushing.

Steve Carey
Preparation and mindset are critical. To deliver with impact, know your topic and craft three clear key messages, rehearse using plain and conversational language, and use a strong anecdote or key data point to set the tone.

For managing nerves, three simple strategies work well. Take several deep breaths before speaking to calm your nerves and steady your voice. Drop your shoulders slightly to reduce tension, which improves overall delivery. Finally, imagine the audience as family friends to shift into a more relaxed storytelling mode.

Many junior professionals hesitate to voice their opinions in meetings or on public platforms. What advice would you give to help them step out of their comfort zone and build confidence in speaking up?

Steve Carey
Confidence grows through preparation and practice.

To step out of your comfort zone, frame your question or comment in terms of its value to the business or audience. Judge the moment and take opportunities when invited. Keep your contributions short, sharp, and to the point. And, accept that the first attempt may not be perfect, but persistence will build confidence.

The more often you contribute, the easier and more natural it becomes.

Tim Ayliffe
People should never be afraid to speak up if they have something important or valuable to add. Pick your moment and keep your cool.

Previous story

IP Excellera expands UAE operations into Abu Dhabi, appoints lead

Next story

Recognition consolidates its four agencies into one

You might also enjoy

Leadership
Moves

Leadership appointment at FleishmanHillard Singapore

Aaron Tan has joined FleishmanHillard as Auto Practice Lead and Account Director, bringing experience across branding, communications, marketing and digital strategy.


Based in Singapore, he has accumulated more than 15 years of experience, having previously held senior roles at agencies including The Ate Group and W Communications.

Study
Research

Study Highlight: AI trust higher among Chinese public than in the West, Edelman poll finds

In 2025, artificial intelligence sits at the centre of growing global divides. Across economies and generations, engagement with AI is revealing widening gaps in trust, understanding, and opportunity.

Chinese AI trust landscape
The 2025 Edelman Trust Barometer Flash Poll: Trust and Artificial Intelligence at a Crossroads reveals that respondents in Mainland China demonstrates high trust in AI compared to developed markets, including the US, UK, Brazil and Germany.

87 per cent of Chinese respondents say they trust AI, a figure that increased by 9 per cent   between November 2023 and October 2025. This compares with trust levels of 32 per cent in the US, 36 per cent in the UK, and 39 per cent in Germany.

Strong embrace of AI adoption
High trust in AI among Chinese respondents also translates into their everyday use. 60 per cent of Chinese employees use AI weekly or more, while 49 per cent say they embrace its growing use, compared with just 18 per cent who reject it.

Acceptance is particularly strong in sectors shaping future growth. 43 per cent of financial services workers and 55 per cent of technology sector employees report embracing AI in their work, highlighting how quickly the technology is becoming embedded in professional life.

Optimism over fear of disruption 
Unlike Western markets, where AI is often framed as a threat, Chinese respondents remain broadly optimistic. At least 67 per cent believe generative AI will help rather than harm society, including in areas such as climate change, work life, mental health, social cohesion, and economic equity.

Fear of economic displacement is notably low. Only 26 per cent worry that people like them will be left behind by AI, the lowest level among all surveyed markets. Even among lower-income respondents, concern rises to just 36 per cent.

A broad ecosystem of trust
Mainland China’s confidence in AI extends across all categories of AI communicators. 87 per cent trust 'people like themselves' to speak truthfully about AI, 88 per cent trust friends and family, and 85 per cent trust coworkers.

Trust in institutions and authority figures is similarly high, including 87 per cent for scientists and AI researchers, 83 per cent for CEOs, and 84 per cent for journalists and technology influencers.

More than 70 per cent of respondents are comfortable with their employer's use of AI - the highest rate amongst countries surveyed, while 60 per cent are comfortable with the media's AI usage.

Trust issues outweigh other barriers
Despite high overall trust, some barriers to AI adoption exist in Mainland China. Among infrequent users, 43 per cent cite trust concerns such as data protection, 28 per cent worry about how data will be protected, and 19 per cent are concerned about how their data will be used. Issues of motivation and access affect 40 per cent, while discomfort with technology is cited by just 15 per cent.

However these barriers are significantly lower than in Western markets, where 55 to 70 per cent of infrequent users identify trust as the main obstacle to AI adoption.

Ultimately, the Edelman Flash Poll highlights a simple point: trust shapes adoption. Mainland China’s high public confidence supports faster and broader use of AI, while lower trust in Western markets aligns with a more cautious pace. These differences underline how public attitudes influence the trajectory of technological change across regions.

Study
Research

Study Highlight: Beyond ESG: Global perspectives on communicating impact

PROI has released their latest report, "Beyond ESG: Global perspectives on communicating impact". With insights from 11 global communications agencies, the report highlights key trends shaping how ESG and purpose will be communicated in 2026.

Ted Deutsch, Executive Managing Director of RF|Binder and Chair of PROI's ESG Working Group, said: "While certain markets are shying away from acronyms and terms that are seen as overly political, this PROI report confirms that companies are still focused on driving change through sustainability, corporate culture and good governance. The challenge now lies in communicating this with authenticity."

ESG across the regions
ESG maturity differs widely by region. Markets such as Australia, Switzerland, and the Middle East operate in relatively advanced regulatory environments. In Australia especially, Paula Cowan, Managing Director at ImpactInstitute, described ESG as no longer a "nice to have," but rather a licence to operate.

Meanwhile, countries such as Poland and the Czech Republic are experiencing signs of ESG fatigue. As Dirk Aarts, CEO of 24/7 Communication, observed in Poland: "...enthusiasm has cooled. Many businesses now treat ESG chiefly as a regulatory requirement rather than a reputational advantage."

In Thailand, ESG is viewed as central to long-term competitiveness, economic resilience, and access to global markets. Whereas in Ukraine, ESG is shaped by wartime realities and EU integration, with social impact and resilience taking precedence.

Despite their differences, one thing stays consistent: stakeholder expectations are converging. The report highlights how companies are increasingly expected to demonstrate real progress and credible outcomes rather than just showing intent.

Global pressures driving change
It was reported that every region, in one way or another, was being impacted by global forces reshaping their ESG communications. Regulatory alignment stood out as a major driver, particularly around mandates by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), and other international disclosure frameworks.

Trade-related mechanisms, such as the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, have resulted in a push for ESG adoption in export-oriented economies like Thailand. Chelsea King, Head of PR Operations and Editorial Director Midas PR, explained: "This creates direct financial pressure and has spurred Thailand’s domestic carbon tax and mandatory reporting efforts."

Political dynamics also play a significant role, with the U.S. becoming the focal point of ESG politicisation, influencing corporate behaviour across multiple markets. This has contributed to more cautious language globally. For example, in Canada, "...U.S. discourse has influenced Canadian corporate leaders to reconsider how explicitly they use the 'ESG' label," said Kimberly Cohen, CEO of Brown & Cohen.

At the same time, global enforcement action against greenwashing is increasing in Canada, as well as other markets such as Australia, Switzerland, and the UK, reinforcing a shift toward proof-based communication.

Language and framing
The report outlined a clear global trend: the declining use of the acronyms "ESG" and "DEI" in public-facing communications. While these terms remain common in investor, regulatory, and technical contexts, organisations are shifting toward simpler and less politicised language, such as "sustainability," "responsible business," "resilience," and "impact."

Kimberly noted that in Canada, these acronyms are increasingly being broken down into their component parts, whereas in Poland, Dirk explained that the narrative now focuses on health, quality of life, and local community impact - moving away from war language, such as "fighting climate change," toward tangible well-being. This shift doesn't reflect a divergence from ESG principles, but rather as an effort to improve clarity, reduce political risk, and connect more directly with local audiences.

Across several regions, including Canada, the UK, the U.S., Thailand, and the Middle East, an increase in social initiatives continues, but under different labels, such as workforce development, inclusion and belonging, human capital management, and community impact.

Communications challenges
Across all regions, communications leaders are reported to have been facing similar challenges, particularly in balancing ambition with credibility. Stakeholders expect companies to act, but are increasingly rejecting vague or exaggerated claims. Greenwashing, social-washing, and "greenhushing" - deliberately under-communicating progress, which is reported to be rising in Australia - are recurring risks.

Another challenge is internal alignment. ESG data and narratives often sit across multiple functions at an organisation, and when teams are not aligned, messaging can become inconsistent or fragmented, resulting in a lack of trust. In sensitive contexts, such as in Ukraine or politically polarised markets like the U.S. and UK, audiences are sceptical and quick to point out inauthenticity.

Looking ahead
Contributors generally predict that over the next two to three years, ESG communications are expected to become more integrated with financial reporting and core business strategy. Many regions anticipate stricter disclosure requirements, greater use of assurance, and increased focus on governance as the foundation for environmental and social credibility.

Media scrutiny is also intensifying. Investigative reporting on ESG claims is growing, while routine sustainability announcements receive less attention unless backed by data or clear outcomes. At the same time, there is continued demand for accessible explanations, case studies, and stories that demonstrate how ESG efforts deliver tangible benefits to communities, employees, and economies.

Practical guidance for communications professionals
Based on insights across all 11 markets, some common practical guidance include:

  • Lead with evidence: Anchor claims in data, defined methodologies, and disclosures, with assurance.
  • Adapt language and be precise: Localise messaging and ensure clear messaging that resonates with target audiences, while avoiding unnecessary jargon.
  • Show progress over time: Share interim milestones and regular updates to demonstrate momentum and avoid greenwashing or greenhushing.
  • Integrate ESG into the business narrative: Position environmental, social, and governance efforts as part of core strategy and operations, rather than a standalone initiative globally.

Find the full report, including in-depth insights for each region, here.