PR News
<span id="hs_cos_wrapper_name" class="hs_cos_wrapper hs_cos_wrapper_meta_field hs_cos_wrapper_type_text" style="" data-hs-cos-general-type="meta_field" data-hs-cos-type="text" >Telum Talks To: Celia Harding, Founder of LEOPRD</span>

Telum Talks To: Celia Harding, Founder of LEOPRD

Fuelled by bold ideas, big ambitions and tight budgets, startups and scaleups don't typically leap at the idea of investing in PR - often believing the timing isn't quite "right". However, PR remains one of the most cost-effective ways to gain traction without a big budget. In a world where the media landscape moves at a rapid pace, is there ever really a "perfect" time to start?

Telum spoke with Celia Harding, Founder of LEOPRD, a Language Engine Optimisation (LEO) PR consultancy that builds fame, findability and authority in the age of AI. Having worked extensively across the startup and scaleup space, Celia shares her perspective on when and how founders should approach PR, how to break into established markets, and what it takes to move beyond momentary hype to build lasting brand relevance.

Is there a "chicken and egg" dynamic when it comes to startups and PR - do they need to grow and become established before investing in PR, or is growth actually driven by making noise early on?
Founders often think they need to 'earn the right to do PR' - waiting for more followers, more traction and more funding, but the reality is the media cares more about people doing new and interesting things rather than the number of followers they've got. Startups are born out of a vision to solve an existing problem or because there is a gap in the market for what they do. You don't get attention because you're big, you scale because you earned attention early.

While every startup has their sights firmly set on a story in the Australian Financial Review, there are plenty of other media outlets out there too - some of which might be more relevant to their target audience. Startups often need to consider other PR opportunities beyond traditional media, including industry engagement, speaking gigs, reviews and the potential personal branding opportunities for the team.

What frustrates me most is when I see bootstrapped founders investing in paid ads before putting themselves forward for earned media opportunities, missing out on simple ways to drive credibility and awareness to a larger audience more cost effectively.

You work with both startups and scaleups - how different are their needs, and how does this affect the way they approach PR strategy?
Often they have similar goals - credibility, visibility, relevance. Startups want to show they are a player, while scaleups want to show they are a category leader.

After scrappy beginnings, there comes a point when both startups and scaleups have their roadmap nailed and want to give things a bigger push (normally around four years in). They realise they didn't do enough around their initial launch and now want more people to know who they are and what they do - either ahead of a fundraising round, new product launch or when competitors have been making noise and they've been too quiet.

It's relatively hard for startups to break into an established market with harsh competition. What would their priorities be with PR, and what are some core things they should focus on?
Be super focused - clarity kills noise. Know their edge. Know who cares. And know how to sum up what they do in one sentence. Beyond that, every founder should be mining their team, product and data for earned media stories - be it founder backstory, usage trends, customer wins, or cultural relevance.

In the age of AI, PR is no longer just about humans. It’s about machines finding you, too. As people move away from Google and use large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT to research and make purchasing decisions, brands need to ensure they are part of the recommendations they provide, otherwise they risk being erased from the conversation entirely.

What they need to understand is that these models care more about what other people say about you, than what you say yourself - with earned media driving over 62 per cent of LLM responses. Meanwhile, Meta ad content isn't being scraped or cited.

Some startups gain short-term hype during their initial phase and struggle to capitalise on the attention. How can PR help ensure long-term success rather than momentary hype?
One splashy headline doesn't build authority. Startups need an always-on press office mindset, think about industry commentary, campaigns and category signals to build trust and credibility. You can't be a one-hit wonder and expect to win long-term. Consistency for the win.

With LLMs focusing on recency for their recommendations, this is more important than ever.

You've helped out various startups and scaleups across different industries. Which sector has been the most challenging and why?
We are deliberately industry agnostic - it keeps our thinking fresh and enables us to ask the simple questions others overlook, which usually leads to the smartest angles. Some industries are harder than others - but if they've found a customer base, we'll find ways to reach them.
Previous story

UNTMD Marketing and Chiquita PR join forces

Next story

Natalie Kaplan joins the education sector

You might also enjoy

Sefiani
Research

Sefiani unveils new research on AI visibility ownership

Strategic communications consultancy, Sefiani, part of Clarity Global, has released a new study indicating that 84 per cent of Australian marketing and comms leaders disagree on who "owns" AI visibility, while the remaining 16 per cent take an integrated approach.

Conducted by OnePoll on behalf of Sefiani, the research surveyed 150 marketing and communications leaders at Director level and above from organisations with more than 50 employees, exploring how strategies have been adapted in response to AI search.

According to the report, 91 per cent of cross-departmental leaders are revising their strategies to influence AI-driven discovery, although an internal "turf war" is emerging over who controls brands' AI search visibility. The research found that ownership currently sits across five functions: data / analytics (23 per cent), comms / corporate affairs (20 per cent), brand (19 per cent), digital (17 per cent), and performance (16 per cent), which the agency said reflects a structurally fragmented approach within many organisations.

The "silo" challenge
To complement its findings, Sefiani collected qualitative insights from leaders through a series of executive GEO-focused sessions and a recent panel moderated by Mandy Galmes, Managing Partner at Sefiani. Speakers included Johanna Lowe, Chief Marketing and Communications Officer at the University of Sydney; Brad Pogson, Head of Communications at Lendi Group; and Tom Telford, Chief Digital Officer at Clarity Global.

Based on these discussions, several themes emerged around managing reputation in AI-driven environments:

  • Internal silos as a key barrier: Participants noted that while some leaders are encouraging cross-functional experimentation, others remain 'nihilistic' about breaking down traditional departmental walls, leading to stalled effort and wasted budgets. The panel identified the rise of AI as a 'shadow task' layered on top of existing senior role requirements without removing previous duties, which further delays progress.
  • The forever life of reputational issues: According to panellists, LLMs draw on long-term patterns across coverage, reviews, forums, and owned content, meaning historic issues may continue resurfacing in AI-generated responses. This suggests that organisations might need to take a more data-led, cross-channel approach to finding, correcting, and rebalancing inaccurate information.
  • Quality content remains critical: Insights from the discussion indicated that AI models do not discriminate by content format, but they do reward depth. The findings suggest that high-quality, thought leadership content performs better within LLM training sets, so it should be considered as central to strategies across channels moving forward.

The cost of siloed GEO: Misinformation and reputational risk
The agency stated that a lack of clear ownership over GEO is already having tangible consequences. Based on the research, AI search was cited by leaders as the most structurally siloed channel, with 77 per cent reporting problems in the last 12 months. This included a slower response to issues, conflicting messages across channels, and AI tools amplifying yesterday's problems instead of today's narratives.

The study also found that the risk is compounded by the speed at which AI-generated misinformation can spread, with 25 per cent of leaders reporting that incorrect, inconsistent, or outdated brand information has already appeared in AI answers.

"Reputation used to be managed channel by channel, but AI search has changed the rules. Because these systems read across everything - earned coverage, on-site content, social signals, and search authority - siloed marketing and communications are quietly muting your AI visibility," said Tom Telford.

"When your channels don't tell the same story, or teams are chasing independent KPIs with separate budget pots, these silos also become a major reputational liability. It is only when functions are truly connected that the models become trained on a consistent brand message and compound visibility across AI services over time. This is the crux of GEO, Generative Engine Optimisation, and done well it becomes the multiplier on everything you already invest in brand, PR and digital."

The "citations race": PR and earned media take centre stage
The report also suggested that a shift toward AI-first discovery is changing budget priorities.

According to the findings, 49 per cent of leaders have already allocated five to 10 per cent of their marketing and communications budgets to AI visibility, with 90 per cent of that spend being reallocated from traditional channels like paid digital and brand. A further 30 per cent reported allocating up to 20 per cent of their budgets.

Citing external analysis from Gartner, the agency noted that the majority of sources referenced by AI systems are non-paid, which the report argues increases the strategic importance of PR and earned media in AI-driven discovery.

Mandy Galmes said: "When LLMs answer a question in your category, they’re drawing overwhelmingly on non-paid, third party sources. If your spokespeople, experts, case studies and proof points aren’t in those sources, you’re invisible at a key moment in the buyer journey." 

Francesca
Moves

Francesca Talevski moves into education sector with senior comms role

Francesca Talevski has been welcomed at Keypath Education as Senior Manager, Communications & Brand. She has wrapped up close to a decade at Vanguard Australia, most recently as Senior Public Relations Specialist.  

Rhiannon
Moves

Rhiannon Hughes takes up Vivid Sydney contract

Rhiannon Hughes has started as PR Manager for Vivid Sydney at Destination NSW. She was previously at TEAM LEWIS as Campaign Director.

Rhiannon also holds experience at Employsure, Sling & Stone AU / NZ, and Porter Novelli New Zealand.