PR News
<span id="hs_cos_wrapper_name" class="hs_cos_wrapper hs_cos_wrapper_meta_field hs_cos_wrapper_type_text" style="" data-hs-cos-general-type="meta_field" data-hs-cos-type="text" >Perspectives: Communicating sustainability: Building trust via transparent, meaningful reporting</span>

Perspectives: Communicating sustainability: Building trust via transparent, meaningful reporting

'Perspectives' is a Telum Media submitted article series, where diverse viewpoints spark thought-provoking conversations about the role of PR and communications in today's world. This Perspectives piece was submitted by Andy See, Founder & Managing Director of Perspective Strategies.

Trust is no longer built through media relations, shareholder meetings or marketing initiatives alone. It is important to recognise that genuine credibility is not achieved in a linear route. It is the result of a multi-dimensional approach that weaves together transparent reporting, consistent stakeholder engagement and a demonstrated commitment to action.

Building trust requires telling your story as well as showing how values are embedded across every level of your organisation. Brands and businesses are now expected to communicate a clear purpose (their 'why') and to involve stakeholders in that journey. This shift demands an authentic, purpose-driven narrative that wins the people's hearts and minds.

Purpose is the new product
Simon Sinek's Golden Circle reminds us that true loyalty begins with this 'why.' Organisations that communicate their purpose are more likely to win in the marketplace in the long term. In fact, purpose is the new product. Sustainability, now a key expectation from Boards, is measured and communicated through ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) indicators. These indicators serve as our tool to demonstrate how we deliver on our purpose with transparency, consistency and real-world impact.

It is no surprise that sustainability has become the new profitability in Boardroom deliberations. The financial community is already using ESG indicators to evaluate long-term value and business resilience. Communicating purpose through the lens of ESG does not just elevate your brand but it also strengthens your license to operate.

Rethinking sustainability communication: From indicators to impact
Sustainability communication is a holistic approach. It spans campaigns, partnerships, stakeholder engagements and digital platforms. But one pillar stands out for its role in ensuring credibility: sustainability reporting. A transparent report turns ESG from an ideal into measurable action. It creates accountability, signals progress and helps stakeholders see how purpose is being translated into outcomes.

But here is the question I often get from clients: What does 'good' sustainability reporting look like in this part of the world? In Southeast Asia, the rules are evolving, and expectations are still taking shape.

To help answer that, we partnered with the Global ESG Monitor (GEM) in 2023 to assess the transparency of sustainability reports by Malaysian companies on the FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI (FBMKLCI). We benchmarked them against indices such as the S&P 50 (USA), Hang Seng (Hong Kong) and EUROSTOXX (European Union).

How well is Malaysia doing?
Malaysia's performance landed us squarely in the midfield. A solid start but the data also revealed hard truths. While many local companies align with global frameworks, there is still room to improve in terms of clarity, depth and narrative quality, especially for non-financial metrics.

We found that most reports included the right categories. Companies declared their sustainability goals, followed accepted frameworks and disclosed ESG data. But the depth was inconsistent. Many companies focused on what they had done or planned to do yet remained vague about the how, when and why.

For instance, 67 per cent of companies listed their stakeholders, but only 37 per cent explained how they were identified. Additionally, 90 per cent reported conducting a materiality analysis, but only 20 per cent disclosed when or how the data was collected.

Setting the stage for trustworthy reporting
This reveals a crucial opportunity to elevate sustainability reporting from compliance to meaningful engagement. And that begins with letting go of a few common myths:

Myth 1: Sustainability reporting is about setting goals to save the planet

Reality: It is about managing and measuring your organisation's impact across people, planet and profit, and communicating your purpose.

To do this well, sustainability must become a lens through which all departments operate, from finance to procurement to operations. That scrutiny may uncover both risks and untapped strengths.

Tip: Sustainability communication must be championed at the leadership level. If sustainability is not embedded in decision-making, reporting becomes a box-ticking exercise, not a transformation tool.

Myth 2: Sustainability reporting is a once-a-year showcase

Reality: It is an ongoing progress tracker.

Many organisations fear disclosing unmet targets. But in reality, stakeholders value honesty over perfection. Investors and partners know sustainability is a journey. What matters is transparency and a commitment to improve.

Tip: Communicate consistently and be forward-looking. Do not just report the wins but share plans to achieve unmet goals.

Myth 3: We can fully outsource sustainability reporting

Reality: External expertise is useful to guide the team, but authenticity and meaningful impact comes from within.

Bring in consultants for frameworks, design, reporting and sharpening the message. But the real value lies in the internal conversations that spark the process of sustainable transformation.A A

In one engagement, we supported a client's first impact report. During field interviews with external stakeholders smallholders, in this case one suggestion emerged: hold regular town halls for open dialogue. That simple request led to wider conversations about stakeholder engagement and even encouraged conversations about the company's operating model.

Tip: Think of sustainability reporting as an ongoing, constructive dialogue. In Southeast Asia, where regulatory structures are still developing, culture and trust often matter as much as compliance.A

Beyond the ESG checklist
Sustainability reporting in Malaysia, and sustainability communication as a whole, is still finding its footing. But transparency is critical if we are to build trust and catalyse change. While there are hurdles including limited data, shifting expectations and uneven disclosures, we are moving in the right direction.

What we need now is a mindset shift from viewing sustainability reporting as a compliance obligation to embracing it as a strategic growth tool.

Andy See is the Founder and Managing Director of Perspective Strategies. He is also the immediate past president of the Public Relations Global Network (PRGN) and a former president of the Public Relations & Communications Association of Malaysia (PRCA Malaysia). Andy is a public relations professional with more than 25 years of experience, specialising in strategic communications, stakeholder engagement and issues management.
Previous story

Pamela Pung makes the move to insurance company

Next story

LUNA PR welcomes former journalist

You might also enjoy

Are
Feature

Are media releases dead? What 10,000 journalists told us they want from PR Teams in 2026

Every few years, someone declares the death of the media release.

Today, the arguments sound familiar. Journalists don't read them anymore. Everything is social-first. AI is replacing traditional media outreach. It's all about the pitch. Press releases are becoming little more than AI-generated filler.

And yet, when we speak with journalists across Asia Pacific and the Middle East, a different picture emerges.

Media releases aren't dead, but expectations around them have changed significantly.

We've analysed more than 10,000 Journalist Interest Survey responses in the Telum Media platform collected over the past five years, alongside insights gathered from conversations with editors, reporters, and producers across the region.

Key takeaways:

  1. Journalists still value useful PR content
  2. Relevance matters more than reach
  3. The pitch and the release serve different roles
  4. The best releases reduce friction for journalists
  5. Modern releases need to support multiple platforms

The conclusion is clear: journalists still value media releases, but they value them for different reasons than they once did.

The media release has evolved from a distribution tool into something far more strategic.

The media release is no longer the story

For decades, many PR professionals treated the media release as the centrepiece of media relations activity.

Write the release. Send it widely. Hope for coverage - “spray and pray”.

That approach was far from perfect, but you could get away with it in an era when newsrooms were larger, competition for attention was lower, and journalists had more time to evaluate incoming information.

Today's reality is very different.

Journalists are producing content across multiple platforms, often with smaller teams and tighter deadlines. Their inboxes are flooded with pitches, announcements, thought leadership submissions, and increasingly, AI-generated content.

As a result, journalists have become far more selective about what earns their attention.

The modern media release is no longer just about news stories. It has become a source-of-truth asset, a newsroom resource, and a content hub that supports broader communications activity.

The best PR teams understand this shift.

“The strongest message from journalists can be summarised in a single phrase: ‘Understand what I cover’. Relevance remains the most important factor in successful media engagement.”

What journalists are actually rejecting

One of the most revealing findings from our analysis is that journalists are not rejecting PR content altogether.

What they're rejecting is low-value outreach.

Across thousands of responses, the same frustrations appeared repeatedly:

    • Irrelevant pitches
    • Generic outreach
    • Mass distribution
    • Weak story angles
    • Excessive follow-ups

In other words, this is less a rejection of media releases and more a rejection of poor media relations practice.

The strongest message from journalists can be summarised in a single phrase:

"Understand what I cover."

Relevance remains the most important factor in successful media engagement. In fact, our journalist surveys over the past two years have seen a sharp increase in a desire for both relevance and personalisation in pitches.

Journalists increasingly assess pitches within seconds. If the connection to their beat, audience, or current priorities isn't immediately obvious, the opportunity is often lost before the email is even opened.

The pitch and the release have different jobs

One of the biggest misconceptions in modern media relations is treating the pitch and the release as the same thing.

They are not.

The pitch exists to earn attention; the release exists to support the story.

The best pitches are:

    • Brief
    • Human
    • Relevant
    • Contextual
    • Conversational

The best releases are:

    • Structured
    • Factual
    • Complete
    • Reusable
    • Easy to reference

At a recent Telum Media event, a senior journalist described the fastest way to kill a pitch with a single word: “Respect”. Or a lack thereof.

A generic greeting. A story unrelated to their beat. A mass-produced email that demonstrates no understanding of their audience.

All signal a lack of respect for the journalist's time and expertise.

High-performing PR teams increasingly write pitches and releases for different audiences. The pitch is written for the journalist. The release is written for the journalist's audience.

That distinction matters.

Why journalists still value media releases

Despite predictions of their demise, journalists continue to actively request media releases.

But they want releases that help them work more efficiently.

The most common requests include concise writing, clear headlines, strong news angles, supporting data (with downloadable images and assets), spokesperson access, and easy-to-use formats.

These preferences reveal the modern role of the release: it functions as a workflow tool.

A strong release helps journalists:

    • Understand the story quickly
    • Verify information
    • Access supporting materials
    • Build content efficiently

The best releases reduce friction. And in today's newsroom environment, reducing friction is often more valuable than generating hype.

Think beyond media coverage

Another major shift is that media releases are increasingly serving multiple audiences.

A modern release doesn’t just support journalists; it might also support clients and prospects, employees, investors and analysts, partners, and search visibility.

Rather than creating a single-use document, leading communications teams are building content ecosystems.

The release becomes the foundation for:

    • Media outreach
    • Newsroom content
    • Executive communications
    • Social media content
    • Email campaigns
    • Sales collateral
    • Thought leadership activity

This approach not only improves consistency but also increases the return on investment from every announcement.

Media Releases - Releases today

The role of the modern media release

 

Not every story needs a release

Perhaps one of the most important lessons is recognising when a media release is the wrong tool.

Releases tend to perform best when there is:

    • Genuine news value
    • Multiple stakeholder audiences
    • A need for factual consistency
    • Strong supporting assets
    • Broader business significance

They are often less effective for internal milestones framed as major news (or self-congratulatory announcements), generic thought leadership, and untargeted mass outreach.

In some situations, a targeted pitch, LinkedIn strategy, executive commentary programme, or direct relationship-based outreach may be more effective.

Good communications strategy isn't about defaulting to a media release; it's about choosing the right tool for the objective.

A framework for modern media releases

If there is one word that captures what journalists are asking for today, it is respect.

At Telum Media, we summarise this through the RESPECT framework:

R – Relevance
Make it relevant to the journalist, their audience and the moment.

E – Efficiency
Help journalists work faster through clear, concise, and usable content.

S – Substance
Provide genuine value through expertise, data, insight, or access.

P – Personalisation
Demonstrate that you've done your homework.

E – Ecosystem
Think beyond the release and consider how it supports broader communications goals.

C – Clarity
Make the key message immediately obvious.

T – Timing
Reach out at the right time, not simply any time.

Media Releases - RESPECT

What journalists are asking for in a pitch / media release: RESPECT

 

The future of the media release

The debate over whether media releases are dead misses the point.

The more useful question is how do we make releases work better in today’s media environment?

Journalists still value relevant information, credible sources, strong story angles, and efficient communication. Media releases continue to play an important role in delivering those things.

But success today depends less on the existence of the release itself and more on how strategically it is used.

The media release remains a valuable communications tool.

Just not in the way many of us were taught to use it.

 

FAQs

Are media releases still useful in 2026?

Yes. Journalists still value media releases, but these days want targeted outreach, relevance to their beat, alignment with their audience, and contextual pitching.

What makes a media release useful to journalists?

Journalists are looking for releases in a format that helps them work efficiently. Which means releases that are concise, factual, with a clear angle, contain usable quotes, and come with downloadable assets and supporting data.

What is the difference between a pitch and a media release?

A pitch earns the journalist’s attention in their cluttered Inbox. A media release supports the story by providing structured, factual, and reusable information relevant to their audience.

 

With more than 30 years’ experience spanning journalism, corporate communications and media intelligence, Reuben Aitchison is Telum Media’s Head of Insights and Communications.

Explore Telum Media tools that help PR teams pitch with precision. 

The
The Earned View

The debt we owe to the next generation

In 2022, when we returned to the office after Melbourne's two years of lockdown, it was the silence that surprised me most. Not because the people weren't there, but because the juniors we'd hired and the ones we promoted during the pandemic were listening intently, absorbing everything around them.

As artificial intelligence reshapes the way our industry works, what I hear from colleagues and witness in my own agency is that our offices are falling silent again. Only this time it is not because the juniors aren't listening. It is because fewer of them are making it through the front door.

This is not an accident. It is a rational response to the changed economics of expertise.

A rational choice with a hidden cost

When I founded Stake 18 months ago, I made a deliberate structural choice: hire seniors and leverage AI as much as we reasonably can. Clients pay for judgment, and judgment is what senior practitioners carry. In a world where AI can produce a competent first draft in seconds, the most defensible thing a firm like ours can offer is the capacity to know what to do when the situation has no precedent and the stakes are real.

It was a sound business decision. It was also, I have come to realise, a decision that removes me from the pipeline from which I have benefited for 25 years.

Across my career, I have absorbed tacit knowledge from senior people who never had to teach it explicitly, because proximity did the work. I sat near people making hard calls. I watched them manage a crisis with no playbook, read a room wrong and recover, and hold a line under pressure when the easier path was to fold. Whatever the work was that put me in those rooms, it was never really the point. The rooms were the point. And I was allowed to be in them.

And here is what troubles me about that. The market is now actively rewarding firms for making exactly this choice. Not through malice, but through logic.

AI reduces the economic case for hiring at the base. A senior led, AI supported model is not just a positioning line, it is where the incentives point. Which means the mechanisms through which future expertise develops are being quietly dismantled, not by careless firms, but by careful ones.

The question nobody has answered

Last year, I had the opportunity to ask a chief technology officer of one of the world's most valuable technology companies how they were approaching this challenge as an employer. How do you develop judgment in people who may never have to spend a day doing the grinding work that judgment used to be built through? They didn't have an answer.

If the organisations building this technology haven't solved it, the communications industry's failure to reckon with it looks less like negligence and more like a shared blind spot. AI removes the need for the ticket. But the room still exists, and judgment still needs to transfer somehow.

 

The lost habit of learning by being there

The traditional apprenticeship in our profession was never formally designed. It worked because volume created proximity, and proximity created osmosis. Junior practitioners wrote the releases nobody used, compiled the media lists, and sat in on the client calls they weren't expected to contribute to.

In doing so, they absorbed, slowly and imperfectly, the thing that no brief can teach: how a senior mind moves through an ambiguous situation and arrives at a defensible position.

That system is now quietly breaking down, and nobody is building a replacement. The apprenticeship pipeline is not collapsing because anyone decided it should. It is collapsing because increasingly it doesn't make sense to pay for it anymore. And for the time being, the people who will feel that most acutely are not the firms making the rational choice. They are the future practitioners who never get to be in the room.

Making judgement visible

So, what do we owe the generation ahead of us?

Two things, I think. The first is deliberate proximity. Senior practitioners need to stop assuming osmosis will do the work and start narrating their judgement out loud. Invite the junior into the client call not to contribute but to watch. Debrief out loud after the hard conversation. Say the thing you would previously have just done.

The second is counterintuitive: use AI as the mechanism, not the replacement. Let AI generate the options. Require the junior to choose and defend and then interrogate that defence. The judgment transfer happens in the interrogation, which is closer to how good legal and medical training works than anything our industry has ever formally done. AI, used with intention, can become the forcing function for the kind of explicit, reasoned, defensible thinking we were always trying to develop but never had a reliable way to teach.

For two years our profession has been consumed by anxiety about what AI means for our own careers. That is a reasonable response to an unreasonable rate of change. The harder question, and the one we have been slower to ask, is what it means for the people coming after us.

While the future remains unclear, we can at least be deliberate about handing on what we were given.

Matthew (Matt) Thomas is Founder and Chief Catalyst at Stake The Reputation Company, a Melbourne-based consultancy working across brand, reputation, communications, and public affairs. He has advised some of Australia’s largest private companies and has worked extensively with global organisations localising their storytelling and narratives for Australian audiences. His experience spans consumer, government, health, infrastructure, technology, and corporate reputation, including advisory work at all levels of government in Australia.

Matt’s work sits at the intersection of communications, behaviour change, and institutional strategy. He is also a contributor to the The Oxford Handbook of Social Purpose, writing on reputation, legitimacy, and the growing gap between organisational messaging and operational reality.

Endowus
Moves

Endowus welcomes back a familiar face

Grace Chiang has returned to Endowus as Vice President Communications, joining the digital wealth firm's leadership team.

Based in Singapore, she oversees investment and corporate communications, executive and employer branding, corporate social responsibility and internal communications.

Grace first joined Endowus as Head of PR and Communications in 2021, before moving to Xora, a Temasek-backed deep tech venture firm as Head of Marketing and Communications.