How will the relationship between public relations and artificial intelligence play out in 2026? In 2025, we saw the potential of earned and owned in the future of large language model-driven search.
As we head into 2026, with AI search and Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO) on top of mind, Telum Media spoke with Matt Collette, CEO and Founder of Sequencr AI, to hear about what this future of PR holds and more importantly, how industry professionals can best prepare for the journey ahead.
GEO has emerged as the latest frontier in PR. What does it mean to create for large language models and optimise for GEO?
What’s changed is how differently the average person can now manipulate search results as compared to before. To understand GEO, communicators must first understand the changes in search.
Search used to be basic. Google “pet food” with a few keywords, and product images and links would pop up, along with search engine optimised results. You’d go through a journey of opening the links, consuming that content, and synthesising the information.
With AI search, you can end up with results from 10 different websites at once, the information already synthesised by the LLM and returned as digestible information.
The kinds of questions people ask have also changed dramatically. A 2024 study found that 70 per cent of ChatGPT search queries were completely unique. Users are also not only asking very different questions but query stacking as well. Moreover, AI models now serve as filters that suggest next courses of action.
We’ve gone from a world where we key in a search, get a variety of results, and go through the information journey, to having AI synthesising those results and guiding the search journey.
In this reality, companies and communicators need to start considering: how have queries changed? How are they being stacked? How will they evolve? What are people asking about your company? What owned or earned content will prompt LLMs to trust, retrieve, and provide to their users? Search is no longer static, because the ways people are searching have changed dramatically.
As AI search continues to shape corporate reputation, managing GEO means managing the way that people think about your company.
When it comes to PR in the age of GEO, it's more than uploading a press release. How do storytelling, reputation, and thought leadership shape GEO’s performance and strengthen brand visibility in AI-driven search?
There’s a lot of debate inside companies: who owns GEO? Marketing? The search engine team? Or is it comms?
The answer is all. Different models surface different issues, and different teams have responsibility for the different types of content and communication. Generally, what LLMs say about you is almost a representative sample of what the Internet thinks about you, and PR is essential in shaping this.
To get a sense of what models are currently surfacing about their company, communicators should conduct an audit and use that to inform their strategies, pitches, and media engagement, especially with publications that have authority within AI search.
In addition to earned and news, owned content is an important source for generative AI, which comms teams are also responsible for shaping. Comms will need to review dated blog entries and old corporate newsrooms and whether such information should be crawled by LLMs.
Another way to strengthen brand visibility is something that communications already does on a day-to-day basis. What LLMs love about earned and owned content is communications’ logical way of writing. Take a press release as example: the key news in the first paragraph, followed by a funnel of information. LLMs - and the way that they learn - prefer this structured approach.
In this new world, comms leaders will need to constantly consider how information is being discovered, how corporate reputation is being evaluated, and how purchase decisions are being made.
What factors go into how AI-led search perceives brand reputation and trust?
Different factors go into which sources end up being referenced. Communicators need to consider what might affect the questions asked about your organisation, especially those queried most.
For example, people turn to AI search before making B2B purchases. The LLM will quickly surface and synthesise both positive and negative details about a provider, including partnerships and product quality.
Another factor is the model you’re optimising for. Each has rules on what’s considered authoritative content. ChatGPT sometimes references Reddit; Gemini will reference social media content - specifically YouTube, X, and Instagram. Of course, reviews across websites have impact as well.
Generative AI is non-deterministic, and one query is not always representative. With the same prompt, you’re going to get a different response each time - different series of words, combinations of facts, and sites surfaced.
Are there ways to measure AI share of voice and monitor brand health effectively? For teams adapting to GEO, what steps can they take?
The best thing is to get an audit to see how your organisation is represented. Then, you can plan a GEO-informed comms strategy to address the findings.
Each model has a different way of presenting positive or negative information. Sometimes, Gemini is more negative than ChatGPT or vice versa, depending on the question and company. Setting up dashboards can help with monitoring reach, visibility, and sentiment across different LLMs.
Another thing is to revisit your website’s structure. Schema markups make a big difference in how LLMs surf and identify information on a webpage. Even technical tweaks to facilitate information retrieval and machine readability can improve how models represent information about your company or products.
As GEO continues to evolve, what's a suggestion you have for communicators concerned about the ethics or perception of AI usage in PR?
One issue that might arise is one of copyright infringement. There are ongoing cases looking into whether companies might have violated or circumvented them as part of training their models.
For communicators, it’s always good to keep in mind how you’re prompting models. That’s where the ethical lines start to come into play: is there intent to violate copyright when you are prompting? Or is the intent to create original content based on what’s been released by your company?
As practical guidance, write prompts that don’t infringe copyright and steer away from the ethical challenges that others have already gone through.
How would you suggest agencies and in-house teams go about implementing, or even just considering, AI programs to get a head start in 2026?
To start, the corporate policy environment is very important.
Back in 2022, many companies had knee-jerk reactions to generative AI. Policies tended to be restrictive and negative - “don’t use ChatGPT at work” or “it’s going to produce outputs that may infringe copyright.” These policies have had negative outcomes, with employees feeling uncomfortable discussing or sharing how they use AI at work and feeling undervalued if they do.
But there are various AI policies that you can write, ones that are functional, strategic, and in part, mission statements. For example, there are some very compelling ones from organisations concerned about the environmental impact of generative AI and how to manage that. Through constructive AI policies, you can incentivise value-aligned behaviours so that increasingly, you become an AI-native organisation.
Proficiency is another big issue. Statistics show that 70 per cent of generative AI users are novices, and only 10 per cent of all users are considered proficient. So, training remains an important area. I’ve seen many companies have an expectation that people will use AI more, without investing in helping people understand how to do so.
Most people think that generative AI is best used to produce content: “help me write an email,” “help me write a blog post.” But generative AI goes beyond that. For example, with simulation and prediction, you can run messaging by it to see potential audience reacts.
If there’s one thing I would recommend, it’s to understand the technology so that you can see the full spectrum of possibilities with it, because it is quite exciting when you start to apply it to these different things.
After generative AI, you can move onto the implications of agentic AI. Most people, when talking about Generative Engine Optimisation, stop at ChatGPT. But beyond that, there’s a world of agentic processes where models can execute tasks for users, and it will have a big impact on the information economy and search.
This is the world that we’re heading into, and that’s where comms leaders need to think towards: how different the world will become and prepare for that, versus how the world currently is and reacting to the present. As an industry, we need to become more future-oriented.
Hear more from Matt Collette in Telum Media's upcoming webinar (5th February) looking at the Top AI tools for 2026. Register for free here.
Year Ahead: Mapping the GEO journey in 2026
Telum Media creating connections
Get in touch to learn more
Interview: Ashleigh Bonica from AMPR
You might also enjoy
The Australian Open returns to Melbourne as one of 2026's first major global sporting events. More than just a tournament, the event has evolved into a cultural moment, where sport, fashion, entertainment, and lifestyle collide. Such events also create a highly competitive environment for brands, where standing out requires authentic and credible engagement.
To explore authentic, meaningful brand presence during major sporting moments, Telum Media spoke with Ashleigh Bonica, Senior Communications Director at AMPR. Drawing on her client work in this space, she discussed building deeper brand connections, earning attention beyond traditional sponsorship models, and adapting brand storytelling for diverse audiences without losing sight of a clear, consistent narrative.
Many brands want to tap into the hype of major sporting events even when they have no natural link to the sport. How do you help clients find an authentic point of relevance and avoid campaigns that feel forced or disconnected from the moment?
Authenticity starts with heritage, not hype. For example, with Lacoste and tennis, the connection is genuine - tennis isn't a borrowed platform for Lacoste, it's the foundation the brand was built on.
Our role is to ensure that the brand's values are expressed in a way that feels contemporary, culturally connected, and relevant to how audiences experience the Australian Open today. Rather than defaulting to logos or nostalgic storytelling, we look at how Lacoste's enduring values of elegance under pressure, performance with style, and confidence in movement, can come to life in a modern, experiential way.
Le Club Lacoste Melbourne at AFLOAT is a strong example of this approach. It doesn't interrupt the Australian Open experience; it extends it. It creates a space that mirrors how people actually engage with the tournament, before and after matches, socially with friends, or by the water, while staying rooted in tennis culture.
Relevance is only the first hurdle. How can PR and comms professionals carve out distinctive brand spaces - especially when up against official sponsors and major rights holders?
In a sponsorship-heavy environment, visibility alone is not the goal - meaningful connection is. Consumers are increasingly adept at tuning out brand noise, particularly during major sporting moments saturated with logos and competing messages.
PR and comms professionals can create impact by shifting the focus from scale to substance.
For Lacoste, the opportunity wasn't to out-brand other sponsors, but to be visual and true to the brand, in turn making more meaningful impact and connection with tennis fans. Le Club Lacoste Melbourne offers something both experiential and editorially compelling: a cultural destination that blends tennis, fashion, food, and social connection. By creating a bespoke floating Lacoste Court at AFLOAT, complete with live match screenings, casual play, French-inspired food and drink, and exclusive retail, the brand occupies a space that feels premium, considered, and genuinely newsworthy.
PR plays a critical role in shaping this narrative, positioning Lacoste as a cultural contributor to the Australian summer of tennis. By celebrating craftsmanship, athlete individuality, and the brand's quiet confidence, our storytelling naturally extends beyond sports pages into lifestyle, fashion, and culture verticals.
In crowded sponsorship landscapes, distinctiveness comes from depth, not dominance. When a brand adds value to how people experience an event, rather than simply attaching itself to it, it earns attention in a way that feels organic, credible, and enduring. We saw the effectiveness of this strategy for Lacoste when Lacoste Court was booked out within days of being announced.
With fan behaviour shifting toward real-time, social-first consumption, what emerging opportunities do you see for brands to generate earned attention during upcoming global sporting moments?
Earned attention today is driven less by polished campaigns and more by authentic, human moments that unfold naturally around the action. Audiences are no longer just watching the sport itself; they're engaging with the broader cultural ecosystem in real time, from arrivals and personal style to atmosphere, emotion, and shared social rituals. For us, social-first doesn’t mean social-for-social’s-sake. The most effective live brand moments are designed to be experienced first, shared second.
For a brand like Lacoste, this creates an opportunity to focus on moments of style, confidence, and self-expression rather than match results alone. Le Club Lacoste Melbourne is intentionally built with this behaviour in mind, a space that invites people in for the right reasons: connection, culture, and craft. When an experience is compelling in its own right, content capture becomes a natural by-product, not the primary objective.
We're seeing this same "off-track" focus shape engagement at major moments such as the Formula 1 Australian Grand Prix and the Melbourne Cup Carnival. While the sport remains the anchor, participation is increasingly driven by the surrounding experience - fashion, access, and atmosphere. Brands that create environments people actively choose to step into become part of the story rather than a layer over it.
The real opportunity lies in the in-between moments: arrivals, off-court movement, pre-and post-play gatherings, and how the brand can authentically add value through meaningful experiences that connect with their DNA. PR teams now operate as cultural editors, curating access, talent, and context to ensure brands show up with intention. When executed for the right reasons, real-time storytelling doesn’t just extend reach; it builds relevance, credibility, and lasting cultural impact.
Sporting events usually attract layered audiences - from local communities to international viewers, casual fans to passionate purists. How can client stories be adapted into market- and audience-specific angles that are timely and newsworthy without diluting the core narrative?
The strongest partnership stories are designed to stretch across audiences and platforms, while remaining anchored to a single, clear brand truth. With Lacoste, the core story - the intersection of sport, style, and heritage - remains consistent, but the lens through which it's told shifts depending on audience and market.
For the Australian landscape, the global concept of Le Club Lacoste has been adapted to suit the local cultural infrastructure by partnering with an iconic venue in Melbourne's CBD that values authentic experience, whilst also embracing true partnership. At a global level, the story is about Lacoste's global tennis legacy and enduring connection to the sport.
Audience segmentation is equally important. Tennis purists are drawn to performance, athlete credibility, and the brand's authentic roots in the game. Lifestyle and fashion audiences engage more strongly with narratives around identity, craftsmanship, design, and how sport influences broader culture. By creating an experience that integrates sport, fashion, food, and music in an authentic way, we ensure we can capture engagement with any potential audience segment.
By anchoring all storytelling to a single, clearly defined brand truth, PR and comms teams can adapt angles without dilution. The message stays intact; the execution evolves, ensuring relevance across markets while maintaining a cohesive, recognisable narrative.
Chinese fragrance label, DOCUMENTS, has appointed Tony Zhang as CMO. Based in Shanghai, he is responsible for leading the brand and marketing function. This includes overseeing brand management, product and retail marketing, communications, CRM, and training.
Tony most recently served in dual roles at We. Red Bridge as General Manager Beijing and Head of Corporate, Technology, and Healthcare China. The posts saw him leading the agency's Chinese and international client accounts, such as Coca-Cola, GSK, Henkel, LEGO, Microsoft, and Tencent, as well as heading up the Beijing office operations and business development across the Chinese market.
With more than two decades of experience, Tony was previously Vice President at Weber Shandwick.
Adam Welch has joined Sun Life as Director, Communications, Asia. Based in Hong Kong, he is responsible for external communications for the region across media, digital platforms, executive positioning, and thought leadership.
Adam brings more than 16 years of experience spanning corporate communications, executive profiling, digital content strategy, and crisis management. He was most recently with Edelman as a Director in the corporate reputation practice, advising regional and global organisations including AXA Investment Managers, Cathay Pacific, Estée Lauder Companies, Microsoft, and Prudential.
Prior to that, Adam held senior in‑house communications leadership roles at AIA and EY and spent nearly eight years with Commonwealth Bank of Australia across Sydney and Hong Kong.