IKEA has recently drawn attention for how it has responded to unexpected cultural moments across different markets, from turning an April Fools concept into an actual campaign with its meatball lollipops in Australia and New Zealand, to responding to the viral Punch and Djungleskog phenomenon in Japan.
Telum Media spoke to Patricia Routledge, Country Communications Manager at IKEA Australia and New Zealand, to find out how the team prepares for unplanned opportunities, decides when to participate, and balances local cultural relevance with global brand consistency.
Preparation before the moment arrives
According to Patricia, responding quickly to an unexpected cultural moment starts long before it breaks. One of the most important things that the team at IKEA has built beforehand is trust, which she explains as one of the most important foundations.
"As a communications team, we spend a lot of time building credibility with the wider organisation by doing what we say we're going to do - even when that means holding opinions or recommending directions that aren't always the easiest path forward. When stakeholders trust you, it becomes much easier to act quickly when unplanned opportunities arise."
At IKEA, that trust is backed by its investment in building a strong internal spokesperson network.
"We know exactly who to call for sales data, product insight, or expert commentary, and we've already done the work of building those relationships before a moment hits. That allows us to move fast with information that genuinely adds value to a story - whether that's local data that reinforces a national trend or insight that challenges it in a way that sparks interest," she says.
For PR and communications practitioners, speed is not just about having fewer approval layers - it also depends on doing the groundwork early. Patricia explains that this creates room for the unexpected.
"When cultural moments break - both good and bad - everything else drops, so disciplined planning gives us the buffer to respond without burning out the team. PR also requires a certain level of hustle, both internally and externally."
The discipline continues after the moment has passed. Patricia says the team looks for data that shows whether the response delivered commercial or reputational value - not attention alone. That focus on value also shapes when the brand chooses to participate.
Know when the brand has permission to participate
Not every viral conversation is a brand opportunity. For communications teams, one of the most important skills is knowing when to step forward and when to hold back.
For Patricia, permission to participate starts with relevance. She starts by asking whether the moment has a genuine alignment with the business.
"Is it our range? Our expertise? And can we credibly influence or contribute to the conversation, rather than simply jumping on someone else's bandwagon?"
That relevance test helps prevent a brand from entering a conversation purely because it is visible. A cultural moment may be attracting attention, but that does not mean the organisation has a credible role in it.
Proof points are also an important factor that Patricia says should be considered.
"Do we have 'skin in the game' - whether that's a product, a solution, or something we've already done that gives us permission to participate? If we're not adding anything new or meaningful, that's often a sign to pull back."
Tone then determines how that participation should show up.
"Are we being clever and contributing positively to the conversation, or are we at risk of overtly commercialising something in a way that could put people offside? We're also mindful of potential offence - even playful moments can land differently depending on context."
For retail brands like IKEA, the final decision is also operational. Patricia warns that attention can quickly become a problem if it creates demand the business cannot meet.
"If participation risks creating friction for customers or co-workers, restraint is usually the more strategic choice."
Accountability improves speed
Large organisations often need to balance speed with governance. For fast-moving cultural moments, unclear ownership can slow decision-making or create reputational risk.
For Patricia, the answer lies in where responsibility sits.
"Within our team, the communications manager is accountable for trust - if we act on something that isn't right, the responsibility sits with us. That clarity actually enables speed, because decision-making doesn't become diffused."
For PR and communications leaders, the lesson is that governance should create confidence, not hesitation. At IKEA, that approach is reinforced through a "no surprises" approach.
"Regular updates and sharing outcomes helps reinforce why moving quickly matters and builds confidence for next time. While IKEA doesn't have shareholders, we are a franchisee operating within a global brand, so there are still very real guardrails. That balance gives us flexibility but also requires discipline - if we push the brand too far, there are consequences."
The broader point is that fast cultural response is an organisational habit, not a shortcut around process.
"Ultimately, speed comes from trust, transparency, and experience. When the organisation knows the comms team will act responsibly and escalate risks early, it creates permission to move fast without compromising the brand."
Keep the global brand consistent, but let local culture shape the expression
For global brands, cultural relevance is rarely one-size-fits-all. Local markets need enough flexibility to respond to what audiences care about, while still protecting the consistency of the wider brand.
For IKEA, that flexibility starts with a shared foundation.
"We anchor everything in our global positioning framework, which is consistent across markets and deeply connected to IKEA's 80-year-old vision: to create a better everyday life for the many people. That consistency gives us a strong foundation," Patricia says.
"Within that framework, our customer value proposition is adapted locally depending on culture, market maturity, and competition. This allows us to remain both consistent and relevant. How the brand shows up in each market can vary, as long as it fits within the positioning framework and brand guidelines."
She further explains that the model also shapes how IKEA brings its global themes into local markets.
"We also have global themes that are consistent across markets, such as our Positive Impact focus areas - Domestic and Family Violence, Refugee Workforce Inclusion, and Zero Emissions Delivery. While the themes remain the same, the way we bring them to life is adapted to local conditions.”
For local teams, the opportunity is to express the brand in ways that feel specific to the market without losing the wider IKEA platform.
The result is a mix of ideas that can travel across markets and others that are intentionally local. Patricia adds that some ideas work seamlessly across markets, such as the meatball lollipops in Australia and New Zealand. Others are deliberately local, including Meatball Party Pies and flatpack flip flops in Australia, and Kiwi House and Garage Parties in New Zealand.
"That balance allows us to leverage the strength of the global brand while staying culturally connected," she says.
Listen systematically, then ask why the audience should care
Many cultural moments begin with the way people use, talk about or reinterpret a brand. To participate well, communications teams need to listen beyond formal campaign channels.
For IKEA ANZ, that listening is built into its day-to-day communications rhythm, supported by its PR agency, FleishmanHillard.
"We run an always-on culture lab that monitors news, social media, and broader cultural trends. Importantly, we allow space within our day-to-day remit to respond when something relevant emerges - particularly around our range.”
That process helps the team spot moments already happening around the brand, rather than trying to manufacture relevance.
"We've seen strong success with IKEA 'dupes,' such as a lamp that closely resembled one owned by Sarah Jessica Parker. More recently, when Nagi from RecipeTin Eats shared her love of IKEA frying pans, we were able to move quickly with media outreach, spokesperson commentary and sales data, alongside gifting the product to relevant influencers."
Patricia says that the next test is understanding audience value.
"We also ask ourselves, 'so what?' Why should audiences care, and what’s in it for them? For example, our Meatball Party Pies were free on the opening day of our birthday weekend, alongside 50-cent hot dogs. Our House Parties in New Zealand were also free to attend. Sometimes participation in culture means expecting nothing in return and simply thanking customers for their loyalty."
The takeaway for communications teams is to define value more broadly than immediate conversion. Cultural participation can reinforce goodwill, reward loyalty and show that a brand understands its community.
Treat humour and experimentation as strategic decisions
Humour can be powerful, but it still needs governance. IKEA ANZ’s meatball lollipop started as a playful April Fools concept before becoming a real product following strong audience response.
For Patricia, communications activity is rarely isolated from the wider organisation.
"We take a 360-degree approach that brings together PR, corporate communications and public affairs, which means we are always assessing reputational risk across disciplines."
That shared judgement gives the team a clear point for escalation.
"If we identify any level of risk, we escalate early and align with the country management team as the ultimate decision-makers before anything goes live. That process allows us to experiment confidently while maintaining strong governance."
For communications teams, experimentation works best when it is connected to the business rather than treated as a one-off content idea.
"We collaborate deeply with marketing, home furnishing, and interior design experts, and use sales data to strengthen stories and influence outcomes - while remaining mindful of stock levels and customer expectations."
The final test is whether the response has a clear role beyond the moment itself.
"Wherever possible, we align communications activity to a clear commercial outcome and ask: 'what’s the call to action?' Will this make someone more likely to visit, purchase, or engage - and can we do more to support that journey?”
For modern communications teams, responding to culture is not just reactive. It depends on preparation, permission, and clear decision-making that protects reputation while keeping pace with culture.
How modern communications teams respond to culture
Telum Media creating connections
Get in touch to learn more
Think HQ announces COO appointment
You might also enjoy
Emma Lowde has started as Senior Communications Manager at Diraq, a Sydney-founded quantum computing company developing silicon-based technology to make quantum computers scalable, economical, and widely accessible. She joins from Intuit, where she was most recently Senior Communications Manager for the APAC region.
Emma has built up 15 years’ experience as a communications professional, including leadership roles at eBay Australia and New Zealand, following agency roles in Australia and the UK.
Every few years, someone declares the death of the media release.
Today, the arguments sound familiar. Journalists don't read them anymore. Everything is social-first. AI is replacing traditional media outreach. It's all about the pitch. Press releases are becoming little more than AI-generated filler.
And yet, when we speak with journalists across Asia Pacific and the Middle East, a different picture emerges.
Media releases aren't dead, but expectations around them have changed significantly.
We've analysed more than 10,000 Journalist Interest Survey responses in the Telum Media platform collected over the past five years, alongside insights gathered from conversations with editors, reporters, and producers across the region.
Key takeaways:
- Journalists still value useful PR content
- Relevance matters more than reach
- The pitch and the release serve different roles
- The best releases reduce friction for journalists
- Modern releases need to support multiple platforms
The conclusion is clear: journalists still value media releases, but they value them for different reasons than they once did.
The media release has evolved from a distribution tool into something far more strategic.
The media release is no longer the story
For decades, many PR professionals treated the media release as the centrepiece of media relations activity.
Write the release. Send it widely. Hope for coverage - “spray and pray”.
That approach was far from perfect, but you could get away with it in an era when newsrooms were larger, competition for attention was lower, and journalists had more time to evaluate incoming information.
Today's reality is very different.
Journalists are producing content across multiple platforms, often with smaller teams and tighter deadlines. Their inboxes are flooded with pitches, announcements, thought leadership submissions, and increasingly, AI-generated content.
As a result, journalists have become far more selective about what earns their attention.
The modern media release is no longer just about news stories. It has become a source-of-truth asset, a newsroom resource, and a content hub that supports broader communications activity.
The best PR teams understand this shift.
“The strongest message from journalists can be summarised in a single phrase: ‘Understand what I cover’. Relevance remains the most important factor in successful media engagement.”
What journalists are actually rejecting
One of the most revealing findings from our analysis is that journalists are not rejecting PR content altogether.
What they're rejecting is low-value outreach.
Across thousands of responses, the same frustrations appeared repeatedly:
- Irrelevant pitches
- Generic outreach
- Mass distribution
- Weak story angles
- Excessive follow-ups
In other words, this is less a rejection of media releases and more a rejection of poor media relations practice.
The strongest message from journalists can be summarised in a single phrase:
"Understand what I cover."
Relevance remains the most important factor in successful media engagement. In fact, our journalist surveys over the past two years have seen a sharp increase in a desire for both relevance and personalisation in pitches.
Journalists increasingly assess pitches within seconds. If the connection to their beat, audience, or current priorities isn't immediately obvious, the opportunity is often lost before the email is even opened.
The pitch and the release have different jobs
One of the biggest misconceptions in modern media relations is treating the pitch and the release as the same thing.
They are not.
The pitch exists to earn attention; the release exists to support the story.
The best pitches are:
- Brief
- Human
- Relevant
- Contextual
- Conversational
The best releases are:
- Structured
- Factual
- Complete
- Reusable
- Easy to reference
At a recent Telum Media event, a senior journalist described the fastest way to kill a pitch with a single word: “Respect”. Or a lack thereof.
A generic greeting. A story unrelated to their beat. A mass-produced email that demonstrates no understanding of their audience.
All signal a lack of respect for the journalist's time and expertise.
High-performing PR teams increasingly write pitches and releases for different audiences. The pitch is written for the journalist. The release is written for the journalist's audience.
That distinction matters.
Why journalists still value media releases
Despite predictions of their demise, journalists continue to actively request media releases.
But they want releases that help them work more efficiently.
The most common requests include concise writing, clear headlines, strong news angles, supporting data (with downloadable images and assets), spokesperson access, and easy-to-use formats.
These preferences reveal the modern role of the release: it functions as a workflow tool.
A strong release helps journalists:
- Understand the story quickly
- Verify information
- Access supporting materials
- Build content efficiently
The best releases reduce friction. And in today's newsroom environment, reducing friction is often more valuable than generating hype.
Think beyond media coverage
Another major shift is that media releases are increasingly serving multiple audiences.
A modern release doesn’t just support journalists; it might also support clients and prospects, employees, investors and analysts, partners, and search visibility.
Rather than creating a single-use document, leading communications teams are building content ecosystems.
The release becomes the foundation for:
- Media outreach
- Newsroom content
- Executive communications
- Social media content
- Email campaigns
- Sales collateral
- Thought leadership activity
This approach not only improves consistency but also increases the return on investment from every announcement.

The role of the modern media release
Not every story needs a release
Perhaps one of the most important lessons is recognising when a media release is the wrong tool.
Releases tend to perform best when there is:
- Genuine news value
- Multiple stakeholder audiences
- A need for factual consistency
- Strong supporting assets
- Broader business significance
They are often less effective for internal milestones framed as major news (or self-congratulatory announcements), generic thought leadership, and untargeted mass outreach.
In some situations, a targeted pitch, LinkedIn strategy, executive commentary programme, or direct relationship-based outreach may be more effective.
Good communications strategy isn't about defaulting to a media release; it's about choosing the right tool for the objective.
A framework for modern media releases
If there is one word that captures what journalists are asking for today, it is respect.
At Telum Media, we summarise this through the RESPECT framework:
R – Relevance
Make it relevant to the journalist, their audience and the moment.
E – Efficiency
Help journalists work faster through clear, concise, and usable content.
S – Substance
Provide genuine value through expertise, data, insight, or access.
P – Personalisation
Demonstrate that you've done your homework.
E – Ecosystem
Think beyond the release and consider how it supports broader communications goals.
C – Clarity
Make the key message immediately obvious.
T – Timing
Reach out at the right time, not simply any time.
What journalists are asking for in a pitch / media release: RESPECT
The future of the media release
The debate over whether media releases are dead misses the point.
The more useful question is how do we make releases work better in today’s media environment?
Journalists still value relevant information, credible sources, strong story angles, and efficient communication. Media releases continue to play an important role in delivering those things.
But success today depends less on the existence of the release itself and more on how strategically it is used.
The media release remains a valuable communications tool.
Just not in the way many of us were taught to use it.
FAQs
Are media releases still useful in 2026?
Yes. Journalists still value media releases, but these days want targeted outreach, relevance to their beat, alignment with their audience, and contextual pitching.
What makes a media release useful to journalists?
Journalists are looking for releases in a format that helps them work efficiently. Which means releases that are concise, factual, with a clear angle, contain usable quotes, and come with downloadable assets and supporting data.
What is the difference between a pitch and a media release?
A pitch earns the journalist’s attention in their cluttered Inbox. A media release supports the story by providing structured, factual, and reusable information relevant to their audience.
With more than 30 years’ experience spanning journalism, corporate communications and media intelligence, Reuben Aitchison is Telum Media’s Head of Insights and Communications.
Explore Telum Media tools that help PR teams pitch with precision.
PR and communications agency, Wrights, has promoted Rika Rufina to Communication Manager, strengthening the agency’s integrated communications, issues management, and Asia Pacific capabilities.
Rika will help steer corporate and consumer retainer accounts, bringing together PR, social, and creative campaigns. She will also work with Chief Executive Officer Douglas Wright and General Manager Reena Llanillo to develop and implement issues management strategies.
Rika joined Wrights in August 2025 as a Senior Communication Consultant, bringing experience from PR agencies, as well as from in-house roles across APAC, particularly in the Singapore market.
Douglas said Rika’s promotion reflected the contribution she had made to the agency and its clients.
“Rika has delivered strong results. I look forward to working closer with her and the Wrights team as we continue to deliver ingenious and impactful communications, anchored in authenticity and positive change,” he said.
“Our secret sauce is simple: ingenious thinking, brought to life by a talented and ambitious team. Rika’s promotion is another important step in strengthening our team and setting Wrights up for its next phase of growth.”
The promotion forms part of a broader period of growth for Wrights, with the agency also promoting Charlotte Dickson to Communication Consultant and will welcome Annabel Chambers as PR and Social Coordinator.
