PR News
Margaret Key

Perspectives: The modern boardroom isn’t modern at all

2026 is defined by unprecedented acceleration and innovation. Artificial intelligence dominates every conversation, sometimes to the point of fatigue. However, beyond the headlines, it is fundamentally reshaping how organisations operate and create value. Employees, customers, regulators and investors are more informed, more vocal and less patient than ever. For corporate leaders, more than ever, it is essential to be prepared, transparent and proactive.

The modern boardroom likes to think of itself as forward-looking: stakeholder-aware, digitally literate, and primed for volatility. But open the boardroom doors, and the picture is far less modern. The composition often reflects a historically defined leadership profile. Boards tend to prioritise candidates with prior board experience - CEO, CFO or legal backgrounds, and those drawn from established executive networks that remain relatively homogeneous. At the same time, boards continue to place disproportionate emphasis on operational and financial credentials, even though their greatest risks today increasingly sit elsewhere – in reputation and trust, regulatory and social scrutiny, employee engagement and culture and narrative relevance across markets.

When organisations discuss about ‘diversity in the boardroom’, the focus often defaults immediately to gender or racial quotas and representation. While important, that lens is incomplete. The real value of diversity is not meeting a metric; it is the expansion of perspective that reshapes decision-making and risk management, particularly as organisations face growing complexity and scrutiny.

Communications leaders operate across these dynamics every day, yet their experience is often labelled ‘adjacent’ rather than ‘core.’ This is the function that translates strategy into action, and action into trust. To have communications continue to sit on the periphery is misunderstanding where corporate value is both created and protected.

International Women’s Day offers more than a moment to celebrate representation. It offers a lens to examine how organisations define ‘core’ leadership. The question is not just about gender. It is about enriching perspectives and how diverse views should be treated as central to governance. When boards expand invitation and participation, the impact is measurable.

Strategic value starts with perspective
At its core, communications leadership is about seeing around corners. In a world defined by uncertainty, this skill will continue to shape who leads and who lags. Effective communicators operate at the centre of narrative, risk, and human behaviour. Their role is to design strategic outcomes, not merely deliver messages.

When communicators hold seats at the highest levels of decision-making, organisations benefit in three powerful ways:

1. Better decision-making through broader lenses
Boards that include senior communications leaders, especially women and other traditionally under-represented voices, approach risk and opportunity differently. The 5th Annual Harris X–Ragan Survey of CEOs and Communications Leaders shows that 83 per cent of leaders believe their organisation gets it right on political, economic, and social issues. Yet, 62 percent of female leaders feel their organisation does not speak up enough, while 53 percent of male counterparts are more likely to believe organisations speak up too much.

That divergence reflects different interpretations of risk, accountability, and public expectation.

With greater diversity, board discussions shift. The questions don’t just sit with what the decision is, but whom it includes, whom it impacts and how it will land.

2. More inclusive organizational outcomes
Deloitte’s research on inclusive leadership identifies measurable behaviours: curiosity, courage, cultural intelligence, cognizance of bias, collaboration and commitment. These are not abstract ideals; they have a direct impact to performance. Inclusive organisations are six times more likely to be innovative and twice as likely to meet or exceed financial targets.

When boards embrace leaders who demonstrate these behaviours, decision-making becomes more intentional, more rigorous. Inclusion, embedded early, becomes a competitive advantage rather than a reputational afterthought.

3. Reputation is risk capital
Reputation is built through behaviour, not messaging. Novo Nordisk’s response to surging global demand for its Ozempic and Wegovy products illustrates this dynamic. Social media hype, celebrity use and off-label demand created shortages that affected the key customer: diabetes patients. The company invested billions to expand manufacturing capacity, publicly prioritised supply for diabetes patients, restricted certain promotional activities and worked directly with regulators and healthcare systems to stabilise access.

Most boards still underestimate this reality: reputation is shaped not by what a company says, but by what it does, what it prioritises and what it rewards. Communications leaders understand this because they see, in real time, how organisational behaviour is translated into narrative, both internally and externally. Their actions and decisions rest on a single premise: trust takes years to build, and seconds to lose.

From boardroom tokenism to boardroom value
If the goal of diversity is to meet a quota, boards are missing the point. The real opportunity is to embed diverse communicative review at the core of strategic discussion. The focus should be:

  • Elevating senior communications leaders to board or equivalent strategic forums, not just advisory committees.
  • Leveraging communications expertise in scenario planning and risk assessment, not just crisis response.
  • Embedding communicators in early strategy formulation so organizational narratives and stakeholder impacts shape business strategy.


This is not about replacing financial or operational expertise at the board level. It is about strengthening it with perspectives that consider how decisions land across stakeholders, markets, and policy environments.

Diverse perspectives widen a board’s field of view. They sharpen risk judgment and strengthen scenario planning. In an environment where trust shifts quickly and reputation is measured in real time, that breadth of perspective is essential.

Boards that understand this will not modernise in appearance alone. They will modernise in capability and in competitive advantage.

 'Perspectives' is a Telum Media submitted article series, where diverse viewpoints spark thought-provoking conversations about the role of PR and communications in today's world. This Perspectives piece was submitted by Margaret Key, Chief Executive Officer, Allison Asia and Executive Director, Asia Pacific of Stagwell.

Margaret has more than two decades of strategic communications and leadership experience. She has led market development and client engagement across the Asia Pacific region, having held C-suite roles across organisations such as Burson-Marsteller, Zeno, and MSL.
 

Previous story

World Art Dubai 2026 names PR agency

Next story

Vault22 selects comms partner

You might also enjoy

PixVerse
Moves

PixVerse appoints Head of Global PR

Robyn Tan has been named Head of Global PR at PixVerse, an AI video generation platform. Based in Singapore, she leads PR and media relations across international markets, and serves as Chief Representative of Singapore, overseeing on-ground presence and community relations in the region. 

Sefiani
Research

Sefiani unveils new research on AI visibility ownership

Strategic communications consultancy, Sefiani, part of Clarity Global, has released a new study indicating that 84 per cent of Australian marketing and comms leaders disagree on who "owns" AI visibility, while the remaining 16 per cent take an integrated approach.

Conducted by OnePoll on behalf of Sefiani, the research surveyed 150 marketing and communications leaders at Director level and above from organisations with more than 50 employees, exploring how strategies have been adapted in response to AI search.

According to the report, 91 per cent of cross-departmental leaders are revising their strategies to influence AI-driven discovery, although an internal "turf war" is emerging over who controls brands' AI search visibility. The research found that ownership currently sits across five functions: data / analytics (23 per cent), comms / corporate affairs (20 per cent), brand (19 per cent), digital (17 per cent), and performance (16 per cent), which the agency said reflects a structurally fragmented approach within many organisations.

The "silo" challenge
To complement its findings, Sefiani collected qualitative insights from leaders through a series of executive GEO-focused sessions and a recent panel moderated by Mandy Galmes, Managing Partner at Sefiani. Speakers included Johanna Lowe, Chief Marketing and Communications Officer at the University of Sydney; Brad Pogson, Head of Communications at Lendi Group; and Tom Telford, Chief Digital Officer at Clarity Global.

Based on these discussions, several themes emerged around managing reputation in AI-driven environments:

  • Internal silos as a key barrier: Participants noted that while some leaders are encouraging cross-functional experimentation, others remain 'nihilistic' about breaking down traditional departmental walls, leading to stalled effort and wasted budgets. The panel identified the rise of AI as a 'shadow task' layered on top of existing senior role requirements without removing previous duties, which further delays progress.
  • The forever life of reputational issues: According to panellists, LLMs draw on long-term patterns across coverage, reviews, forums, and owned content, meaning historic issues may continue resurfacing in AI-generated responses. This suggests that organisations might need to take a more data-led, cross-channel approach to finding, correcting, and rebalancing inaccurate information.
  • Quality content remains critical: Insights from the discussion indicated that AI models do not discriminate by content format, but they do reward depth. The findings suggest that high-quality, thought leadership content performs better within LLM training sets, so it should be considered as central to strategies across channels moving forward.

The cost of siloed GEO: Misinformation and reputational risk
The agency stated that a lack of clear ownership over GEO is already having tangible consequences. Based on the research, AI search was cited by leaders as the most structurally siloed channel, with 77 per cent reporting problems in the last 12 months. This included a slower response to issues, conflicting messages across channels, and AI tools amplifying yesterday's problems instead of today's narratives.

The study also found that the risk is compounded by the speed at which AI-generated misinformation can spread, with 25 per cent of leaders reporting that incorrect, inconsistent, or outdated brand information has already appeared in AI answers.

"Reputation used to be managed channel by channel, but AI search has changed the rules. Because these systems read across everything - earned coverage, on-site content, social signals, and search authority - siloed marketing and communications are quietly muting your AI visibility," said Tom Telford.

"When your channels don't tell the same story, or teams are chasing independent KPIs with separate budget pots, these silos also become a major reputational liability. It is only when functions are truly connected that the models become trained on a consistent brand message and compound visibility across AI services over time. This is the crux of GEO, Generative Engine Optimisation, and done well it becomes the multiplier on everything you already invest in brand, PR and digital."

The "citations race": PR and earned media take centre stage
The report also suggested that a shift toward AI-first discovery is changing budget priorities.

According to the findings, 49 per cent of leaders have already allocated five to 10 per cent of their marketing and communications budgets to AI visibility, with 90 per cent of that spend being reallocated from traditional channels like paid digital and brand. A further 30 per cent reported allocating up to 20 per cent of their budgets.

Citing external analysis from Gartner, the agency noted that the majority of sources referenced by AI systems are non-paid, which the report argues increases the strategic importance of PR and earned media in AI-driven discovery.

Mandy Galmes said: "When LLMs answer a question in your category, they’re drawing overwhelmingly on non-paid, third party sources. If your spokespeople, experts, case studies and proof points aren’t in those sources, you’re invisible at a key moment in the buyer journey." 

Royal
Moves

Royal Plaza on Scotts names marcomms director

Irwin Lim has been appointed Director of Marketing Communications at Royal Plaza on Scotts. In this role, he oversees brand, communications, content, campaigns, media relations, and marketing initiatives across the hotel’s key business areas.

Most recently, Irwin was Director of Marketing at Pan Pacific Orchard, Singapore.