Product and campaign launches are rarely simple. In regulated industries, communications teams are increasingly responsible not just for promoting launches, but helping determine whether they are viable in the first place.
PR and communications professionals need to work within strict regulatory frameworks, keep up with policy changes, and ensure messaging remains compliant across every market. A misstep can lead to reputational damage, regulatory action, or loss of public trust.
Telum Media spoke with senior in-house and agency PR and communications professionals working across the finance sector to understand how teams can balance stakeholder ambition with regulatory responsibility, navigate grey areas, and manage risk when launching products across multiple markets.
Bring communications in before plans are set
For Prisita Menon, PayPal’s Head of Communications, Asia, communications teams are most effective when they are involved before a go-to-market strategy is finalised.
"As strategic advisors, in-house communications teams play a critical role at the intersection of commercial ambition and regulatory responsibility. Ideally, we should be involved early in shaping go-to-market strategies, helping to anticipate risks and define messaging approaches before plans are fully formed.”
That early involvement is not always guaranteed, however. Prisita warns that tight timelines and misconceptions about when communications should be engaged can limit early input.
"Commercial priorities often move at speed, driven by market dynamics and business goals. This can make it challenging for cross-functional teams such as legal, compliance, marketing, and communications to stay aligned," she said.
For communications professionals, the challenge is often less about reacting to risk and more about identifying potential friction points before a launch strategy is fully developed. That means understanding stakeholder objectives and mapping them against regulatory requirements, industry standards, and customer expectations.
Joyce Lee, APAC Account Director at Montieth SPRG in Hong Kong, adds an agency perspective. For her, the work starts with understanding what the client wants to achieve and what audiences in each market need. But most importantly, underneath both sits what regulators allow - which is what she describes as the foundation everything else is built on.
"Agencies that get this right are in the room from day one, before the strategy is locked," she said.
Scott Schuberg, Managing Director of Cognito in Australia, said communications advice can also shape decisions before a launch is fully formed.
"...as much as communications can be considered the end point of operations, it is common that strategic communications advice can drive operational requirements - the tail does wag the dog, on occasion."
Get the right people in the room early
Prisita advised that in-house communications teams should not operate in silos. Instead, they should facilitate scenario planning with key decision-makers to surface trade-offs early and reduce friction.
"Cross-functional input is essential when navigating regulatory grey areas. Communications teams should actively consult stakeholders to form well-rounded recommendations," she said.
That coordination becomes particularly important in markets where licensing, permissions, or regulatory expectations differ from a brand's home market.
Scott said compliance should help guide how communications are managed when entering new markets.
"Although it can really pour cold water on what might be an otherwise-eminently-saleable campaign to the media, a firm compliance function should advise the process for managing comms in new markets, in conjunction with the reasonable requirement to profile a company's story."
Prisita said teams should consider which marketing guardrails apply when entering a non-licensed market, as well as the regulatory implications or reputational risks of not adhering to them. She added that, for in-house comms teams, external expertise can be helpful.
Public affairs consultancies can provide in-depth analysis of local regulations and offer an independent viewpoint. If external partners are not feasible, in-house government relations teams should be consulted early, as their insights often underpin communications strategy.
Build messages around what regulators allow
In regulated industries, a strong message is not enough - it needs to be permissible.
"In regulated sectors like financial services, what can be promoted is very clearly defined, and not everything a client wants to say is legally allowed to be promoted directly to their customers," Joyce said.
Audience, channel, and jurisdiction all matter. A message suitable for one investor segment or market may not be appropriate for another. She added that rules are not always consistent or evenly enforced across markets, so communicators need to understand where grey areas may exist.
Using crypto-linked sports betting promotions as an example, Joyce said: "It is banned in China and South Korea, but not categorically off-limits across the rest of APAC. In many markets it sits in a grey zone while regulators are still actively reviewing the rules.”
For communications teams, this means each channel needs clear guardrails. Earned media, paid media, EDMs, websites, and promotional material may all carry different risks, even when they support the same launch.
Scott explains that specialist financial services agencies need to balance campaign delivery with a higher responsibility to protect reputation. He said that responsibility extends beyond earned media.
"I know from personal experience that in Australia, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) case officers are reading what brands say - not just in earned and paid media campaigns, but below-the-line EDMs, websites and promotional material as well."
This makes consistency across the full communications ecosystem essential. A cautious media statement can be undermined by stronger claims on a website, email campaign, promotional asset, or sponsored content.
Scott identified paid editorial-style activity as one grey area for regulated brands to be aware of.
"If I were to pick an example of a grey area, it would be trade publications that, in exchange for a fee, repackage prescriptive corporate communications as earned editorial, without relevant sponsored or advertorial disclaimers. Given the rise of GEO, this has become an attractive commercial opportunity for some publishers, and my advice would be not to use this tactic for clients in heavily regulated industries."
Treat each market as its own communications environment
For multi-market launches, respondents pointed to the risk of assuming a central message will work across different jurisdictions.
"The biggest risk is assuming one message fits all markets, and only realising it doesn't after the launch," Joyce said.
Joyce cited AI as one example. In the US, she said the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is actively targeting firms making unsubstantiated claims about AI-driven portfolio management. In APAC, regulators are engaging with AI innovation within defined guardrails, including Hong Kong’s GenAI Sandbox++ and Singapore's Project MindForge.
"Managing that risk comes down to diligence, transparency, and judgement. Build the communications strategy market by market. Tier the messaging by audience and jurisdiction before anything goes out," Joyce said.
Prisita said the same risk applies across regulatory, cultural, and customer contexts.
"Misalignment at the local level, whether in terms of regulatory compliance, cultural nuance, or customer expectations, can quickly lead to reputational risk, regulatory scrutiny, or loss of consumer trust."
Local adaptation should be built into launch planning from the start. Prisita said in-market teams can bring critical insight into local sensitivities, regulatory frameworks, and audience behaviours.
Closed-group pilot campaigns can also reduce risk before a full rollout.
She explained: "These allow teams to validate messaging effectiveness, identify potential cultural or linguistic misinterpretations, and refine positioning before full-scale rollout."
Once the campaign is live, monitoring becomes just as important as preparation.
"Social listening and media tracking across markets enable communications teams to quickly identify emerging sentiment, particularly negative or misinformed narratives. This allows for timely intervention and escalation, preventing isolated issues from evolving into broader reputational challenges," Prisita said.
Know when to pause or change the approach
In regulated industries, strong communications advice sometimes means slowing a launch down, narrowing the scope, or changing the channel strategy.
According to Joyce, issues are much easier to address during planning than after launch. If risks are clear, communicators should advise clients or internal stakeholders to engage regulators early. If something goes wrong, they should address it proactively.
Agencies should also be prepared to tell clients when they are not ready.
"Sometimes the most valuable thing an agency can do is tell a client to hold off until they are comprehensively prepared, in all respects, or to push back on positioning that could expose them to regulatory risk," Joyce said.
"That's the difference between being truly strategic as a trusted advisor and a firm that just executes."
Scott said this is particularly relevant in fintech, where fast-scaling companies may face pressure to enter new markets, meet investor expectations, and deliver ambitious go-to-market plans.
"Rather than looking at media campaigns as a means for a small operation to generate interest and inbound leads, they should really separate marketing communications from corporate communications."
That distinction matters as a campaign designed to build market credibility may need a different approach from one designed to generate leads. If local governance or regulatory resources are still developing, a corporate narrative about market entry may be more appropriate than product-led promotion.
"The bottom line is that it is paramount to please regulators in new markets and establish communications that are appropriate to a brand’s level of local governance. This doesn't mean you need an enormous team - we've seen small teams execute very effective go-to-market campaigns in new markets, using expert consultants in public affairs, fractional CMOs etc."
For PR and communications teams, the goal is to help organisations launch with more precision, fewer surprises, and stronger protection for reputation, trust, and regulatory relationships. In regulated industries, the strongest communications advice shapes what is said, who it reaches, where it appears, and whether the business is ready to stand behind it.
Product and campaign launches in regulated industries
Telum Media creating connections
Get in touch to learn more
Pead launches standalone creative agency
You might also enjoy
Emma Lowde has started as Senior Communications Manager at Diraq, a Sydney-founded quantum computing company developing silicon-based technology to make quantum computers scalable, economical, and widely accessible. She joins from Intuit, where she was most recently Senior Communications Manager for the APAC region.
Emma has built up 15 years’ experience as a communications professional, including leadership roles at eBay Australia and New Zealand, following agency roles in Australia and the UK.
Every few years, someone declares the death of the media release.
Today, the arguments sound familiar. Journalists don't read them anymore. Everything is social-first. AI is replacing traditional media outreach. It's all about the pitch. Press releases are becoming little more than AI-generated filler.
And yet, when we speak with journalists across Asia Pacific and the Middle East, a different picture emerges.
Media releases aren't dead, but expectations around them have changed significantly.
We've analysed more than 10,000 Journalist Interest Survey responses in the Telum Media platform collected over the past five years, alongside insights gathered from conversations with editors, reporters, and producers across the region.
Key takeaways:
- Journalists still value useful PR content
- Relevance matters more than reach
- The pitch and the release serve different roles
- The best releases reduce friction for journalists
- Modern releases need to support multiple platforms
The conclusion is clear: journalists still value media releases, but they value them for different reasons than they once did.
The media release has evolved from a distribution tool into something far more strategic.
The media release is no longer the story
For decades, many PR professionals treated the media release as the centrepiece of media relations activity.
Write the release. Send it widely. Hope for coverage - “spray and pray”.
That approach was far from perfect, but you could get away with it in an era when newsrooms were larger, competition for attention was lower, and journalists had more time to evaluate incoming information.
Today's reality is very different.
Journalists are producing content across multiple platforms, often with smaller teams and tighter deadlines. Their inboxes are flooded with pitches, announcements, thought leadership submissions, and increasingly, AI-generated content.
As a result, journalists have become far more selective about what earns their attention.
The modern media release is no longer just about news stories. It has become a source-of-truth asset, a newsroom resource, and a content hub that supports broader communications activity.
The best PR teams understand this shift.
“The strongest message from journalists can be summarised in a single phrase: ‘Understand what I cover’. Relevance remains the most important factor in successful media engagement.”
What journalists are actually rejecting
One of the most revealing findings from our analysis is that journalists are not rejecting PR content altogether.
What they're rejecting is low-value outreach.
Across thousands of responses, the same frustrations appeared repeatedly:
- Irrelevant pitches
- Generic outreach
- Mass distribution
- Weak story angles
- Excessive follow-ups
In other words, this is less a rejection of media releases and more a rejection of poor media relations practice.
The strongest message from journalists can be summarised in a single phrase:
"Understand what I cover."
Relevance remains the most important factor in successful media engagement. In fact, our journalist surveys over the past two years have seen a sharp increase in a desire for both relevance and personalisation in pitches.
Journalists increasingly assess pitches within seconds. If the connection to their beat, audience, or current priorities isn't immediately obvious, the opportunity is often lost before the email is even opened.
The pitch and the release have different jobs
One of the biggest misconceptions in modern media relations is treating the pitch and the release as the same thing.
They are not.
The pitch exists to earn attention; the release exists to support the story.
The best pitches are:
- Brief
- Human
- Relevant
- Contextual
- Conversational
The best releases are:
- Structured
- Factual
- Complete
- Reusable
- Easy to reference
At a recent Telum Media event, a senior journalist described the fastest way to kill a pitch with a single word: “Respect”. Or a lack thereof.
A generic greeting. A story unrelated to their beat. A mass-produced email that demonstrates no understanding of their audience.
All signal a lack of respect for the journalist's time and expertise.
High-performing PR teams increasingly write pitches and releases for different audiences. The pitch is written for the journalist. The release is written for the journalist's audience.
That distinction matters.
Why journalists still value media releases
Despite predictions of their demise, journalists continue to actively request media releases.
But they want releases that help them work more efficiently.
The most common requests include concise writing, clear headlines, strong news angles, supporting data (with downloadable images and assets), spokesperson access, and easy-to-use formats.
These preferences reveal the modern role of the release: it functions as a workflow tool.
A strong release helps journalists:
- Understand the story quickly
- Verify information
- Access supporting materials
- Build content efficiently
The best releases reduce friction. And in today's newsroom environment, reducing friction is often more valuable than generating hype.
Think beyond media coverage
Another major shift is that media releases are increasingly serving multiple audiences.
A modern release doesn’t just support journalists; it might also support clients and prospects, employees, investors and analysts, partners, and search visibility.
Rather than creating a single-use document, leading communications teams are building content ecosystems.
The release becomes the foundation for:
- Media outreach
- Newsroom content
- Executive communications
- Social media content
- Email campaigns
- Sales collateral
- Thought leadership activity
This approach not only improves consistency but also increases the return on investment from every announcement.

The role of the modern media release
Not every story needs a release
Perhaps one of the most important lessons is recognising when a media release is the wrong tool.
Releases tend to perform best when there is:
- Genuine news value
- Multiple stakeholder audiences
- A need for factual consistency
- Strong supporting assets
- Broader business significance
They are often less effective for internal milestones framed as major news (or self-congratulatory announcements), generic thought leadership, and untargeted mass outreach.
In some situations, a targeted pitch, LinkedIn strategy, executive commentary programme, or direct relationship-based outreach may be more effective.
Good communications strategy isn't about defaulting to a media release; it's about choosing the right tool for the objective.
A framework for modern media releases
If there is one word that captures what journalists are asking for today, it is respect.
At Telum Media, we summarise this through the RESPECT framework:
R – Relevance
Make it relevant to the journalist, their audience and the moment.
E – Efficiency
Help journalists work faster through clear, concise, and usable content.
S – Substance
Provide genuine value through expertise, data, insight, or access.
P – Personalisation
Demonstrate that you've done your homework.
E – Ecosystem
Think beyond the release and consider how it supports broader communications goals.
C – Clarity
Make the key message immediately obvious.
T – Timing
Reach out at the right time, not simply any time.
What journalists are asking for in a pitch / media release: RESPECT
The future of the media release
The debate over whether media releases are dead misses the point.
The more useful question is how do we make releases work better in today’s media environment?
Journalists still value relevant information, credible sources, strong story angles, and efficient communication. Media releases continue to play an important role in delivering those things.
But success today depends less on the existence of the release itself and more on how strategically it is used.
The media release remains a valuable communications tool.
Just not in the way many of us were taught to use it.
FAQs
Are media releases still useful in 2026?
Yes. Journalists still value media releases, but these days want targeted outreach, relevance to their beat, alignment with their audience, and contextual pitching.
What makes a media release useful to journalists?
Journalists are looking for releases in a format that helps them work efficiently. Which means releases that are concise, factual, with a clear angle, contain usable quotes, and come with downloadable assets and supporting data.
What is the difference between a pitch and a media release?
A pitch earns the journalist’s attention in their cluttered Inbox. A media release supports the story by providing structured, factual, and reusable information relevant to their audience.
With more than 30 years’ experience spanning journalism, corporate communications and media intelligence, Reuben Aitchison is Telum Media’s Head of Insights and Communications.
Explore Telum Media tools that help PR teams pitch with precision.
PR and communications agency, Wrights, has promoted Rika Rufina to Communication Manager, strengthening the agency’s integrated communications, issues management, and Asia Pacific capabilities.
Rika will help steer corporate and consumer retainer accounts, bringing together PR, social, and creative campaigns. She will also work with Chief Executive Officer Douglas Wright and General Manager Reena Llanillo to develop and implement issues management strategies.
Rika joined Wrights in August 2025 as a Senior Communication Consultant, bringing experience from PR agencies, as well as from in-house roles across APAC, particularly in the Singapore market.
Douglas said Rika’s promotion reflected the contribution she had made to the agency and its clients.
“Rika has delivered strong results. I look forward to working closer with her and the Wrights team as we continue to deliver ingenious and impactful communications, anchored in authenticity and positive change,” he said.
“Our secret sauce is simple: ingenious thinking, brought to life by a talented and ambitious team. Rika’s promotion is another important step in strengthening our team and setting Wrights up for its next phase of growth.”
The promotion forms part of a broader period of growth for Wrights, with the agency also promoting Charlotte Dickson to Communication Consultant and will welcome Annabel Chambers as PR and Social Coordinator.
