PR News
Beyond the Breach

Study Highlight: Beyond the Breach

Porter Novelli has partnered with Hall & Wilcox and Quantum Market Research on a new national study, 'Beyond the Breach - Aligning Consumer and Business Expectations in Cyber Incident Response'. The study revealed a widening disconnect between the way Australian consumers expect organisations to respond to a data breach, and what business leaders believe is enough.

Cyber incidents have been a growing issue for Australian business leaders and consumers, with over 1100 reported breaches in 2024 alone, the highest annual total, since the notifiable data breaches (NDB) scheme began in 2018, representing a 25 per cent increase from 893 notifications in 2023.

The research aims to provide insights into two key areas to help business leaders understand what consumers expect during a cyber incident, and how to more effectively support individuals impacted by a cyber incident:

  • How consumer expectations have evolved over the past two years regarding the way organisations behave when they have suffered a cyber incident.
  • The disconnects between consumer expectations and business leaders' views on what their obligations and priorities should be during a cyber incident.

Privacy has never been more important to consumers
Australians revealed that privacy trumps convenience, with 75 per cent saying that they care more about the privacy of their data than benefiting from the convenience of online technology.

58 per cent of respondents reported they are more concerned about the security of their personal information online than they were five years ago, which had been fuelled by scandals like Cambridge Analytica, data breaches, and unease over AI's lofty promises.

Consumers are also sceptical that institutions can protect them from hackers, with only 40 per cent agreeing that organisations can securely protect their personal information, and just 20 per cent believing that organisations are actually doing enough to protect that information. This has decreased significantly from two years ago, when 64 per cent of Australians believed organisations could securely protect their information, and 41 per cent thought organisations were doing enough.

Trauma from previous cybersecurity incidents has continued to drive feelings of helplessness, which led to 48 per cent of consumers reporting that they are taking measures to protect their own personal information online.

Financial data tops consumers’ and business leaders’ concerns in cyber incident
The study found that 47 per cent of consumers were more concerned about losing banking details than their ID or health information. Business leaders attested to this, with 62 per cent agreeing that their customers are most concerned about their financial information.

The report suggested that this concern is warranted, as the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC), indicated that the financial sector ranked among the top three industries to report the most notifiable breaches in 2024.

Australians remain distressed, even as concern about cybercrime fluctuates
Concern about cybercrime peaked in 2023, with 74 per cent expressing significant concern, before dropping to 51 per cent by June 2025. However, the emotional toll of a cyber incident remains unchanged, with 45 per cent of Australians who experienced a data breach reporting emotional distress in 2025, consistent with 48 per cent in 2023.

The study highlighted that levels of concern vary, and is reactive to high-profile breaches, media coverage and political agendas.

Consumers demand faster speed of information
The report found that 46 per cent of those affected by cyber incidents felt they received information quickly enough. While 31 per cent of consumers prioritise timeliness, 28 per cent of business leaders believe that the speed of resolution is just as important as transparent communication.

However, the report noted that expectations around speed differ across stakeholders and organisations. Larger brands or those operating in critical infrastructure sectors tend to face higher demands for rapid and transparent communication when incidents occur.

Organisations are not doing enough to protect customer trust
Respondents revealed that organisations needed to support their customers, members, employees, or donors more effectively following a cybersecurity incident.

Business leaders surveyed were unanimous in their view that their customers expect their organisation to provide transparent information in a cyber incident, yet only 50 per cent agreed business leaders should go beyond basic legal requirements. Organisations that do the bare minimum following a cyber incident are only trusted by two per cent of Australians.

For organisations that acted quickly to provide clear, transparent information and guidance to help consumers protect themselves, there were improved results in trust and reputation, with 25 per cent saying they would purchase from the organisation again, 23 per cent saying they would recommend the organisation to others, and 23 per cent would trust the organisation. In 2023, a higher percentage of consumers said they would re-engage with the organisation involved, which indicates that organisational response to cybersecurity incidents is eroding customer trust over time.

It was reported that 33 per cent of Australians are frustrated by the lack of timely information that was provided to them when they were impacted by a cyber incident over the past 12 months. This was followed by 27 per cent reporting the organisation didn't provide guidance on how they could protect themselves.

What can business leaders do?
The report suggested some key actions business leaders can take to build customer trust in the event of a cybersecurity incident:

  1. Communicate faster and smarter, in line with their stakeholders' expectations.
  2. Go beyond legal requirements with transparency.
  3. Prioritise empathy.

Read the full report here.

Previous story

Adrian Pardede moves to Japan, takes on directorial role at luxury hotel

Next story

The Dali EDITION brings in pre-opening marcomms lead from Canada

You might also enjoy

Emma
Moves

Emma Lowde takes up new opportunity in the tech sector

Emma Lowde has started as Senior Communications Manager at Diraq, a Sydney-founded quantum computing company developing silicon-based technology to make quantum computers scalable, economical, and widely accessible. She joins from Intuit, where she was most recently Senior Communications Manager for the APAC region.

Emma has built up 15 years’ experience as a communications professional, including leadership roles at eBay Australia and New Zealand, following agency roles in Australia and the UK. 

Are
Feature

Are media releases dead? What 10,000 journalists told us they want from PR Teams in 2026

Every few years, someone declares the death of the media release.

Today, the arguments sound familiar. Journalists don't read them anymore. Everything is social-first. AI is replacing traditional media outreach. It's all about the pitch. Press releases are becoming little more than AI-generated filler.

And yet, when we speak with journalists across Asia Pacific and the Middle East, a different picture emerges.

Media releases aren't dead, but expectations around them have changed significantly.

We've analysed more than 10,000 Journalist Interest Survey responses in the Telum Media platform collected over the past five years, alongside insights gathered from conversations with editors, reporters, and producers across the region.

Key takeaways:

  1. Journalists still value useful PR content
  2. Relevance matters more than reach
  3. The pitch and the release serve different roles
  4. The best releases reduce friction for journalists
  5. Modern releases need to support multiple platforms

The conclusion is clear: journalists still value media releases, but they value them for different reasons than they once did.

The media release has evolved from a distribution tool into something far more strategic.

The media release is no longer the story

For decades, many PR professionals treated the media release as the centrepiece of media relations activity.

Write the release. Send it widely. Hope for coverage - “spray and pray”.

That approach was far from perfect, but you could get away with it in an era when newsrooms were larger, competition for attention was lower, and journalists had more time to evaluate incoming information.

Today's reality is very different.

Journalists are producing content across multiple platforms, often with smaller teams and tighter deadlines. Their inboxes are flooded with pitches, announcements, thought leadership submissions, and increasingly, AI-generated content.

As a result, journalists have become far more selective about what earns their attention.

The modern media release is no longer just about news stories. It has become a source-of-truth asset, a newsroom resource, and a content hub that supports broader communications activity.

The best PR teams understand this shift.

“The strongest message from journalists can be summarised in a single phrase: ‘Understand what I cover’. Relevance remains the most important factor in successful media engagement.”

What journalists are actually rejecting

One of the most revealing findings from our analysis is that journalists are not rejecting PR content altogether.

What they're rejecting is low-value outreach.

Across thousands of responses, the same frustrations appeared repeatedly:

    • Irrelevant pitches
    • Generic outreach
    • Mass distribution
    • Weak story angles
    • Excessive follow-ups

In other words, this is less a rejection of media releases and more a rejection of poor media relations practice.

The strongest message from journalists can be summarised in a single phrase:

"Understand what I cover."

Relevance remains the most important factor in successful media engagement. In fact, our journalist surveys over the past two years have seen a sharp increase in a desire for both relevance and personalisation in pitches.

Journalists increasingly assess pitches within seconds. If the connection to their beat, audience, or current priorities isn't immediately obvious, the opportunity is often lost before the email is even opened.

The pitch and the release have different jobs

One of the biggest misconceptions in modern media relations is treating the pitch and the release as the same thing.

They are not.

The pitch exists to earn attention; the release exists to support the story.

The best pitches are:

    • Brief
    • Human
    • Relevant
    • Contextual
    • Conversational

The best releases are:

    • Structured
    • Factual
    • Complete
    • Reusable
    • Easy to reference

At a recent Telum Media event, a senior journalist described the fastest way to kill a pitch with a single word: “Respect”. Or a lack thereof.

A generic greeting. A story unrelated to their beat. A mass-produced email that demonstrates no understanding of their audience.

All signal a lack of respect for the journalist's time and expertise.

High-performing PR teams increasingly write pitches and releases for different audiences. The pitch is written for the journalist. The release is written for the journalist's audience.

That distinction matters.

Why journalists still value media releases

Despite predictions of their demise, journalists continue to actively request media releases.

But they want releases that help them work more efficiently.

The most common requests include concise writing, clear headlines, strong news angles, supporting data (with downloadable images and assets), spokesperson access, and easy-to-use formats.

These preferences reveal the modern role of the release: it functions as a workflow tool.

A strong release helps journalists:

    • Understand the story quickly
    • Verify information
    • Access supporting materials
    • Build content efficiently

The best releases reduce friction. And in today's newsroom environment, reducing friction is often more valuable than generating hype.

Think beyond media coverage

Another major shift is that media releases are increasingly serving multiple audiences.

A modern release doesn’t just support journalists; it might also support clients and prospects, employees, investors and analysts, partners, and search visibility.

Rather than creating a single-use document, leading communications teams are building content ecosystems.

The release becomes the foundation for:

    • Media outreach
    • Newsroom content
    • Executive communications
    • Social media content
    • Email campaigns
    • Sales collateral
    • Thought leadership activity

This approach not only improves consistency but also increases the return on investment from every announcement.

Media Releases - Releases today

The role of the modern media release

 

Not every story needs a release

Perhaps one of the most important lessons is recognising when a media release is the wrong tool.

Releases tend to perform best when there is:

    • Genuine news value
    • Multiple stakeholder audiences
    • A need for factual consistency
    • Strong supporting assets
    • Broader business significance

They are often less effective for internal milestones framed as major news (or self-congratulatory announcements), generic thought leadership, and untargeted mass outreach.

In some situations, a targeted pitch, LinkedIn strategy, executive commentary programme, or direct relationship-based outreach may be more effective.

Good communications strategy isn't about defaulting to a media release; it's about choosing the right tool for the objective.

A framework for modern media releases

If there is one word that captures what journalists are asking for today, it is respect.

At Telum Media, we summarise this through the RESPECT framework:

R – Relevance
Make it relevant to the journalist, their audience and the moment.

E – Efficiency
Help journalists work faster through clear, concise, and usable content.

S – Substance
Provide genuine value through expertise, data, insight, or access.

P – Personalisation
Demonstrate that you've done your homework.

E – Ecosystem
Think beyond the release and consider how it supports broader communications goals.

C – Clarity
Make the key message immediately obvious.

T – Timing
Reach out at the right time, not simply any time.

Media Releases - RESPECT

What journalists are asking for in a pitch / media release: RESPECT

 

The future of the media release

The debate over whether media releases are dead misses the point.

The more useful question is how do we make releases work better in today’s media environment?

Journalists still value relevant information, credible sources, strong story angles, and efficient communication. Media releases continue to play an important role in delivering those things.

But success today depends less on the existence of the release itself and more on how strategically it is used.

The media release remains a valuable communications tool.

Just not in the way many of us were taught to use it.

 

FAQs

Are media releases still useful in 2026?

Yes. Journalists still value media releases, but these days want targeted outreach, relevance to their beat, alignment with their audience, and contextual pitching.

What makes a media release useful to journalists?

Journalists are looking for releases in a format that helps them work efficiently. Which means releases that are concise, factual, with a clear angle, contain usable quotes, and come with downloadable assets and supporting data.

What is the difference between a pitch and a media release?

A pitch earns the journalist’s attention in their cluttered Inbox. A media release supports the story by providing structured, factual, and reusable information relevant to their audience.

 

With more than 30 years’ experience spanning journalism, corporate communications and media intelligence, Reuben Aitchison is Telum Media’s Head of Insights and Communications.

Explore Telum Media tools that help PR teams pitch with precision. 

Rika
Moves

Rika Rufina promoted to Communications Manager

PR and communications agency, Wrights, has promoted Rika Rufina to Communication Manager, strengthening the agency’s integrated communications, issues management, and Asia Pacific capabilities.

Rika will help steer corporate and consumer retainer accounts, bringing together PR, social, and creative campaigns. She will also work with Chief Executive Officer Douglas Wright and General Manager Reena Llanillo to develop and implement issues management strategies.

Rika joined Wrights in August 2025 as a Senior Communication Consultant, bringing experience from PR agencies, as well as from in-house roles across APAC, particularly in the Singapore market.

Douglas said Rika’s promotion reflected the contribution she had made to the agency and its clients.

“Rika has delivered strong results. I look forward to working closer with her and the Wrights team as we continue to deliver ingenious and impactful communications, anchored in authenticity and positive change,” he said.

“Our secret sauce is simple: ingenious thinking, brought to life by a talented and ambitious team. Rika’s promotion is another important step in strengthening our team and setting Wrights up for its next phase of growth.”

The promotion forms part of a broader period of growth for Wrights, with the agency also promoting Charlotte Dickson to Communication Consultant and will welcome Annabel Chambers as PR and Social Coordinator.