PR News
Patricia Malay

Growing talent in a region, not just a role

She was in tears. I'd sent my account director at the time into her first regional call. A global lead asked her a question she didn't have the answer to. She froze, stammered, reached for her notes. Before she could find the answer, someone from another market responded for her.

I still remember it clearly, years later. It was dramatic, yes. But also avoidable.

For a long time I told that story as a warning. Look what happens when you send someone in unprepared. But the more I've thought about it, the less I see a story about what she lacked. What I see now is everything she already had that nobody told her she could use.

What actually transfers

I wish more people knew this: most of what regional work asks for, a good local communicator already owns.

The foundations of PR and comms don't change at the regional level. Message discipline is message discipline. Knowing how to structure a crisis statement or brief a spokesperson under pressure is the same skill, whether you're doing it for one market or for five country leads on the same call. Nobody has to relearn how to write a good release because the audience got bigger.

Neither do the foundations of interpersonal relationships. A good account director already knows how to read a room, and how to tell when a client is nodding but not agreeing. She knows when to push and when to let something sit. Regional work asks for that muscle more often and in front of more people. It doesn't ask for a different version of it.

My account director had all of this. She'd handled harder client conversations than the one that broke her that day. What she didn't have was the belief that any of it counted in that room.

Where it actually changes

The part that's genuinely different is the layer sitting on top of those foundations.

Cultural nuance. What reads as direct and efficient in one market reads as abrupt in another. A statement that lands as confident in Singapore can come across as tone-deaf in Jakarta. The message is the same. The register is what shifts.

The local media landscape. Who the gatekeepers are. Which outlets actually move public opinion and which ones just make noise. How fast a story travels, and through which channel, changes from market to market too. That knowledge is earned one market at a time. You cannot import it.

The geopolitical context underneath all of it. A message that's neutral in one country can be politically loaded in the next, for reasons that have nothing to do with the client and everything to do with history the communicator wasn't around for.

And the channels themselves. What's read on WhatsApp in one market gets read on LINE in another, and barely registers on either in a third. This is more an issue of fluency than foundations, and fluency takes time and exposure that a title alone doesn't grant.

This is the layer that should genuinely humble someone stepping into a regional brief. Not the fundamentals. The specifics.

 

Why the distinction matters

Conflating the two is what makes regional work feel so much bigger than it is. If you think you need an entirely new skill set, the jump feels enormous, and it's easy to freeze the way my account director did. If you understand that your foundations already travel, the genuinely new work becomes specific. And specific is a lot less frightening.

Regional isn't a bigger mountain than people think. Most of it is one you've already climbed. The unfamiliar part is a narrower band near the top, and it's learnable the way everything else in this industry gets learned: by doing the work, and by having someone tell you plainly where your read was off.

What I'd tell her now

I sat with my account director after that call. We talked through what she could have said instead. The moment was already gone. The point was to make the next one different so she doesn’t beat herself up over it.

What I did wish I'd said to her before she ever walked into that room was simpler than any of the prep we did afterwards. You already know how to do this job. Just because they seem more important does not mean they are. By being in that room, your value is yours to lose.

It's a reminder for leaders, it's also on us to set our juniors up for success.

To anyone who thinks local is the smaller field

If you're handling one market and it feels like a narrower field than the regional seat you're eyeing, don't underestimate what you're building right now.

Get good at the local work. Really good. Learn the market so well you could brief someone else on it without notes. Build the kind of client trust that holds even when you're the one delivering bad news. Fluency in your own patch is what turns the fundamentals from effort into instinct.

That isn't the smaller job. Regional gets built on top of it. And when your own moment comes, the question you don't have a ready answer to in a room full of people watching, the local mastery you put in now is what makes that moment lighter than it was for her.

Not painless. Lighter. That's the whole return on getting really good where you already are.

Patricia Malay is General Manager of Bud Communications, an independent PR and content agency operating across Asia Pacific, and founder of Candour Leads, an advisory practice for leaders navigating transitions and organisational change.

With over 20 years of experience across agency and in-house roles - including positions at FleishmanHillard, Havas, Burson, and Ogilvy - she has built a reputation for exploring the human dimensions of communications work: how talent develops, how leaders communicate honestly, and how organisations build cultures where capable people choose to stay and grow. Patricia is based in Singapore and writes regularly on AI's impact on communications careers, regional talent development, and the gap between what leaders know and what they say.

Read more from our columnists in The Earned View

Previous story

Joseph Khong expands role at multinational pharma company

You might also enjoy

Joseph
Moves

Joseph Khong expands role at multinational pharma company

Joseph Khong has taken on a new responsibility at MSD to help establish the communications and engagement function in Saudi Arabia, in addition to his primary role as the comms head in Singapore. His new responsibilities will also include supporting major comms priorities for the company in Saudi Arabia, helping design and execute MSD KSA’s presence at key local and regional events, strengthening comms processes and frameworks, and coordinating with global comms leadership.

Joseph has been with the company since 2023, working closely with colleagues in Asia Pacific, and will now also work closely with the MSD KSA team. Prior to this, he has worked at Action Community for Entrepreneurship, the Singapore Ministry of Trade and Industry, the Singapore Ministry of Communications and Information, and Mediacorp.

The
The Earned View

The number we all know is fake, but still put in the report

Somewhere in the GCC region, this month, a communications team is presenting results to a client. Slide after slide of coverage, and then the figure everyone has been waiting for: the AVE, or Advertising Value Equivalent.

A big number with a currency sign in front of it, built by measuring the space a story took up and pricing it as if the brand had bought an ad in exactly that spot. The client nods. The team exhales. And everyone in the room, if they are honest with themselves, knows the number is invented.

Why AVE still gets applause

I write this as someone whose agency has spent years winning AMEC awards, the global benchmark for measurement done properly. So this is not a note from the cheap seats. It is the opposite. I’ve grown tired of watching an industry I love keep score with a metric the rest of the world has already retired.

Here is the uncomfortable timeline. In 2010, AMEC, the global body for communications measurement, published the Barcelona Principles. The very first thing they said was to stop using AVEs. Not soften them. Stop.

That was fifteen years ago. The Principles have been revised three times since, most recently to version 4.0 in June 2025, and every single edition has had to repeat the same line, because we still have not listened.

Principle five, today, reads plainly: invalid measures like AVEs should not be used, measure outcome and impact instead. The fact that it still needs saying is the whole problem.

The habit that flatters everyone

So why does the Gulf, a region that genuinely wants to lead global communications, cling hardest to the one thing global communications agreed to bury?

Part of it is how we buy and sell the work. When agencies compete mostly on price and volume, a fat AVE is the easiest way to look like value for money. So we hand it over.

Part of it is training. A marketing director who has seen an AVE in every report for a decade will ask where it has gone the moment it disappears, and its absence feels like you are hiding something.

And part of it, the part nobody says out loud, is that the number flatters everyone in the room at once.

The agency looks effective. The manager looks justified in the spend. The client looks smart to their board. A metric that makes four people happy is very hard to kill, even when all four privately suspect it is nonsense.

Some teams still multiply the figure by three or five for "PR credibility," inventing value on top of invented value, and we all keep straight faces.

 

Agencies need to own their role

I want to be fair about where the fault sits, which means being unfair to my own side.

Agencies are complicit. We keep AVEs because they win pitches and pad reports, and then we blame the client for wanting them. We taught the client to want them. If we are serious about measurement in this region, that is where the honesty has to start, at our own end of the table.

Moving away from AVE

None of this is hard to fix. It is just uncomfortable, and comfort is what has kept the number alive.

Here is what it actually takes to move a client off it:

1. Start before the campaign, not after

Agree what the work is for while you can still shape it. Version 4.0 calls these SMARTER objectives, but strip the acronym away and it is four questions:

  • What should change

  • For whom

  • By when

  • How will we know

If nobody in the room can answer those, no metric invented afterwards will save the report. Most AVEs exist precisely because that conversation never happened.

2. Replace, do not just remove

You cannot take away a client's comfort number and hand them a lecture in its place. Give them something better to hold: whether your actual messages pulled through, your share of positive coverage among the audiences you were trying to reach, movement in perception, actions people took.

Outcomes, not centimetres of print.

3. Prove it small

Pick one campaign and measure it properly alongside the old way, just once. Show the client where the AVE said one thing, and the outcomes said another. You will almost always find a piece of coverage that scored huge on AVE and did nothing, and a quiet placement that moved the needle.

Let that gap make your argument for you. It is far more persuasive than anything you can say.

4. Name the trade honestly

Measuring properly costs time, and sometimes money. Say so. A client who understands they are paying for the truth instead of flattery will usually choose the truth, but only if you actually give them the choice. Most have never been offered it.

The region has the ambition, that has never been in doubt. We host some of the biggest campaigns in the world and we want to be judged among the best who do this work. You cannot claim that seat while reporting on a metric the rest of the profession threw out in 2010.

Winning awards taught me something simple and slightly deflating: the agencies that measure honestly are the ones that get braver over time, because they can finally see what works and what only looked like it did. The number that flatters you is the number that keeps you from getting better.

It is long past time we put it down.

Kate Midttun is Founder and Managing Director of Acorn Strategy, an Abu Dhabi-headquartered integrated communications consultancy with offices across the UAE, Australia, and the UK. Founded in 2010, Acorn has grown into a multi-award-winning firm serving sovereign wealth entities, energy giants, tech disruptors, and cultural institutions across the Middle East and beyond.

With over two decades advising multinationals and public sector organisations, Kate specialises in reputation, stakeholder trust, transformation communications, and AI integration. Acorn Strategy was named Independent Agency of the Year at the Australian Marketing Institute Awards in 2024, and Large Agency of the Year at the Middle East PR Association Awards in 2021. Kate serves as Governor of Future Communicators Foundation and Board Member of The Marketing Society.

Read more from our columnists in The Earned View 

AMPR
Industry update

AMPR strengthens its architecture, design, and placemaking portfolio

PR agency, AMPR, has been appointed by international architecture and design practice, Plus Studio.

AMPR will lead strategic communications, media relations, brand partnerships and events, with a focus on raising Plus Studio’s national profile, strengthening thought leadership across architecture, urban design and placemaking, and engaging industry, media and cultural audiences.

Managing Director of AMPR, Jannah Flockhart, said: "Plus Studio represents the calibre of practice we are passionate about partnering with. Their philosophy of balancing bold creative thinking with buildable outcomes strongly aligns with AMPR’s strategic approach to communications.

“As AMPR continues to expand our expertise across architecture, design, property and placemaking, we’re excited to work alongside the Plus Studio team to tell the stories behind the projects, people and ideas shaping future cities and communities."