PR News
Rebecca Jarvie-Gibbs

Telum Talks To: Rebecca Jarvie-Gibbs from Example

In an industry built on agility, speed, and client demands, the line between ambition and exhaustion can be razor-thin. For PR and communications professionals, being constantly "on" has long been framed as a marker of success. But a growing discourse is pushing back, advocating for a shift from toxic hustle to an intentional and sustainable "healthy" hustle, with the focus on clarity, energy, and systems that enable professionals to thrive without burning out.

Telum Media spoke with Rebecca Jarvie-Gibbs, Co-Founder and COO of Example, on what it means to reject performative busyness and embrace balance as a badge of honour. Rebecca recently launched her own podcast, Fine Form, which explores the realities of hustle culture and shares candid insights from her journey through burnout and recovery.

From redefining productivity and reducing friction to modelling sustainable leadership, her reflections provide a roadmap for PR and comms professionals eager to reclaim personal time, protect their energy, and pursue success on their own terms.

What did your own experience with overwork teach you, and when did you first start rethinking what success should look like?
I believe work often reflects what we haven't yet resolved in ourselves. When you're unclear about who you are, the job quickly steps in to define it - offering validation, identity, a sense of worth. That's when ambition shifts.

Instead of being yours to guide you forward, it becomes tethered to external markers - titles, client counts, or how busy you look. On the surface, it may appear impressive, but inside it feels very different.

My turning point came when full-blown burnout collided with the birth of my son - I felt utterly trapped in a cage of my own making. From a dark and uncertain place, I began to rebuild by doing two things. First, I got really clear on how I wanted my work to feel, not just how it looked. And second, I confronted the toxic behaviours I'd adopted around work and made big changes in how I showed up for myself each day.

You've spoken about rejecting toxic hustle. How would you define a "healthy hustle," and what might that balance look like for someone working in PR?
For me, it all comes down to energy - something either gives it to you or takes it away. I still believe in hard work; building a career or life you want takes discipline and focus. But there's a difference between feeling tired yet satisfied, and feeling constantly tired and empty. One feels like effort with momentum, the other feels like effort slammed up against a wall.

My idea of balance may not be the same as someone else's, but the key is clarity. As you move through a period of work, ask yourself: is this exciting me, expanding me, or just exhausting me? A simple way to check is by keeping a "drain vs gain" tracker for a week. If something consistently drains you, it's probably a good time to stop chasing it.

I also think of work in terms of spikes and stretches. There are spikes of intensity - a big pitch, launch, or campaign - that can be energising and exhilarating. But they have to be balanced with stretches of recovery, reflection and recalibration. When the spikes start to feel like the rule instead of the exception, that's when burnout creeps in.

Ultimately, I believe that a healthy hustle is rooted in what I like to call 'professional resonance' - when your ambition is grounded in clear values and sustained by simple, energising habits.

When you look at the PR and communications industry today, do you see a shift in working styles - particularly with younger professionals prioritising wellness, balance, and flexibility - or are we still a long way from breaking free of hustle culture?
I think a lot of people talk about wellness and balance, but don't really know what that actually looks like in practice. And so without realising it, they build habits that actively prevent those things from happening and allow huge amounts of friction into their day - unclear priorities, reactive communication, SO many meetings - and wonder why they feel overwhelmed.

I then see it play out in two main ways. On one side, people disconnect completely. They play it safe, avoid pushing themselves, and end up struggling with a lack of purpose. On the other, they fall into martyrdom, become addicted to the stress and exhaustion and justify doing a lot as if it's the only way to succeed. I've been there, and it's a dangerous place to stay.

For me, the real shift comes when you take ownership of the friction. Burnout doesn’t just "happen" to us - it's the accumulation of habits and systems that we tolerate. Without clarity on how you're working and what you're working toward, it's easy to get swept into a cycle where busyness replaces progress, and wellness remains a buzz word rather than a lived practice.

PR often rewards being busy - but busyness doesn’t always equal progress. How do you personally tell the difference, and what habits or approaches have helped you shift towards real productivity?
I think PR actually rewards agility and creativity, but too often people conflate that with being busy and stretched. One of the great things about our industry is the speed at which you can influence news and culture, and the energy that comes from delivering impactful work and building strong relationships. But you can't be agile when your diary is crammed with back-to-back meetings, and you can't be creative when you're stuck in a perpetual loop of clearing your inbox.

For me, the two biggest habit shifts came down to reducing friction and changing how I communicate. Reducing friction means designing your day so fewer things feel unnecessarily hard - cutting out recurring stress points like clunky processes, mismatched meeting rhythms and unrealistic schedules.

Changing communication meant breaking the cycle of urgency and reactivity. For years, I thought being constantly available and instantly responsive was proof of competence. In reality, it kept me in a constant state of distraction. Now, I don't reply to emails on my phone and I avoid responding in the heat of the moment - because rushed replies made in a heightened state are almost always the ones I regret.

As an agency leader yourself, how do you put these ideas into practice within your own team? And what lessons could other senior leaders take from your approach to building a productive but sustainable culture?
First and foremost, I live it. There's no point talking about balance if you’re still leading from a place of urgency. Panic breeds panic. If you show up constantly spinning plates and stretched thin, the team will think that's what leadership looks like.

It is absolutely crazy to me now that I once thought being a busy leader with a crammed diary and no time to think was inspiring. In reality, it only modelled unsustainable behaviour.

I also used to take on my team's stress, going into overdrive to solve their problems or take work off them. Of course, some things are mine to manage - the resourcing we have, the clients we work with, the timelines we commit to. But how someone chooses to work is ultimately on them. Being clear on what sits in their control and what doesn't has been an important shift.

Ultimately as a leader, you set the tone, so if you remove constant friction, protect energy and model alignment, you give your team permission to do the same.

Previous story

Virginie Cosentino takes up promotion as Business Director

Next story

The Natural Resources Defense Council bolsters comms with new hire

You might also enjoy

Wala
Moves

Wala Amara takes on new challenge in Riyadh

Wala Amara has moved to Riyadh from Dubai and joined 54 as an Account Director. In her new role, she leads strategic communications efforts, focusing on driving narrative and visibility for sports and tourism clients in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Wala joined 54 from Seven Media, where she managed several sports campaigns. She has also worked with 777Partners and DAZN in the UK.

Interview:
Feature

Interview: Jackie Hanafie from Humankind Advisory

 Storytelling has long been central to NGO communications, but its role is evolving. It's no longer only about raising awareness or driving donations, but translating complex issues into human narratives that audiences can grasp and act on.

Telum Media spoke with Jackie Hanafie, Founder and Principal Consultant of Humankind Advisory, about how NGOs can rethink storytelling to influence policy and behaviour, embed ethics and lived experience into communications, balance impact with nuance and accountability, and adopt a more hopeful, human-centred approach.

Storytelling has traditionally helped NGOs drive awareness and donations. As it becomes a more strategic tool to shape public opinion and policy, how should organisations rethink its role in influencing narratives, behaviours, and systemic change?
In today’s crowded, fast-moving information landscape, storytelling should be treated as a strategic asset - shaping how issues are understood, who is seen as responsible, and what solutions feel possible.

That means rethinking storytelling as narrative infrastructure, not just content. Individual stories are powerful, but when they are connected to structural issues - policy gaps, market failures, social norms - they help audiences understand both the what and why. This shifts the focus from charity to justice, from sympathy to shared responsibility. A well-told story can humanise data, but it can also frame policy conversations and influence how decision-makers define the problem.

Storytelling should also shift away from victimhood. Traditional NGO communications often portray communities as passive recipients of aid, but effective storytelling highlights local leadership, resilience, and partnership. This reframes beneficiaries as changemakers rather than dependants. When audiences see dignity and capability, they are more likely to support long-term solutions rather than short-term fixes.

Storytelling should also be aligned with clear behavioural and policy objectives. Whether the goal is shifting public attitudes, influencing a legislative debate, or changing consumer behaviour, narratives should be designed with measurable outcomes in mind. This requires collaboration across communications, policy, and program teams.

When storytelling is strategic, ethical, and systems-focused, it becomes more than awareness-raising; it acts as a catalyst for lasting change.

NGOs often tell stories about underrepresented communities and issues with less power or visibility. How do you ensure these stories are told ethically and respectfully, and that the people involved have a say in how they are represented?
This is a big responsibility for NGOs and ethics must be embedded in the process rather than as a final sign-off before publication.

It starts with informed, ongoing consent - people understanding their story will be shared, where, how, why, and they can withdraw at any time. In a digital world where content can travel far beyond its original context, transparency is essential.

Participation should go beyond consent to collaboration, with communities having a say in story framing, details, and visual representation. This might mean sharing drafts, inviting feedback, co-creating content, or supporting people to tell their own stories. Ethical storytelling shifts from “about them” to “with them”.

Stories should highlight dignity, agency, and context - acknowledging structural barriers without reducing individuals to them, which can unintentionally strip away complexity, humanity, and agency. Safeguarding is also critical, particularly for people in fragile or politically sensitive environments. This includes assessing risks around visibility, privacy, cultural sensitivity, and potential backlash. Sometimes the most ethical choice is to anonymise or not tell a story at all.

Organisations should also create clear internal guidelines and accountability mechanisms around storytelling ethics. When communities are respected as collaborators of their narratives, storytelling becomes more authentic, credible, and powerful in driving meaningful change.

NGOs face pressure to demonstrate impact, but storytelling can risk oversimplifying complex outcomes. How do you use narrative to communicate impact and accountability, while preserving nuance and long-term context?
Demonstrating impact is essential, but social change is rarely linear or attributable to a single intervention. The challenge is to use storytelling not to simplify reality, but to make complexity understandable.

  • Anchor stories in evidence: Personal narratives are powerful entry points, but they should sit alongside data and context. A story can illustrate change in someone’s life, while reporting explains broader trends, limitations, and lessons learned. This balance helps audiences connect emotionally without losing sight of rigour.
  • Be honest about timeframes: Systemic change often unfolds over years. Rather than presenting impact as a “before and after” transformation, NGOs can tell stories of progress, iteration, and adaptation. Sharing setbacks and course corrections builds trust and signals that accountability includes learning, not just success.
  • Clarify contribution rather than claiming sole causation: Most development outcomes result from partnerships - governments, communities, private sector actors, and other civil society organisations. Storytelling that acknowledges this ecosystem avoids overstating impact and reinforces the collaborative nature of change.
  • Preserve nuance through format: Long-form content, case studies, impact reports, and multimedia storytelling allow space for complexity. Even in shorter formats, careful framing - explaining structural barriers, policy contexts, and ongoing challenges - can prevent oversimplification.

When NGOs use storytelling to illuminate both human experience and systemic context, they strengthen public understanding and trust. Impact communication then becomes not just a showcase of results, but an honest reflection of progress, partnership, and purpose.

How are NGOs incorporating lived experience and community voices into storytelling, and what impact has this had on audience engagement and trust?
NGOs are recognising that credibility comes from creating space for communities to speak for themselves. Incorporating lived experience into storytelling is no longer a token gesture; it's becoming central to how organisations design campaigns, shape policy advocacy, and communicate impact.

Practically, this means moving from extractive storytelling to co-creation. Many NGOs now involve community members in identifying which stories are told, the framing, and the platforms used. Some are investing in training, equipment, and digital access so people can produce their own content, such as video diaries, social media takeovers, blogs, or community-led podcasts. Others are establishing advisory groups made up of people with lived experience to guide messaging and narrative strategy.

This shift also influences whose expertise is recognised. Lived experience is increasingly positioned alongside technical and policy expertise, particularly in advocacy campaigns. When people directly affected by an issue contribute to messaging or speak publicly about solutions, it strengthens authenticity and grounds policy debates in real-world realities.

These days, audiences are more discerning than ever and can sense when stories feel staged or overly curated. Community-led narratives tend to resonate more deeply and often generate higher engagement across digital platforms, fostering stronger emotional connection.

Incorporating lived experience also builds trust internally. When communities see their perspectives accurately reflected - and when they have agency in how they are represented - it reinforces partnership rather than hierarchy.

In a time of misinformation and declining trust in institutions, NGOs that centre lived experience are not just improving their communications; they are strengthening legitimacy. Storytelling grounded in authentic community voices signals transparency, respect, and shared ownership of change - qualities that are essential for sustained engagement and public confidence.

Emotional storytelling has long been used to build public support, but there are signs of audience fatigue and desensitisation to emotive appeals. How is storytelling strategy evolving in the NGO sector in response to this?
One shift is from crisis-driven narratives to solutions-focused storytelling. Instead of focusing solely on need, organisations are highlighting progress, innovation, and collective action. This doesn’t minimise the scale of challenges, but it offers audiences a sense of efficacy - showing that change is possible and that their support contributes to tangible outcomes.

There is also a move towards depth and authenticity, as audiences increasingly value transparency, nuance, and honesty over highly polished emotional appeals. NGOs are sharing more behind-the-scenes insights, lessons learned, and even setbacks, which helps build trust and long-term engagement rather than short-term reactions.

Another evolution is audience segmentation and platform sensitivity, with digital analytics helping organisations understand how communities respond to different tones and formats. Storytelling is becoming more tailored - interactive content, short-form video, long-form journalism, community takeovers - rather than relying on a single emotive formula.

Importantly, the sector is also interrogating power and representation. Stories that centre dignity, agency, and partnership tend to resonate more sustainably than those that rely on portraying people at their most vulnerable. Positive, human-centred narratives can inspire solidarity rather than pity.

Storytelling strategy is shifting from eliciting sympathy to building sustained relationships. Organisations that stand out combine emotional resonance with credibility, agency, and hope - engaging audiences as informed partners in long-term change, not just donors. 

Amnesty
Moves

Amnesty International Australia welcomes back a familiar face

Amnesty International Australia has appointed Andrew Beswick as Strategic Communications Manager. After a long previous stint at Amnesty managing campaigns and communications up until 2016, he has returned to lead media strategy and digital comms for its human rights campaigns.

Following his earlier tenure, Andrew went on to work in senior roles across the not-for-profit and government sectors, including at Oxfam Australia, Wyndham City Council and National Disability Services.